Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 06.09.2016

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,60994
EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,60994)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.11.2007 - 26986/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,60994)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. November 2007 - 26986/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,60994)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,60994) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GALSTYAN v. ARMENIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35... Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
    Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies - art. 6 : time and facilities to prepare defence) No violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-b ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (20)

  • EGMR, 30.09.1985 - 9300/81

    CAN v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    The accused must have the opportunity to organise his defence in an appropriate way and without restriction as to the possibility to put all relevant defence arguments before the trial court and thus to influence the outcome of the proceedings (see Can v. Austria, no. 9300/81, Commission's report of 12 July 1984, Series A no. 96, § 53; Connolly v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27245/95, 26 June 1996; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 78, 20 January 2005).
  • EGMR, 25.07.2000 - 24954/94

    TIERCE ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    By rendering the administration of justice visible, publicity contributes to the achievement of the aim of Article 6 § 1, namely a fair trial, the guarantee of which is one of the fundamental principles of any democratic society, within the meaning of the Convention (see Fejde v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-C, pp. 67-68, § 28; Tierce and Others v. San Marino, nos. 24954/94, 24971/94 and 24972/94, § 92, ECHR 2000-IX).
  • EGMR, 14.11.2000 - 35115/97

    RIEPAN v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    The Court considers that the right to a public hearing would be illusory if a Contracting State's domestic legal system allowed courts to hold hearings which were public in form but would not be in reality accessible to the public, including because of the time and location of the hearing (see, mutatis mutandis, Riepan v. Austria, no. 35115/97, § 29-31, ECHR 2000-XII).
  • EGMR, 10.02.2005 - 69315/01

    SUKHORUBCHENKO v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    Nevertheless, it must be borne in mind that the Convention is intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Sukhorubchenko v. Russia, no. 69315/01, § 43, 10 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

    IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    Furthermore, Article 6 may also be relevant before a case is sent for trial and in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with it (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, § 36; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 131, ECHR 2005-...).
  • EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

    SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    The Court reiterates that the public character of court hearings constitutes a fundamental principle enshrined in Article 6 § 1 (see, among other authorities, Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 19-20, § 58).
  • EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

    POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    The Court reiterates that the requirements of Article 6 § 3 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1. The Court will therefore examine the relevant complaints under both provisions taken together (see, among many other authorities, F.C.B. v. Italy, judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 208-B, p. 20, § 29; Poitrimol v. France, judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-A, p. 13, § 29).
  • EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 12151/86

    F.C.B. c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    The Court reiterates that the requirements of Article 6 § 3 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1. The Court will therefore examine the relevant complaints under both provisions taken together (see, among many other authorities, F.C.B. v. Italy, judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 208-B, p. 20, § 29; Poitrimol v. France, judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-A, p. 13, § 29).
  • EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

    HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    As to the subjective test, the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (see Hauschildt v. Denmark, judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, § 47; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, § 30, ECHR 2000-X).
  • EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

    EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
    The Court recalls, however, that it is not within its province to substitute its own assessment of the facts and the evidence for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, among many other authorities, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34; Bernard v. France, judgment of 23 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, p. 879, § 37).
  • EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

    CARDOT c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75

    ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85

    Oberschlick ./. Österreich

  • EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 12631/87

    FEJDE c. SUÈDE

  • EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94

    ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

    DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

  • EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

    CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 11034/84

    WEBER c. SUISSE

  • EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87

    DEMICOLI v. MALTA

  • EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

    Öztürk ./. Deutschland

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 26986/03, 31553/03, 33268/03, 35944/03, 35738/03, 22571/05, 34320/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,27757
EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 26986/03, 31553/03, 33268/03, 35944/03, 35738/03, 22571/05, 34320/04 (https://dejure.org/2016,27757)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.09.2016 - 26986/03, 31553/03, 33268/03, 35944/03, 35738/03, 22571/05, 34320/04 (https://dejure.org/2016,27757)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. September 2016 - 26986/03, 31553/03, 33268/03, 35944/03, 35738/03, 22571/05, 34320/04 (https://dejure.org/2016,27757)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,27757) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GALSTYAN AND 6 OTHER CASES AGAINST ARMENIA

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GALSTYAN ET 6 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE L'ARMÉNIE

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht