Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 25599/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 3 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 8 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 14 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 09.09.1996 - 25599/94
- EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 25599/94
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 25599/94
The Court recalls that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see the Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 59, § 30).
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 27.06.2012 - C-245/11
K - Verordnung (EG) Nr. 343/2003 - Bestimmung des Mitgliedstaats, der für die …
Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 09.09.1996 - 25599/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 09.09.1996 - 25599/94
- EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 25599/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1996 - 25599/94
A summary of the domestic law and practice in connection with corporal punishment in private schools is to be found in the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Costello-Roberts case (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, pp. 54, 55, paras. 13 - 16).They contrast the position with that of corporal punishment in school, where States are under an obligation to provide education, and hence have responsibility for matters occurring in school, even in private schools (see Eur. Court HR, Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, pp. 57, 58, paras. 26 - 28).
- EGMR, 13.08.1981 - 7601/76
YOUNG, JAMES ET WEBSTER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1996 - 25599/94
By reference to the Young, James and Webster case (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44), the Government accept responsibility in this context only in relation to the content of the relevant domestic law. - EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84
MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1996 - 25599/94
As to the alleged imprecision of the criterion of reasonable chastisement, the Government recall that it is impossible to attain absolute precision in the framing of laws, particularly in fields in which the situation changes according to the prevailing views of society (see Eur. Court HR, Müller v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, para. 29).