Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 45223/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,40606) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SULTANI v. FRANCE [Extracts]
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 4, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 3 No violation of P4-4 (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(französisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 45223/05
- EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 45223/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 45917/99
ANDRIC v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 45223/05
The Government considered that in the instant case the French authorities had complied with the Court's case-law (they referred to Andric v. Sweden (dec.), no. 45917/99, 23 February 1999, and Conka [v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I]) since no official statement announcing an intention on the part of the French authorities to conduct collective expulsions had preceded the introduction of reserved flights to Afghanistan and the applicant's request had been responded to in an individualised and personal decision. - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 45223/05
The Court further points out that, in order for a decision or measure favourable to the applicant to be sufficient to deprive him of his status as a victim, the national authorities must have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 34, Series A no. 238; Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports [of Judgments and Decisions] 1996-III; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 142, ECHR 2000-IV).