Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,58144
EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,58144)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.11.2007 - 33771/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,58144)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. November 2007 - 33771/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,58144)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,58144) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DRIZA c. ALBANIE [Extraits]

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1... Abs. 1, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1 MRK
    Violations de l'art. 6-1 Violation de P1-1 Violation de l'art. 13+P1-1 Dommage matériel et préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (ensemble) et restitution du lot de terrain par le Gouvernement Frais et dépens - demande rejetée (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DRIZA v. ALBANIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1... Abs. 1, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1 MRK
    Violations of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Violation of Art. 13+P1-1 Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - financial awards (global) and Government to return the plot of land Costs and expenses - claim dismissed (englisch)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (65)Neu Zitiert selbst (14)

  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

    RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2003-IX; and Rosca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 24, 22 March 2005).

    The fact that this remedy was revoked after the occurrence of the pertinent events in this case is of no relevance: there exist no domestic remedies capable of remedying the impairment of the principle of legal certainty brought about by the use of the supervisory-review procedure and its effects were never redressed in the present case (see Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, ECHR 2004-II, and Ryabykh v. Russia (dec.), no. 52854/99, 21 February 2002).

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34256/96

    DI MAURO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    Furthermore, once a deficiency in the legal system has been identified by the Court, the national authorities have the task, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, of taking within a determined period of time - retrospectively if needs be - (see, among other authorities, Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, §§ 39, 40, 22 December 2005; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 233, ECHR 2006; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V; and Di Mauro v. Italy [GC], no. 34256/96, § 23, ECHR 1999-V) the necessary measures of redress in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity under the Convention, so that the Court does not have to reiterate its finding of a violation in a long series of comparable cases.
  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

    BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    Furthermore, once a deficiency in the legal system has been identified by the Court, the national authorities have the task, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, of taking within a determined period of time - retrospectively if needs be - (see, among other authorities, Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, §§ 39, 40, 22 December 2005; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 233, ECHR 2006; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V; and Di Mauro v. Italy [GC], no. 34256/96, § 23, ECHR 1999-V) the necessary measures of redress in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity under the Convention, so that the Court does not have to reiterate its finding of a violation in a long series of comparable cases.
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

    COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    In addition, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74

    SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1) (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    The Court reiterates that costs and expenses will not be awarded under Article 41 unless it is established that they were actually incurred, were necessarily incurred and were also reasonable as to quantum (see The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 38, p. 13, § 23).
  • EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

    Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    Nevertheless, the powers and procedural guarantees an authority possesses are relevant in determining whether the remedy before it is effective (see Klass and Others v. Germany, judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, p. 30, § 67).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    It recalls that by virtue of Article 1 the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the guaranteed rights and freedoms is laid on the national authorities (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 69582/01

    SARDINE c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    The fact that this remedy was revoked after the occurrence of the pertinent events in this case is of no relevance: there exist no domestic remedies capable of remedying the impairment of the principle of legal certainty brought about by the use of the supervisory-review procedure and its effects were never redressed in the present case (see Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, ECHR 2004-II, and Ryabykh v. Russia (dec.), no. 52854/99, 21 February 2002).
  • EGMR, 02.03.2005 - 71916/01

    Entschädigungs- und Ausgleichsleistungsgesetzes über die Wiedergutmachung von

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    71916/01, 71917/01 and 10260/02, § 74, ECHR 2005-V; and Beshiri cited above).
  • EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 6267/02

    ROSCA v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
    One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2003-IX; and Rosca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 24, 22 March 2005).
  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

    HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

  • EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87

    PADOVANI v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

    PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08

    KARELIN v. RUSSIA

    In that connection, the Court considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15

    Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben

    In that connection, it considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 77/07

    Italien muss männlich dominiertes Namensrecht ändern

    Cependant, lorsqu'un dysfonctionnement a été décelé dans le système national de protection des droits de l'homme, la Cour a le souci d'en faciliter la suppression rapide et effective (Driza c. Albanie, no 33771/02, § 125, CEDH 2007-XII, et Vyerentsov c. Ukraine, no 20372/11, § 94, 11 avril 2013).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht