Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DRIZA c. ALBANIE [Extraits]
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1... Abs. 1, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violations de l'art. 6-1 Violation de P1-1 Violation de l'art. 13+P1-1 Dommage matériel et préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (ensemble) et restitution du lot de terrain par le Gouvernement Frais et dépens - demande rejetée (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DRIZA v. ALBANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1... Abs. 1, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violations of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Violation of Art. 13+P1-1 Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - financial awards (global) and Government to return the plot of land Costs and expenses - claim dismissed (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (65) Neu Zitiert selbst (14)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2003-IX; and Rosca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 24, 22 March 2005).The fact that this remedy was revoked after the occurrence of the pertinent events in this case is of no relevance: there exist no domestic remedies capable of remedying the impairment of the principle of legal certainty brought about by the use of the supervisory-review procedure and its effects were never redressed in the present case (see Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, ECHR 2004-II, and Ryabykh v. Russia (dec.), no. 52854/99, 21 February 2002).
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34256/96
DI MAURO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
Furthermore, once a deficiency in the legal system has been identified by the Court, the national authorities have the task, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, of taking within a determined period of time - retrospectively if needs be - (see, among other authorities, Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, §§ 39, 40, 22 December 2005; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 233, ECHR 2006; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V; and Di Mauro v. Italy [GC], no. 34256/96, § 23, ECHR 1999-V) the necessary measures of redress in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity under the Convention, so that the Court does not have to reiterate its finding of a violation in a long series of comparable cases. - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97
BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
Furthermore, once a deficiency in the legal system has been identified by the Court, the national authorities have the task, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, of taking within a determined period of time - retrospectively if needs be - (see, among other authorities, Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, §§ 39, 40, 22 December 2005; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 233, ECHR 2006; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V; and Di Mauro v. Italy [GC], no. 34256/96, § 23, ECHR 1999-V) the necessary measures of redress in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity under the Convention, so that the Court does not have to reiterate its finding of a violation in a long series of comparable cases.
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
In addition, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1) (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
The Court reiterates that costs and expenses will not be awarded under Article 41 unless it is established that they were actually incurred, were necessarily incurred and were also reasonable as to quantum (see The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 38, p. 13, § 23). - EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
Nevertheless, the powers and procedural guarantees an authority possesses are relevant in determining whether the remedy before it is effective (see Klass and Others v. Germany, judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, p. 30, § 67). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
It recalls that by virtue of Article 1 the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the guaranteed rights and freedoms is laid on the national authorities (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 69582/01
SARDINE c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
The fact that this remedy was revoked after the occurrence of the pertinent events in this case is of no relevance: there exist no domestic remedies capable of remedying the impairment of the principle of legal certainty brought about by the use of the supervisory-review procedure and its effects were never redressed in the present case (see Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, ECHR 2004-II, and Ryabykh v. Russia (dec.), no. 52854/99, 21 February 2002). - EGMR, 02.03.2005 - 71916/01
Entschädigungs- und Ausgleichsleistungsgesetzes über die Wiedergutmachung von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
71916/01, 71917/01 and 10260/02, § 74, ECHR 2005-V; and Beshiri cited above). - EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 6267/02
ROSCA v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2003-IX; and Rosca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 24, 22 March 2005). - EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83
HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK
- EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
- EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79
PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
- EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
KARELIN v. RUSSIA
In that connection, the Court considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15
Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben
In that connection, it considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 77/07
Italien muss männlich dominiertes Namensrecht ändern
Cependant, lorsqu'un dysfonctionnement a été décelé dans le système national de protection des droits de l'homme, la Cour a le souci d'en faciliter la suppression rapide et effective (Driza c. Albanie, no 33771/02, § 125, CEDH 2007-XII, et Vyerentsov c. Ukraine, no 20372/11, § 94, 11 avril 2013).
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 7932/04
BELPERIO ET CIARMOLI c. ITALIE
Elle rappelle l'obligation pesant sur les autorités nationales de se doter de tous les moyens adéquats et suffisants pour assurer le respect des obligations qui leur incombent en vertu de l'adhésion à la Convention et pour éviter que le rôle de la Cour soit engorgé d'un grand nombre d'affaires répétitives portant sur les indemnités accordées par des cours d'appel dans le cadre de procédures « Pinto ", la durée de celles-ci et/ou le retard dans le paiement des sommes en question, ce qui constitue une menace pour l'effectivité à l'avenir du dispositif mis en place par la Convention (voir Cocchiarella, précité, §§ 69-107 et §§ 125-130 ; mutatis mutandis, Scordino c. Italie (no 3) (satisfaction équitable), no 43662/98, §§ 14-15, CEDH 2007-... ; Driza c. Albanie, no 33771/02, § 122, CEDH 2007-... (extraits) ; Katz c Roumanie, no 29739/03, § 9, 20 janvier 2009). - EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 22644/03
SIMALDONE c. ITALIE
Cependant, la Cour estime devoir attirer l'attention du Gouvernement sur le problème des retards apportés au paiement des indemnités « Pinto'et sur la nécessité, pour les autorités nationales, de se doter de tous les moyens adéquats et suffisants en vue d'assurer le respect des obligations qui leur incombent en vertu de la Convention et d'éviter l'introduction devant la Cour d'un grand nombre d'affaires répétitives portant sur les indemnités accordées par des cours d'appel dans le cadre de procédures « Pinto'et/ou le retard dans le paiement des sommes en question qui engorgeraient son rôle, ce qui constituerait une menace pour l'effectivité à l'avenir du dispositif mis en place par la Convention (voir Cocchiarella c. Italie, précité, §§ 69-107 et §§ 125-130 ; mutatis mutandis, Scordino c. Italie (no 3) (satisfaction équitable), no 43662/98, §§ 14-15, CEDH 2007-... ; Driza c. Albanie, no 33771/02, § 122, CEDH 2007-... (extraits) ; et Katz c Roumanie, no 29739/03, § 9, 20 janvier 2009). - EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
IACOV STANCIU v. ROMANIA
However, the Court's concern is to facilitate the rapid and effective suppression of a shortcoming found in the national system of protection of human rights (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 28.04.2008 - 35014/97
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA c. POLOGNE
For no apparent reason, other Governments in other situations involving a systemic violation have not been so fortunate (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V, or Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, 13 November 2007). - EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 45867/07
GAGLIONE ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
La Cour voit dans cette défaillance de l'État non seulement un facteur aggravant quant à sa responsabilité au regard de la Convention à raison d'une situation passée ou actuelle, mais également une menace pour l'effectivité à l'avenir du dispositif mis en place par la Convention (Scordino c. Italie (no 3) (satisfaction équitable), no 43662/98, §§ 14-15, CEDH 2007-III, Driza c. Albanie, no 33771/02, § 122, CEDH 2007-XII (extraits), Katz c. Roumanie, no 29739/03, § 9, 13 novembre 2008). - EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06
ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court's concern is to facilitate the rapid and effective suppression of a shortcoming found in the national system of protection of human rights (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
VRIONI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
The relevant sections of the Property (Restitution and Compensation) Act have been described in Beshiri and Others v. Albania (no. 7352/03, §§ 21-29, 22 August 2006), Driza v. Albania (no. 33771/02, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2007-... (extracts) and Ramadhi and Others v. Albania (no. 38222/02, §§ 23-30, 13 November 2007).In this connection, it is the State's responsibility to organise the legal system in such a way as to avoid the adoption of discordant judgments in parallel proceedings and to uphold the principle of legal certainty of final judgments, which was impaired by the use of the supervisory review procedure in the instant case (see, in relation to the quashing of a final judgment, Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 69, ECHR 2007-... (extracts).
- EGMR, 19.11.2015 - 46998/08
MIKHAYLOVA v. RUSSIA
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 11.04.2018 - C-600/16
National Iranian Tanker Company / Rat - Rechtsmittel - Gemeinsame Außen- und …
- EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 20372/11
VYERENTSOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 11353/06
SHISHANOV c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 10613/16
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 30078/06
KONSTANTIN MARKIN c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 55997/14
DOS SANTOS CALADO ET AUTRES c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42337/12
SUSO MUSA v. MALTA
- EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 59012/17
VALEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
KHARCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 40662/19
SEVDARI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 40583/15
IGNATOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 33192/07
KAÇIU AND KOTORRI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 7975/06
KLAUS ET IOURI KILADZE c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 36318/18
SCERRI v. MALTA
- EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 58858/00
Guiso-Gallisay ./. Italien
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 6397/04
BUSHATI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 31122/05
GHIGO v. MALTA
- EGMR, 06.07.2021 - 70306/10
TIGRAK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 75614/14
VICTOR LAURENTIU MARIN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 39814/12
AGRO FRIGO OOD v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 46193/13
CHANYEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13
KIM v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 16047/10
UTE SAUR VALLNET c. ANDORRE
- EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 12793/03
BALITSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 35720/04
VRIONI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 29739/03
KATZ c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 17647/04
EDWARDS v. MALTA
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 31846/08
TÜM EMEKLILER SENDIKASI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 77050/11
PEREIRA DA SILVA c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 37295/05
SILIQI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 29975/06
SHARRA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 847/05
BERHANI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 9074/07
MULLAI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 35720/04
VRIONI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA AND ITALY
- EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 23204/07
GHAVTADZE c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 9870/07
POGHOSSIAN c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 12306/04
NURI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 23066/02
FAIMBLAT c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 24466/03
URBANOVICI v. ROMANIA
- EGMR - 49121/06
[ENG]
- EGMR - 37419/06
[ENG]
- EGMR - 1504/07
[ENG]
- EGMR - 58058/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
- EGMR - 30658/18 (anhängig)
FRROKU v. ALBANIA
- EGMR - 33369/17 (anhängig)
GABA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR - 6045/14 (anhängig)
LASKU AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR - 24267/16 (anhängig)
ZYBERI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 30601/08
LULI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 6397/04
BUSHATI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 40335/02
PREOTEASA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR - 32850/16 (anhängig)
ILIRIA SRL IN LIQUIDAZIONE v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 45264/04
HAMZARAJ v. ALBANIA (No. 1)
- EGMR - 84056/17 (anhängig)
KROI AND NOCKA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 45265/04
HAMZARAJ v. ALBANIA (NO. 2)