Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,62109) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 13 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
- EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
The applicant was claiming an interference with her means of subsistence, an individual, economic right flowing from specific rules laid down in a statute (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, § 46), and it is irrelevant for that purpose that the claim was to be satisfied by sums paid via the State which had taken on the task of obtaining them from Mr K. - EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
The Court recalls that Article 6 § 1 secures to everyone the right to have a claim relating to his civil rights and obligations brought before a court (see e.g. Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 91, ECHR 2001-V). - EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 44759/98
Verletzung des Rechts auf ein faires Verfahren durch überlange Verfahrensdauer; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
The notion of "civil rights and obligations" has an autonomous meaning independent of domestic classification (König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1987, Series A no. 27, § 89 and, more recently, Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, §§ 24-31, ECHR 2001-VII).
- EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77
VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
It is necessary to look beyond the appearances and the language used and to concentrate on the realities of the situation (Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, judgment of 24 June 1982, Series A no. 50, § 38). - EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90
FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
It does not, however, guarantee any particular content for those (civil) "rights" in the substantive law of the Contracting States: the Court may not create through the interpretation of Article 6 § 1 a substantive right which has no legal basis in the State concerned (Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, § 65). - EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
The notion of "civil rights and obligations" has an autonomous meaning independent of domestic classification (König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1987, Series A no. 27, § 89 and, more recently, Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, §§ 24-31, ECHR 2001-VII). - EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87
PHILIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
This was therefore a very different situation from that pertaining in Philis v. Greece (no. 1) (judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209), where there was no obvious justification for intervening in the private contractual relationships between an engineer and his clients to remove the ability to sue for fees directly. - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
The Court recalls that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress as appropriate (see, amongst many authorities, Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66). - EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89
MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
In assessing therefore whether there is a civil "right", the starting point must be the provisions of the relevant domestic law and their interpretation by the domestic courts (Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A, § 49).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,53104) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
No violation of Art. 6 No violation of Art. 13 (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 2010/06
- EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06
This right to a court "extends only to "contestations" (disputes) over (civil) "rights and obligations" which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law; Article 6 § 1 does not in itself guarantee any particular content for (civil) "rights and obligations" in the substantive law of the Contracting States" (see, inter alia, James and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, pp. 46-47, § 81, and Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p.16, § 36). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06
Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 24, § 57; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 44, ECHR 2001 - VIII). - EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80
BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06
Article 6 § 1 will however apply to disputes of a "genuine and serious nature" concerning the actual existence of a right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised (see Benthem v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 15, § 32). - EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87
PHILIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06
The scheme as set up was inefficient and ineffective, the CSA showing itself incapable of taking directed or consistent enforcement actions, being fobbed off readily by the unsophisticated tactics of Mr. K. This placed an excessive and disproportionate burden on her and deprived her of the "essence" of her right, in which respect she relied on Philis v. Greece (no. 1) (judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209).