Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PAULIUKIENE AND PAULIUKAS v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 25716/94

  JANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  They noted that civil servants acting in an official capacity were, like politicians, subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than others (see Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 33, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 23.07.2009 - 12268/03

  HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES (ICI PARIS) c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  Indeed, as a matter of principle these rights deserve equal respect (see Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no. 12268/03, § 41, 23 July 2009; and Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 111, 10 May 2011).
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48009/08

  Keine Pflicht zur Vorabbenachrichtigung bei Veröffentlichung privater …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  Indeed, as a matter of principle these rights deserve equal respect (see Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no. 12268/03, § 41, 23 July 2009; and Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 111, 10 May 2011).

 
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  Where the balancing exercise between those two rights has been undertaken by the national authorities in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see MGN Limited, cited above, §§ 150 and 155, and Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, § 57, ECHR 2011).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 108-113, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  Accordingly, the severity of the adverse effects on his reputation were not sufficiently serious to give rise to an interference with his private life (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  In addition, the Court is mindful of the fact that journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see the Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no. 313).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  Furthermore, it is not for the Court, any more than it is for the national courts, to substitute its own views for those of the press as to what techniques of reporting should be adopted in a particular case (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298, and Eerikäinen and Others v. Finland, no. 3514/02, § 65, 10 February 2009).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of "public watchdog" (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 59 and 62, ECHR 1999-III; and Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 71, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 13.11.2019 - 39401/04

  MGN LIMITED AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 18310/06

  It noted that in such cases the Court may be required to ascertain whether the domestic authorities struck a fair balance when protecting two values guaranteed by the Convention which may come into conflict with each other in certain cases: namely, on the one hand freedom of expression protected by Article 10, and on the other the right to respect for private life enshrined in Article 8 (see Axel Springer AG, cited above, § 84, and MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, § 142, 18 January 2011; for the criteria relevant for the balancing exercise see Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos.