Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PETROPAVLOVSKIS v. LATVIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Petropavlovskis v. Latvia

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 44230/06
• EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  The Court's Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland (no. 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts)) reiterated the fundamental principles as regards freedom of expression (referring to the cases of Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, § 101, ECHR 2007 V, and Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 87, ECHR 2005-II) as follows:.
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

  Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  Pluralism and democracy must also be based on dialogue and a spirit of compromise necessarily entailing various concessions on the part of individuals or groups of individuals which are justified in order to maintain and promote the ideals and values of a democratic society (see S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 128, ECHR 2014 (extracts) with further references).
• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 65831/01

  Schutz der Infragestellung der von den Nazis am jüdischen Volk begangenen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  The Court has also held that a "remark directed against the Convention's underlying values" is removed from the protection of Article 10 by Article 17 (see Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, § 53, Reports 1998-VII, and Garaudy v. France (dec.), no. 65831/01, ECHR 2003-IX).

 
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  Having already found that Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention are not applicable in the present case, the Court reaches the same conclusion in respect of Article 13 as there is no "arguable complaint" under the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).
• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 17851/91

  Radikalenerlaß

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  The Government also considered that the present case should be distinguished from the cases of Redfearn and Vogt, where the applicants had subsequently experienced difficulties in finding employment after dismissal (Redfearn v. the United Kingdom, no. 47335/06, 6 November 2012, and Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, Series A no. 323).
• EuGH, 02.03.2010 - C-135/08

  Die Rücknahme einer durch Täuschung erschlichenen Einbürgerung kann zur …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  In case C-135/08 Janko Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern (judgment of 2 March 2010), the Court of Justice ruled as follows (references omitted):.
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  The applicant submitted that the nature and severity of the sanction imposed were factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference (he referred to Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 64, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

  Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  In any event, freedom of expression also covered ideas and expression that offended, shocked or disturbed (he cited Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49, Series A no. 24) and freedom of assembly also protected demonstrations that might annoy or give offence to persons opposed to the ideas or claims that they were seeking to promote (he referred to Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  More generally, the applicant submitted that the measures taken by the domestic authorities were capable of discouraging the participation of "non-citizens" in debates over matters of legitimate public concern (he cited Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 64, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85

  CASTELLS v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  Furthermore, the limits of criticism were wider in relation to the government than to a private citizen (he cited Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 46, Series A no. 236).
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 53124/09

  GENOVESE v. MALTA
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

• OVG Nordrhein-Westfalen, 23.11.2018 - 19 A 2389/17

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens hinsichtlich Verletzung mangels Verleihung der …

  EGMR, Urteile vom 13. Januar 2015 - 44230/06 -, Rn. 73 f. (Petropavlovskis/Litauen, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-150232"]}), vom 11. Oktober 2011, a. a. O., Rn. 30, vom 23. Mai 2006 - 46343/99 -, Rn. 153-155 (Riener/Bulgarien, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-75463"]}), und vom 12. Januar 1999 - 31414/96 -, NVwZ 2000, 301 (302 f., Karassev/Finnland); Zimmermann/ Landefeld, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention und Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht der Konventionsstaaten, ZAR 2014, 97 (99).
• OVG Nordrhein-Westfalen, 23.11.2018 - 19 A 2390/17

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens hinsichtlich Verletzung mangels Verleihung der …

  EGMR, Urteile vom 13. Januar 2015 - 44230/06 -, Rn. 73 f. (Petropavlovskis/Litauen, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-150232"]}), vom 11. Oktober 2011, a. a. O., Rn. 30, vom 23. Mai 2006 - 46343/99 -, Rn. 153-155 (Riener/Bulgarien, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-75463"]}), und vom 12. Januar 1999 - 31414/96 -, NVwZ 2000, 301 (302 f., Karassev/Finnland); Zimmermann/ Landefeld, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention und Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht der Konventionsstaaten, ZAR 2014, 97 (99).
• EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  GODENAU v. GERMANY

  As evidenced by the lecture she had organised in Barcelona in 2015, the inclusion on the list in question had not deterred the applicant from continuing her political activities and expressing her views, which meant that the impugned measure had not had a chilling effect on her (they referred to Petropavlovskis v. Latvia, no. 44230/06, § 77, ECHR 2015).