Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHUZHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-2 Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of P1-1 Just satisfaction dismissed (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (36)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 31457/96

  NEWS VERLAGS GmbH & Co. KG v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court considers that where a photograph published in the context of reporting on pending criminal proceedings has no information value in itself, there must be compelling reasons to justify an interference with the defendant's right to respect for his private life (compare News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 58 et passim, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 05.05.1995 - 18465/91

  AIR CANADA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court observes that the charging of the car amounted to a temporary restriction on its use and thus fell under the scope of the second paragraph of Article 1 concerning "a control of the use of property" (see Air Canada v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 5 May 1995, Series A no. 316-A, § 34).
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

  DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that in various cases where an applicant has died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or close family members who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before it (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 42095/98

  DAKTARAS c. LITUANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person "charged with a criminal offence" is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62) but also covers statements made by other public officials about pending criminal investigations which encourage the public to believe the suspect guilty and prejudge the assessment of the facts by the competent judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; and Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 48297/99

  BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person "charged with a criminal offence" is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62) but also covers statements made by other public officials about pending criminal investigations which encourage the public to believe the suspect guilty and prejudge the assessment of the facts by the competent judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; and Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that in various cases where an applicant has died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or close family members who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before it (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 50774/99

  SCIACCA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that the concept of private life includes elements relating to a person's right to his or her image and that the publication of a photograph falls within the scope of private life (see Gurgenidze v. Georgia, no. 71678/01, § 55, 17 October 2006; Sciacca v. Italy, no. 50774/99, § 29, ECHR 2005-I; and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, §§ 50-53, ECHR 2004-VI).
• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  Article 6 § 1 leaves to the State a free choice of the means to be used in guaranteeing litigants these rights (see Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 59-60, ECHR 2005-II).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 71678/01

  GOURGUÉNIDZÉ c. GÉORGIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  The Court reiterates that the concept of private life includes elements relating to a person's right to his or her image and that the publication of a photograph falls within the scope of private life (see Gurgenidze v. Georgia, no. 71678/01, § 55, 17 October 2006; Sciacca v. Italy, no. 50774/99, § 29, ECHR 2005-I; and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, §§ 50-53, ECHR 2004-VI).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

• BGH, 14.10.2015 - 1 StR 56/15

  Fall Mollath: Revision des Angeklagten als unzulässig verworfen

  Dabei hat der Gerichtshof der konkreten Wortwahl der jeweils angegriffenen Entscheidung maßgebliche Bedeutung beigemessen und diese im Kontext mit der gegebenen Verfahrenslage gewürdigt (vgl. EGMR, Slg. 2000-X Nr. 39, 41 - Daktaras/Litauen; EGMR, NJW 2004, 43 Nr. 54, 56 - Böhmer/Deutschland; EGMR, Urteil vom 27. Februar 2007 - 65559/01 Nr. 88 f. - Neš?ák/Slowakei; EGMR, Urteil vom 23. Oktober 2008 - 13470/02 Nr. 94 - Khuzhin u.a./Russland; EGMR, Urteil vom 2. Juni 2009 - 24528/02 Nr. 45 ff. - Borovský/Slowakei).
• EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 17103/10

  Verletzung des Grundsatzes der Unschuldsvermutung gegenüber einem türkischen …

  Der Gerichtshof hat in diesem Zusammenhang die Bedeutung betont, die der Wortwahl von Amtsträgern bei Äußerungen zukommt, die diese tätigen, bevor eine Person wegen einer bestimmten Straftat verurteilt worden ist (…siehe Daktaras , a. a. O., Rdnr. 41;… B. , a. a. O., Rdnrn. 54 und 56; Nesťák ./. Slowakei , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 65559/01, Rdnrn. 88 und 89, 27. Februar 2007; Khuzhin u. a. ./. Russland , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 13470/02, Rdnr. 94, 23. Oktober 2008;… und Borovský , a. a. O., Rdnrn. 45 f.).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 40984/07

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court has consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person has been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal offence (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 94, 23 October 2008, with further references).

 
• EGMR, 22.05.2014 - 15172/13

  ILGAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court has consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person has been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal offence (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 94, 23 October 2008, with further references).
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 51111/07

  Prozess gegen Kreml-Kritiker Chodorkowski war "unfair"

  The Court has consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person has been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal offence (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 94, 23 October 2008, with further references).
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13

  MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE

  The cases in which it has found a breach of the respective Article purely owing to the lack of a legitimate aim are rarer still (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, §§ 117-18, 23 October 2008; Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512/04, §§ 73-74, 12 February 2009; P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08, § 133, 30 October 2012; and Karajanov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 2229/15, §§ 75-77, 6 April 2017), although in a recent case the Grand Chamber found an absence of legitimate aim and yet went on to examine whether the interference had been necessary (see Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, §§ 156-57, ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 20899/03

  G.C.P. v. ROMANIA

  The Government also submitted that, unlike in the cases of Samoila and Cionca v. Romania (no. 33065/03, 4 March 2008), Vitan v. Romania (no. 42084/02, 25 March 2008) and Khuzhin v. Russia (no. 13470/02, 23 October 2008), D.I.C."s statement had not been of a nature such as to influence or to prejudice the decisions of the judges examining the case and/or public opinion to the applicant's disadvantage, had been strictly and legally focused on the development of the criminal investigation against the applicant and had not been represented as established fact without any qualification or reservation.

  The Court has consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person has been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal offence (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 94, 23 October 2008, with further references).

• EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 6091/06

  RYWIN c. POLOGNE

  La Cour a souligné à plusieurs reprises que le choix des termes employés par les agents de l'État dans les déclarations qu'ils formulent avant qu'une personne n'ait été jugée et reconnue coupable d'une infraction revêt une importance particulière (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Daktaras, no 42095/98, § 41, 10 octobre 2000, Arrigo et Vieille c. Malte (déc.), no 6569/04, 10 mai 2005, et Khoujine et autres c Russie, no 13470/02, § 94, 23 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05

  HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court has consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person has been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal offence (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 94, 23 October 2008, with further references).
• EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 57195/17

  Keine Verletzung des Rechts auf privates Familienleben: Maddie McCann's Eltern …

  À cet égard, elle observe que si le livre avait été publié avant la décision de classement sans suite du parquet, les affirmations litigieuses auraient pu porter atteinte à la présomption d'innocence des requérants, garantie par l'article 6 § 2 de la Convention, en préjugeant l'appréciation des faits par l'autorité d'enquête (voir à cet égard, Allenet de Ribemont c. France, 10 février 1995, § 41, série A no 308 et Khoujine et autres c. Russie, no 13470/02, § 96, 23 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 17053/20

  BAVCAR v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 2840/10

  OOO MEMO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

  FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 19866/04

  ÜRFI ÇETINKAYA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 09.12.2010 - 16966/06

  MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 25404/09

  GAFOROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33468/03

  Verletzung der Unschuldsvermutung eines Verstorbenen durch gerichtliche …
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 40523/08

  PESA v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 11436/06

  MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 2641/06

  TSVETELIN PETKOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 20383/04

  KHMEL v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 73455/11

  SIDIKOVY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 55659/14

  RUDYKH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 23319/08

  NEAGOE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 11643/20

  ISPIRYAN v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 31.10.2017 - 56795/13

  BAURAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 3189/07

  OLGA NAZARENKO c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 7259/03

  MITKUS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 475/08

  EILDERS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 19673/03

  GRYAZNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 30782/03

  KOZLOV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 58359/12

  HASCÁK v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 49670/13

  KUKAJ v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 55382/07

  ZABELIN AND ZABELINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 493/15

  VOICULESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 20437/05

  SHAGIN v. UKRAINE