Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation des art. 3 et 8 Aucune question distincte au regard de l'art. 13 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 14 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  M.C. v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 and 8 No separate issue under Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

  M. C. gegen Bulgarien

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.12.2002 - 39272/98
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

Wird zitiert von ... (178)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  In interpreting them, since the Convention is first and foremost a system for the protection of human rights, the Court must have regard to the changing conditions within Contracting States and respond, for example, to any evolving convergence as to the standards to be achieved (see Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 74, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  Such a positive obligation cannot be considered in principle to be limited solely to cases of ill-treatment by State agents (see, mutatis mutandis, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, ECHR 2002-I).

• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 61496/08

  Überwachung privater Chatnachrichten des Arbeitnehmers durch den Arbeitgeber

  The Court observes that it has held that in certain circumstances, the State's positive obligations under Article 8 of the Convention are not adequately fulfilled unless it secures respect for private life in the relations between individuals by setting up a legislative framework taking into consideration the various interests to be protected in a particular context (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, cited above, §§ 23, 24 and 27, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII, both concerning sexual assaults of minors; see also K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, §§ 43 and 49, ECHR 2008, concerning an advertisement of a sexual nature placed on an internet dating site in the name of a minor; Söderman, cited above, § 85, concerning the effectiveness of remedies in respect of an alleged violation of personal integrity committed by a close relative; and Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, §§ 102-04, 2 June 2009, concerning medical negligence).
• EuGH, 06.10.2020 - C-511/18

  Rechtsangleichung

  Insbesondere ist ein rechtlicher Rahmen zu schaffen, der es erlaubt, die verschiedenen zu schützenden Interessen und Rechte miteinander in Einklang zu bringen (EGMR, 28. Oktober 1998, 0sman gegen Vereinigtes Königreich, CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002345294, §§ 115 und 116, 4. März 2004, M.C. gegen Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2003:1204JUD003927298, § 151, 24. Juni 2004, Von Hannover gegen Deutschland, CE:ECHR:2004:0624JUD005932000, §§ 57 und 58, sowie 2. Dezember 2008, K.U. gegen Finnland, CE:ECHR:2008:1202JUD 000287202, §§ 46, 48 und 49).
• EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

  Urteil bestätigt Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit …

  Thus, for example, in other contexts, States are required under Article 3 to take measures designed to ensure that individuals within their jurisdiction are not subjected to illtreatment, including such treatment administered by private individuals (see, inter alia, A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 22, Reports 1998-VI; M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149-50, ECHR 2003-XII; and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 159, ECHR 2009).

 
• EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 39630/09

  El Masri klagt gegen Mazedonien

  L'Etat défendeur doit être considéré comme directement responsable de la violation des droits du requérant de ce chef, ses agents ayant activement facilité le traitement litigieux puis s'étant abstenus de prendre pour l'empêcher les mesures qui auraient été nécessaires dans les circonstances de la cause (Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie, no 71156/01, §§ 124-125, 3 mai 2007, Z et autres c. Royaume-Uni, précité, et M.C. c. Bulgarie, no 39272/98, § 149, CEDH 2003-XII).
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 420/07

  Vereinbarkeit einer vom Arbeitgeber angeordneten und durch eine Detektei …

  The choice of the means to secure compliance with Article 8 in the sphere of protection against acts of individuals is, in principle, within the State's margin of appreciation (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 24, Series A no. 91; M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII; and K.U. v. Finland, cited above, § 43).
• EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

  The Court has already held that, in certain circumstances, the fulfilment of positive obligations imposed by Article 8 requires the State to adopt a legislative framework to protect the right at issue (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, §§ 23, 24 and 27, Series A no. 91, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII, concerning cases of sexual assault on minors; and Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, §§ 102-04, 2 June 2009, as regards medical negligence).
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 5786/08

  Gesetzeslücke: Menschenrechtsgerichtshof verurteilt Schweden wegen Nacktaufnahmen

  Le Gouvernement plaide d'emblée que la Cour a déclaré à plusieurs reprises que les Etats jouissent d'une ample marge d'appréciation relativement à la garantie d'une protection adéquate au regard de l'article 8, même dans les cas d'agressions très graves telles que le viol d'une mineure (voir, par exemple, M.C. c. Bulgarie, no 39272/98, § 154, CEDH 2003-XII), et que seules des lacunes importantes dans la législation et la pratique, ou dans leur application, peuvent emporter violation des obligations positives que cette disposition fait peser sur l'Etat.

  X et Y c. Pays-Bas, 26 mars 1985, § 27, série A no 91, et M.C. c. Bulgarie, no 39272/98, §§ 50 et 166, CEDH 2003-XII.

• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 2872/02

  K.U. v. FINLAND

  Si le choix des moyens d'assurer le respect de l'article 8 dans le domaine de la protection contre les actes d'individus relève en principe de la marge d'appréciation de l'Etat, une dissuasion effective contre des actes graves mettant en jeu des valeurs fondamentales et des aspects essentiels de la vie privée appelle des dispositions pénales efficaces (X et Y c. Pays-Bas, §§ 23-24 et 27 ; August c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 36505/02, 21 janvier 2003 ; M.C. c. Bulgarie, no 39272/98, § 150, CEDH 2003-XII).
• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 43002/20

  POGIBKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  The Court reiterates that Article 3 of the Convention requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation of alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII, and Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, § 99, 17 December 2009).
• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 6406/21

  M.G. v. LITHUANIA

  In that connection, the Court emphasises the particular vulnerability of young persons and the special psychological factors involved in cases concerning sexual abuse of minors (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 183, ECHR 2003-XII, and C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692/05, § 81, 20 March 2012).

  In M.C. v. Bulgaria, the Court held that States have a positive obligation inherent in Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention to enact criminal-law provisions effectively punishing rape and to apply them in practice through effective investigation and prosecution (M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 153, ECHR 2003-XII).

• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 38263/08

  GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
• EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14

  Erfasst Art. 4 EMRK auch die Zwangsprostitution?
• EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03

  TYSIAC c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 62903/15

  KURT v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 35810/09

  O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND
• EGMR, 28.05.2015 - 41107/10

  Y. v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

  NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
• VerfGH Saarland, 07.05.2021 - Lv 5/19

  Verfassungsbeschwerde eine jüdischen Bürgers gegen die Einstellung eines …
• EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 38963/18

  V.I. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 25018/10

  IBRAHIM DEMIRTAS c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09

  MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11

  EREMIA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 33234/07

  VALIULIENE v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 45603/05

  BUDINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 61382/09

  B. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 70534/12

  ERDEN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  MEMBERS OF THE GLDANI CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 38588/21

  X v. GREECE
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  KRACHUNOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 30808/11

  A, B AND C v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 6318/17

  M.M.B. v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 27.05.2021 - 5671/16

  J.L. c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 445/10

  J.S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09

  DURDEVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 41138/98

  MOLDOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03

  M. AND OTHERS v. ITALY AND BULGARIA
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 32704/04

  DENIS VASILYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  ABDU c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09

  MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 10853/16

  MYRONYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 7075/10

  AGEYEVY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 12060/12

  M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 39544/05

  ZAGREBACKA BANKA D.D. v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 14.04.2011 - 30060/04

  Erneut Sicherungsverwahrung verurteilt
• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 15798/20

  VUCKOVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 40116/02

  SECIC c. CROATIE
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08

  C.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 12294/07

  ZONTUL c. GRECE
• EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  GJINI v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 55164/08

  A. v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 47358/20

  C. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 19237/16

  ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.04.2019 - 38089/12

  SARWARI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 48475/09

  SAKIR c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 53519/07

  I.G. v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 59255/14

  PYLYPCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 23361/14

  YAKOVIN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 29263/12

  S.Z. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  T.M. AND C.M. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 13424/06

  N.A. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  MUDRIC v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 21.06.2012 - 5786/08

  E.S. v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 71367/12

  OGANEZOVA v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 31454/10

  CWIK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 54227/14

  V.C. c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 839/02

  MASLOVA AND NALBANDOV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 26692/05

  C.A.S. AND C.S. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 9718/03

  GEORGEL AND GEORGETA STOICESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04

  PREMININY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 46423/06

  BEGANOVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 18968/07

  V.C. v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2019 - 7144/15

  A AND B v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 23.01.2014 - 24125/06

  W. v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 3832/06

  M.N. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 2912/11

  KOWAL v. POLAND
• EGMR, 31.01.2012 - 60272/08

  KARAMAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 49669/07

  P.M. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 70930/01

  BLUMBERGA v. LATVIA
• VG Potsdam, 08.06.2022 - 16 K 3097/17
• EGMR, 17.01.2019 - 22457/16

  X ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 27607/11

  A.K. c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.01.2018 - 33349/10

  SIDIROPOULOS ET PAPAKOSTAS c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 23022/13

  D.M.D. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 15529/12

  BALÁZS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 03.07.2014 - 18114/06

  AMADAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 29525/10

  REMETIN v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 22457/08

  M.P. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 25001/07

  STASI c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 02.06.2009 - 31675/04

  CODARCEA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 38478/05

  SANDRA JANKOVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 36777/03

  IRIBARREN PINILLOS c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 20212/13

  KHOMENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 37882/13

  E.G. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  Z v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 10.12.2019 - 71667/17

  KUSIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 31959/13

  PULFER v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 66895/10

  ALKOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 16143/10

  G.U. c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 21528/09

  MARIUS DRAGOMIR c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 49742/09

  BASTÜRK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 16605/09

  N.D. v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 3400/07

  M.A. v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 7446/12

  REMETIN v. CROATIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 41717/09

  STOEV AND OTHERS c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 20558/04

  BUCURESTEANU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 32501/11

  SULEYMANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 43994/05

  E.M. c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 23893/06

  J.L. v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 20558/04

  BUCURESTEANU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42390/07

  B. c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 43982/06

  M.B. c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 37334/08

  G. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 72663/01

  NIKOLAY DIMITROV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 5048/02

  MACOVEI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 41124/02

  FILIP c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 45500/99

  TZEKOV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 12.01.2006 - 35978/02

  MIHAILOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 44394/15

  G.M. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 76805/11

  KRAULAIDIS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 27454/11

  ORLIK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 47936/11

  ÇALiSKAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 33708/12

  I.P. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 2040/12

  CHINEZ v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 769/13

  TOCARENCO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 41694/07

  ISAKOVIC VIDOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 29474/09

  TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07

  TYAGUNOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 42078/02

  ALDER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 26053/07

  DOSSI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 69006/01

  DITABAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 71127/01

  BEVACQUA AND S. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 57885/00

  GERGELY v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 57884/00

  KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• VG Potsdam, 30.06.2021 - 10 K 2485/16

  Somalia: Subsidiärer Schutz wegen drohendem Schaden im Rahmen von Blutrache und …
• EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 22597/16

  R.B. v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 72226/11

  N.P. ET N.I. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 23692/09

  M.C. v. POLAND
• EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 17116/04

  SIZAREV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 37246/06

  MUTA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 19.04.2012 - 26984/05

  GORGIEV v.
• EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 9548/07

  ILIEVA AND GEORGIEVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 11014/05

  SERBAN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 5650/04

  STEFAN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 29785/07

  H. v. ICELAND
• EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 38787/03

  FLORIAN POPA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 14659/02

  WILKINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 21.10.2004 - 71225/01

  K. c. LETTONIE
• EGMR - 33066/22 (anhängig)

  M.D. v. GEORGIA
• EGMR - 31323/19 (anhängig)

  T.V. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 40312/23 (anhängig)

  A.J. v. SPAIN and 1 other applkcation
• EGMR, 26.10.2021 - 41086/12

  A.P. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 61717/16

  R.G. AND N.G. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 07.09.2021 - 27516/14

  M.P. c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 31804/10

  ZALUSKA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 7063/10

  CHUDY-STERNIK v. POLAND AND SPAIN
• EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 22429/05

  KOVAL AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 23880/05

  SALIKHOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 15139/05

  GEDERIM v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 28326/09

  P.F. AND E.F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04

  I.G., AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 26.03.2009 - 36082/02

  RADIONOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2007 - 2893/02

  MANTOG c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 18727/06

  SZULA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 14.03.2006 - 11079/02

  B.c. v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99

  ANGUELOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 38176/02

  SINDICATO DOS PILOTOS DE AVIACAO CIVIL et AUTRES contre le PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 5158/12

  JAKOVLJEVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 11467/15

  S.N. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 21533/07

  KRYAT v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 1661/08

  CHERNAYA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  PELESHOK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 38435/13

  B.V. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 75863/11

  S.M. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 52520/12

  B.J. AND S.J. v. POLAND
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 22695/03

  DEMSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 12338/02

  HUSSAIN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 56069/14

  W.N. c. SUISSE