Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,94) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OJALA AND ETUKENO OY v. FINLAND
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35 MRK
Preliminary objection partially allowed (Article 34 - Victim) Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- urheberrecht.org (Kurzinformation)
EGMR zeigt Grenzen des »Kiss and Tell«-Journalismus auf
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
OJALA AND ETUKENO OY v. FINLAND
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 53678/00
Karhuvaara und Iltalehti / Finnland
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
The Court accepts therefore that the interference was "prescribed by law" (see Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 34, ECHR 2002-II; Selistö v. Finland, no. 56767/00, § 34, 16 November 2004; Karhuvaara and Iltalehti v. Finland, no. 53678/00, § 43, ECHR 2004-X; and Eerikäinen and Others v. Finland, cited above, § 58). - EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93
NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
The need for any restrictions must be established convincingly (see, for example, Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 41, Series A no. 103; and Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII). - EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90
PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
In addition, the Court is mindful of the fact that journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no. 313; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas, loc. cit.).
- EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90
FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
Similar considerations apply also to persons in the public eye (see Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 75, Series A no. 294-B; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 94, ECHR 2005-II; and contrast with Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 65, ECHR 2004-VI; and MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, § 143, 18 January 2011). - EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11508/85
BARFOD c. DANEMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
In particular, it must determine whether the interference in issue was "proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued" and whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it were "relevant and sufficient" (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 62, Series A no. 30; Lingens v. Austria, cited above, § 40; Barfod v. Denmark, 22 February 1989, § 28, Series A no. 149; Janowski v. Poland, cited above, § 30; and News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 52, ECHR 2000-I). - EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 31611/96
NIKULA c. FINLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
The Court accepts therefore that the interference was "prescribed by law" (see Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 34, ECHR 2002-II; Selistö v. Finland, no. 56767/00, § 34, 16 November 2004; Karhuvaara and Iltalehti v. Finland, no. 53678/00, § 43, ECHR 2004-X; and Eerikäinen and Others v. Finland, cited above, § 58). - EGMR, 13.11.2019 - 39401/04
MGN LIMITED AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
Similar considerations apply also to persons in the public eye (see Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 75, Series A no. 294-B; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 94, ECHR 2005-II; and contrast with Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 65, ECHR 2004-VI; and MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, § 143, 18 January 2011). - EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01
STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
Similar considerations apply also to persons in the public eye (see Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 75, Series A no. 294-B; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 94, ECHR 2005-II; and contrast with Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 65, ECHR 2004-VI; and MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, § 143, 18 January 2011). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89
JERSILD v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
In doing so, the Court has to satisfy itself that the national authorities applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10 and, moreover, that they based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298). - EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 69939/10
In particular, it must determine whether the interference in issue was "proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued" and whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it were "relevant and sufficient" (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 62, Series A no. 30; Lingens v. Austria, cited above, § 40; Barfod v. Denmark, 22 February 1989, § 28, Series A no. 149; Janowski v. Poland, cited above, § 30; and News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 52, ECHR 2000-I). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
- EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 31457/96
NEWS VERLAGS GmbH & Co. KG v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 14852/18
TÜZÜNATAÇ c. TÜRKIYE
La Cour rappelle, dans ce contexte, que même si elle a admis par le passé que des éléments de la vie privée pouvaient être révélés en raison de l'intérêt que le public pouvait avoir à prendre connaissance de certains traits de la personnalité d'une personne publique (voir les affaires Ojala et Etukeno Oy c. Finlande, no 69939/10, §§ 54-55, 14 janvier 2014, et Ruusunen c. Finlande, no 73579/10, §§ 49-50, 14 janvier 2014), la vie amoureuse et sentimentale d'une personne présente en principe un caractère strictement privé.