Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAC DONALD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 14+8, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. c MRK
  Struck out of the list (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (20)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 27.09.1999 - 32377/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 301/04

  The Ministry of Defence policy, together with the associated law and practice in force at the relevant time, which led to the investigation and dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces is described in the judgments of the Court in the cases of Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom (nos. 31417/96 and 32377/96, 27 September 1999) and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 1999-VI).

  31417/96 and 32377/96, 25 July 2000 and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (just satisfaction), nos.

• EGMR, 27.09.1999 - 33985/96

  SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 301/04

  The Ministry of Defence policy, together with the associated law and practice in force at the relevant time, which led to the investigation and dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces is described in the judgments of the Court in the cases of Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom (nos. 31417/96 and 32377/96, 27 September 1999) and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 1999-VI).

  33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 2000-IX; Perkins and R. v. the United Kingdom, nos.

• EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 25754/94

  HARAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 301/04

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement) as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; and also Haran v. Turkey, no. 25754/94, judgment of 26 March 2002).
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 43208/98

  PERKINS AND R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 301/04

  43208/98 and 44875/98, 22 October 2002; and Beck, Copp and Bazeley v. the United Kingdom, nos.
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 48535/99

  BECK, COPP AND BAZELEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 301/04

  48535/99, 48536/99 and 48537/99, 22 October 2002).

• EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 22367/04

  B. S.gegen Deutschland

  Zu diesem Zweck prüft der Gerichtshof die Erklärung sorgfältig im Lichte der Kriterien, die sich aus seiner Rechtsprechung ergeben (…siehe Tahsin Acar ./. Türkei [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 26307/95, Rdnr. 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI;… und ebenfalls Haran ./. Türkei , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 25754/94, Rdnr. 23…, Urteil vom 26. März 2002, Akman ./. Türkei (Streichung), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 37453/97, Rdnr. 30-31, ECHR 2001-VI, und Meriakri ./. Republik Moldau (Streichung), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 53487/99, Rdnr. 30-32, 1. März 2005; MacDonald ./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 301/04, 6. Februar 2007; O. ./. Deutschland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 31384/02, 11. September 2007).
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10561/05

  GARFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10563/05

  GARNHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

 
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10569/05

  GRIGGS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10600/05

  MACDONALD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10615/05

  SELF v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10617/05

  STINTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10621/05

  WALTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 40039/03

  ANDERSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 1591/04

  WHEELER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The law and practice in force at the relevant time concerning the dismissal of homosexuals from the armed forces are described in the decision of the Court in the case of MacDonald v. the United Kingdom (no. 301/04, 6 February 2007).

  Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the declaration, the speed and nature of the State's reaction to the afore-mentioned lead judgments in Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (notably through the introduction of The Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct Policy Statement), as well as the amount of compensation proposed, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)) (see, MacDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 301/04 (dec.) February 2007; and, for the relevant principles, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10476/05

  BODEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10540/05

  CHAMBERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10545/05

  DAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10549/05

  DE LA MAZIERE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10610/05

  O'KEEFE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 10555/05

  FITZGERALD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 02.06.2009 - 29705/05

  Recht auf Freiheit der Person und Recht auf Akteneinsicht (Recht auf ein faires …
• EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 771/04

  R. G. gegen Deutschland
• EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 21214/03

  E.H. gegen Deutschland
• EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 34909/04

  P. G. gegen Deutschland