Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 01.10.2020

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,64196
EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,64196)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10.09.2010 - 31333/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,64196)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. September 2010 - 31333/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,64196)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64196) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    McFARLANE c. IRLANDE

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'art. 13 Violation de l'art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - réparation (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    McFARLANE v. IRELAND

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    McFARLANE v. IRELAND - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Sonstiges

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (119)Neu Zitiert selbst (25)

  • EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

    Eckle ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    Since this Court holds a State responsible under the "reasonable time" aspect of Article 6 § 1 for delay by judges in delivering their judgments (see, for example, Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 84, Series A no. 51; O'Reilly v Ireland, no. 21624/93, Commission's report of 22 February 1995, §§ 65-66; Somjee v. the United Kingdom, no. 42116/98, § 72, 15 October 2002; Obasa v. the United Kingdom, no. 50034/99, § 34, 16 January 2003; O'Reilly and Others v. Ireland, no. 54725/00, § 33, 29 July 2004; and McMullen v. Ireland, no. 42297/98, § 39, 29 July 2004), a remedy which does not apply to this form of delay cannot be considered an effective one within the meaning of Article 13 of the Convention.

    In his opinion, the Court should look behind Eckle v. Germany (15 July 1982, Series A no. 51), develop the approach begun in Deweer v. Belgium (27 February 1980, Series A no. 35) and accept that there were special circumstances why the length of the criminal proceedings began at the end of 1983/beginning of 1984 namely, the mala fides and conduct of the prosecution prior to his arrest.

  • EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 46344/06

    RUMPF ET 70 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE L'ALLEMAGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    The Court recalls its constant case law to the effect that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant (for example, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 128, ECHR 2006-VII).

    "Remedies available to a litigant at domestic level for raising a complaint about length of proceedings are "effective"... if they prevent the alleged violation or its continuation, or provide adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 65, ECHR 2006-VII; and Kudla v. Poland, cited above, §§ 157 to 159).

  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).

    In Kudla v. Poland ([GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI) the Court confirmed that the purpose of Article 35 § 1, which sets out the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies, "is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court".

  • EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 54725/00

    O'REILLY AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    Chapter 4 of the Report is entitled "Time-limits and International Obligations" and noted that Ireland had been found in breach of Article 6 of the Convention (McMullen v. Ireland, no. 42297/98, 29 July 2004; Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); O'Reilly and Others v. Ireland, no. 54725/00, 29 July 2004; and Barry v. Ireland, cited above).

    However, the [ECHR] in [O'Reilly and Others v. Ireland, no. 54725/00, 29 July 2004] found that this did not constitute an adequate remedy.

  • EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 42297/98

    McMULLEN v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    Chapter 4 of the Report is entitled "Time-limits and International Obligations" and noted that Ireland had been found in breach of Article 6 of the Convention (McMullen v. Ireland, no. 42297/98, 29 July 2004; Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); O'Reilly and Others v. Ireland, no. 54725/00, 29 July 2004; and Barry v. Ireland, cited above).

    The remedy available before this development was considered by the European Court of Human Rights in the cases of [Barry v Ireland, cited above, Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); O'Reilly v. Ireland, cited above; and McMullen v. Ireland, no. 42297/98, 29 July 2004].

  • EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 50389/99

    DORAN v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    Chapter 4 of the Report is entitled "Time-limits and International Obligations" and noted that Ireland had been found in breach of Article 6 of the Convention (McMullen v. Ireland, no. 42297/98, 29 July 2004; Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); O'Reilly and Others v. Ireland, no. 54725/00, 29 July 2004; and Barry v. Ireland, cited above).

    The remedy available before this development was considered by the European Court of Human Rights in the cases of [Barry v Ireland, cited above, Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); O'Reilly v. Ireland, cited above; and McMullen v. Ireland, no. 42297/98, 29 July 2004].

  • EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 44978/98

    BERLIN ET 7 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LE LUXEMBOURG

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    27928/02 and 31694/02, 21 October 2003; and in Berlin v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 44978/98, 7 May 2002 and Leandro Da Silva v. Luxembourg, cited above.
  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    The consistent approach of this Court as articulated and reiterated by the Grand Chamber in Selmouni v. France ([GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V), has been that the complaint which an applicant intends to make subsequently to this Court must first have been made to the appropriate domestic body.
  • EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

    STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    The applicant did not suggest that any costs order in those actions in favour of the State has been pursued against him so that it is unnecessary to make any provision under Article 41 in that respect (Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 105, ECHR 2005-II).
  • EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

    ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
    33985/96 and 33986/96, § 28, ECHR 2000-IX; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 182, ECHR 2005-X).
  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 02.12.1999 - 32082/96

    Überprüfung der Länge eines in Portugal anhängigen Strafverfahrens durch den

  • EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01

    NOGOLICA c. CROATIE

  • EKMR, 05.03.1990 - 12659/87

    GAMA DA COSTA v. PORTUGAL

  • EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

    PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

  • EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 48215/99

    LUTZ c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57950/00

    ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02

    GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE

  • EGMR, 09.10.2007 - 30132/04

    ILIC v. SERBIA

  • EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 40383/04

    VIDAS v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 47316/99

    Rechtssache F.-N. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  • EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98

    Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete -

  • EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

    MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  • EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 58698/00

    PAULINO TOMAS contre le PORTUGAL

  • EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 30273/07

    LEANDRO DA SILVA c. LUXEMBOURG

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Less than full application of the guarantees of Article 13 in this context would unacceptably weaken the effective functioning, on the national and international level, of the scheme of human rights protection set up by the Convention (see Finger, cited above, § 121, and McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 112, ECHR 2010-..., with further references).
  • EuGH, 05.06.2018 - C-612/15

    Kolev u.a. - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Art. 325 AEUV - Betrügereien oder

    Im Bereich des Strafrechts ist dieses Recht nicht nur im gerichtlichen Verfahren, sondern auch im Ermittlungsverfahren zu beachten, sobald der Betroffene einer Beschuldigung ausgesetzt ist (vgl. entsprechend EGMR, 15. Juli 2002, Affaire stratégies et communications und Dumoulin/Belgien, CE:ECHR:2002:0715JUD003737097, § 39, sowie EGMR, 10. September 2010, McFarlane/Irland, CE:ECHR:2010:0910JUD003133306, § 143).
  • EGMR, 08.09.2011 - 7812/04

    SUPERWOOD HOLDINGS PLC AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

    The Court's recalls its conclusion in McFarlane v. Ireland ([GC], no. 31333/06, § 128, ECHR 2010-...) that such an action did not constitute an effective remedy available in theory and in practice within the meaning of Article 13 in a case concerning the length of criminal proceedings.

    In this respect, the Court recalls in particular that, contrary to the Government's submission, even a principle of domestic law that parties to civil proceedings are required to take the initiative to progress the proceedings, does not dispense a State from the requirement to organise its system to deal with cases within a reasonable period of time: if a State allows proceedings to continue beyond a "reasonable time" without doing anything to advance them, it will be responsible for the resultant delay (Foley v. the United Kingdom, no. 39197/98, § 40, 22 October 2002; Price and Lowe v. the United Kingdom, nos. 43185/98 and 43186/98, § 23, 29 July 2003 as cited in McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 152, ECHR 2010-...).

    [1] McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, 10 September 2010.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 01.10.2020 - 31333/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2020,43030
EGMR, 01.10.2020 - 31333/06 (https://dejure.org/2020,43030)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.10.2020 - 31333/06 (https://dejure.org/2020,43030)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. Oktober 2020 - 31333/06 (https://dejure.org/2020,43030)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43030) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht