Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KURSKI v. POLAND

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KURSKI v. POLAND

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10
• EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 26115/10

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 41486/04

  SELECKIS c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10

  In this context the Court considers journalists and publicists like other persons actively involved in public life should display a greater degree of tolerance for criticism against them (see, mutatis mutandis, I Avgi Publishing and Press Agency S.A. and Karis v. Greece, no. 15909/06, § 34, 5 June 2008; Seleckis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 41486/04, § 32, 2 March 2010).
• EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 8895/10

  ÄRZTEKAMMER FÜR WIEN AND DORNER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10

  Therefore, in a democratic system the limits of permissible criticism are much wider with regard to newspapers than in relation to a private citizen (see, mutatis mutandis, Ärztekammer für Wien and Dorner v. Austria, no. 8895/10, § 65, 16 February 2016).
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

  FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10

  Noting the case of Feldek v. Slovakia (no. 29032/95, ECHR 2001-VIII), it further reiterated that where a statement amounted to a value judgment, the proportionality of the interference may depend on whether there existed a sufficient factual basis for the impugned statement, since even a value judgment without any factual basis to support it may be excessive.

 
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23556/94

  CEYLAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10

  The Court also observes that there is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political expression or on debate on questions of public interest (see, among many other authorities, Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996-V, and Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 05.06.2008 - 15909/06

  I AVGI PUBLISHING AND PRESS AGENCY S.A. AND KARIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10

  In this context the Court considers journalists and publicists like other persons actively involved in public life should display a greater degree of tolerance for criticism against them (see, mutatis mutandis, I Avgi Publishing and Press Agency S.A. and Karis v. Greece, no. 15909/06, § 34, 5 June 2008; Seleckis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 41486/04, § 32, 2 March 2010).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 26115/10

  In addition journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no. 313).