Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 72331/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,35093) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRONE VERLAGS GMBH & CO KG v. AUSTRIA (No. 4)
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
No violation of Art. 10 (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.09.2005 - 72331/01
- EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 72331/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 53678/00
Karhuvaara und Iltalehti / Finnland
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 72331/01
The Court further recalls in this respect that its task is not to review the relevant law and practice in abstracto, but to determine whether the manner in which they were applied to or affected the applicant gave rise to a violation of the Convention (see, as a recent authority, Karhuvaara and Iltalehti v. Finland, no. 53678/00, § 49, ECHR 2004-..., with further references). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89
JERSILD v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 72331/01
Punishment for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person in an interview would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to the discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so (Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III; Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, pp.25-26, § 35). - EGMR, 02.05.2000 - 26132/95
BERGENS TIDENDE ET AUTRES c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 72331/01
The methods of objective and balanced reporting may vary considerably, depending among other things on the medium in question; it is not for the Court, any more than it is for the national courts, to substitute its own views for those of the press as to what techniques of reporting should be adopted by journalists (Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, § 57, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97
THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 72331/01
Punishment for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person in an interview would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to the discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so (Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III; Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, pp.25-26, § 35). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 72331/01
The Court refers to the general principles relating to freedom of the press and the question of assessing the necessity of an interference with that freedom, as set out in the summary of its established case-law in the cases of Fressoz and Roire v. France ([GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I).