Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98 und 43579/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NATCHOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14+2, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 2 (décès) Violation de l'art. 2 (manquement à conduire une enquête effective) Aucune question distincte au regard de l'art. 13 Non-violation de l'art. 14+2 (allégation d'un acte de violence raciale) Violation de l'art. 14+2 (absence ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14+2, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 2 (deaths) Violation of Art. 2 (failure to conduct an effective investigation) No separate issue under Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14+2 (alleged act of racial violence) Violation of Art. 14+2 (failure to investigate possible racist motives) ...
Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
- institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Nachova und andere gegen Bulgarien
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98 und 43579/98
- EGMR, 05.04.2017 - 43577/98
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (14)
- EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99
Transnistrien
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among others, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, pp. 64-65, § 161; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 68; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 111, ECHR 2001-III; and Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 26, ECHR 2004-VII). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among others, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, pp. 64-65, § 161; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 68; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 111, ECHR 2001-III; and Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 26, ECHR 2004-VII). - EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
TANLI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among others, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, pp. 64-65, § 161; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 68; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 111, ECHR 2001-III; and Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 26, ECHR 2004-VII).
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99
MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
Compliance with the State's positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention requires that the domestic legal system must demonstrate its capacity to enforce criminal law against those who unlawfully took the life of another, irrespective of the victim's racial or ethnic origin (see Menson and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97
THLIMMENOS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
A failure to make a distinction in the way in which situations that are essentially different are handled may constitute unjustified treatment irreconcilable with Article 14 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
The question to be decided in such cases is the level of just satisfaction, which is a matter to be determined by the Court at its discretion, having regard to what is equitable (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 120, ECHR 2001-V). - EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97
WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
Discrimination is treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
The Grand Chamber reiterates that in certain circumstances, where the events lie wholly, or in large part, within the exclusive knowledge of the authorities, as in the case of the death of a person within their control in custody, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation of, in particular, the causes of the detained person's death (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
In cases concerning the use of force by State agents, it must take into consideration not only the actions of the agents of the State who actually administered the force but also all the surrounding circumstances, including such matters as the relevant legal or regulatory framework in place and the planning and control of the actions under examination (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 46, § 150, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 56-59, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
In cases concerning the use of force by State agents, it must take into consideration not only the actions of the agents of the State who actually administered the force but also all the surrounding circumstances, including such matters as the relevant legal or regulatory framework in place and the planning and control of the actions under examination (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 46, § 150, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 56-59, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93
Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94
ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96
Schießbefehl
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 19841/06
BAGDONAVICIUS ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE
En vertu d'une jurisprudence bien établie, il n'est pas rare que la Grande Chambre « invite, dans certains cas où est dénoncée une discrimination, le gouvernement défendeur à réfuter un grief défendable de discrimination et, s'il ne le fait pas, [à] conclure à la violation de l'article 14 de la Convention'(voir, par exemple, l'arrêt Nachova et autres c. Bulgarie [GC], 6 juillet 2005, no 43577/98 et 43579/98, § 157, CEDH 2005-VII, et plus récemment, D.H. et autres c. République tchèque [GC], 13 novembre 2007, no 57325/00, § 179, CEDH 2007-IV). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 57325/00
D.H. ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Se référant à la jurisprudence de la Cour (Natchova et autres c. Bulgarie, nos 43577/98 et 43579/98, § 167, CEDH 2004) et d'autres organes internationaux, ils affirment que la discrimination n'exige pas une intention et qu'il n'est pas exclu qu'une mesure puisse être jugée discriminatoire sur la base d'éléments de preuve relatifs à son impact (effets préjudiciables disproportionnés sur un groupe particulier), même si elle ne vise pas spécifiquement ce groupe.
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98 |
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Wird zitiert von ... (400)
- EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 22978/05
Gäfgen - Folter bei polizeilicher Vernehmung; Kindesentführung; Geständnis trotz …
Der Gerichtshof erinnert in diesem Zusammenhang daran, dass es nicht seine Aufgabe ist, über die Schwere der Schuld des Einzelnen zu entscheiden (siehe Öneryıldız ./. Türkei [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 48939/99, Rdnr. 116, ECHR 2004-XII, und Nachova u.a. ./. Bulgarien [GK], Individualbeschwerden Nrn. 43577/98 und 43579/98, Rdnr. 147, ECHR 2005-VII) oder die angemessene Strafe für einen Straftäter zu bestimmen, denn es handelt sich hierbei um Angelegenheiten, die in die ausschließliche Zuständigkeit der innerstaatlichen Strafgerichte fallen. - EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 47274/15
Konflikt zwischen Polizei und Fans ungenügend untersucht
Er zieht die Schlussfolgerungen, die seiner Auffassung nach durch die freie Würdigung aller Beweise gestützt werden; dies schließt Rückschlüsse ein, die sich aus den Tatsachen und dem Vortrag der Verfahrensbeteiligten ergeben (siehe Nachova u. a../. Bulgarien [GK],Individualbeschwerden Nrn. 43577/98 und 43579/98, Rdnr. 147, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 55721/07
Britische Soldaten sollen Kriegsverbrechen begangen haben
Il s'agit essentiellement, au travers d'une telle enquête, d'assurer l'application effective des lois internes qui protègent le droit à la vie et, dans les affaires où des agents ou organes de l'Etat sont impliqués, de garantir que ceux-ci aient à rendre des comptes au sujet des décès survenus sous leur responsabilité (Natchova et autres c. Bulgarie [GC], nos 43577/98 et 43579/98, § 110, CEDH 2005-VII).
- EuGH, 16.07.2015 - C-83/14
Die Anbringung von Stromzählern in einer unzugänglichen Höhe in einem Stadtteil, …
Der Begriff der ethnischen Herkunft, der auf dem Gedanken beruht, dass gesellschaftliche Gruppen insbesondere durch eine Gemeinsamkeit der Staatsangehörigkeit, Religion, Sprache, kulturelle und traditionelle Herkunft und Lebensumgebung gekennzeichnet sind, erfasst nämlich auch die Gemeinschaft der Roma (vgl. in diesem Sinne in Bezug auf Art. 14 der Europäischen Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten EGMR , Natchova u. a./Bulgarien, Nrn. 43577/98 und 43579/98, EGMR 2005-VII, sowie Sejdic und Finbci/Bosnien-Herzegovina, Nrn. 27996/06 und 34836/06, §§ 43 bis 45 und 50 , EGMR 2009). - EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 55762/00
TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA
Moreover, the level of persuasion necessary for reaching a particular conclusion and, in this connection, the distribution of the burden of proof, are intrinsically linked to the specificity of the facts, the nature of the allegation made and the Convention right at stake (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 25965/04
RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA
In assessing whether there has been a violation of Article 4, the relevant legal or regulatory framework in place must be taken into account (see, mutatis mutandis, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 93, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Moreover, the level of persuasion necessary for reaching a particular conclusion and, in this connection, the distribution of the burden of proof are intrinsically linked to the specificity of the facts, the nature of the allegation made and the Convention right at stake (see, among others, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 26, ECHR 2004-VII; and Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 168). - EGMR, 28.09.2015 - 23380/09
BOUYID v. BELGIUM
The Court regularly reiterates that it is attentive to the seriousness attaching to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among other authorities, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII; Mathew v. the Netherlands, no. 24919/03, § 156, ECHR 2005-IX; and Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, § 94, ECHR 2014 (extracts)). - EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06
SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE
It is for this reason that the authorities must use all available means to combat racism, thereby reinforcing democracy's vision of a society in which diversity is not perceived as a threat but as a source of enrichment (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 145, ECHR 2005-VII, and Timishev, cited above, § 56). - EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 28761/11
Polen zahlt Schmerzensgeld für Haft in CIA-Gefängnis
The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among other examples, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 161, Series A no. 25; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII; Creanga v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, § 88, 23 February 2012; and El-Masri, cited above, § 151). - EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 38263/08
GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
- EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12
VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10
Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert
- EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 20261/12
Ungarn verstößt gegen Menschenrechtskonvention
- EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 2668/07
DINK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 60561/14
S.M. c. CROATIE
- EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 43868/18
WA BAILE c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 35810/09
O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 34085/17
MUHAMMAD v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 33234/12
Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 7511/13
Polen zahlt Schmerzensgeld für Haft in CIA-Gefängnis
- EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 15250/02
BEKOS AND KOUTROPOULOS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 5418/15
Bootsunglück vor Farmakonisi: Griechenland muss Flüchtlinge entschädigen
- EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
GÜZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 46454/11
Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter
- EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
- EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 26828/06
KURIC ET AUTRES c. SLOVÉNIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35943/10
VONA v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 24.03.2011 - 23458/02
Tod eines Demonstranten beim G-8-Gipfel in Genua
- EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 39611/18
GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (IV)
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10
Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände
- EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 4149/04
AKSU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 1049/17
NIKA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 41237/14
Italien muss Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt entschädigen
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 40094/05
VIRABYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 3566/16
ALKHATIB ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 6884/11
Polizeigewalt bei G8 in Genua 2001: Italien verurteilt
- EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 38590/10
BIAO c. DANEMARK
- EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 40167/06
SARGSYAN c. AZERBAÏDJAN
- EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 8687/08
RAHIMI c. GRECE
- EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 74832/01
MIZIGÁROVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 16760/22
EXECUTIEF VAN DE MOSLIMS VAN BELGIË ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10
SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 71591/17
Prozess gegen SS-Mann Gröning dauerte nicht zu lang
- EGMR, 23.03.2016 - 47152/06
BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.03.2006 - 58278/00
ZDANOKA v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04
SIGMA RADIO TELEVISION LTD v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 8138/16
Bulgarien, minderjährig, Haftbedingungen, Rechtswegerschöpfung, Schadensersatz, …
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23405/16
S.F. c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 03.07.2014 - 37966/07
ANTAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 15529/12
BALÁZS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13
MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE
- EGMR, 05.06.2008 - 32526/05
SAMPANIS ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08
B.S. c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 272/05
VLAEVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 40792/10
FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12
R.B. v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 44803/04
PETROPOULOU-TSAKIRIS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 68007/01
ALIKHADZHIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 46317/99
OGNYANOVA AND CHOBAN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 11.06.2019 - 29309/16
PRIZRENI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 44898/10
JERONOVICS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 48609/06
NENCHEVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 11146/11
HORVÁTH AND KISS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 16.02.2006 - 43233/98
OSMAN c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 42722/02
STOICA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 6383/17
AL-HAWSAWI v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 72126/14
CEESAY v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 24014/05
MUSTAFA TUNÇ ET FECIRE TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 28490/02
BEGHELURI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03
M. AND OTHERS v. ITALY AND BULGARIA
- EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 29226/03
CREANGA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08
ABDU c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 52391/99
RAMSAHAI ET AUTRES c. PAYS-BAS
- EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 57856/11
JELIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06
ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.05.2008 - 7178/03
DEDOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 57325/00
D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32245/19
MACHALIKASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 19237/16
ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 12060/12
M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5774/10
MANDIC AND JOVIC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09
DURDEVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99
BALOGH v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 54363/17
NARAYAN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50275/08
ATAYKAYA c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 8810/05
DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 23944/04
EREMIASOVA AND PECHOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 7888/03
NIKOLOVA AND VELICHKOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99
COBZARU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 3289/10
BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 7524/06
CÜLAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 24329/02
SOARE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 40116/02
SECIC c. CROATIE
- EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 64937/19
ELVAN c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 20914/07
CARTER v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 17247/13
MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. AZERBAIJAN AND HUNGARY
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 13660/05
TEKÇI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 16281/10
AYDAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07
LENEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 14743/11
ABDULKHAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 64301/01
VELCEA ET MAZARE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 25.08.2009 - 23458/02
GIULIANI ET GAGGIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 46598/06
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 55523/00
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 23458/02
GIULIANI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 26307/95
TAHSIN ACAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 40209/20
KOILOVA ET BABULKOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 37801/16
RIBCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 50231/13
SABALIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 21052/18
TERNA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 66490/09
MOCKUTE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 31475/10
ANNENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 10653/10
HUSEYNOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 24359/10
ÖNKOL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 67360/11
HUSEYNLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 44814/07
KADRI BUDAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1774/11
NEMTSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 33234/07
VALIULIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99
IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 173/17
X AND Y v. NORTH MACEDONIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
K.B. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 64418/10
MIHHAILOV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 49037/15
Thomas Karremans
- EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 1443/10
AMARANDEI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 48475/09
SAKIR c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 22931/09
BEHÇET SÖGÜT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 53087/07
MUSTAFA ALDEMIR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 24604/04
NIHAYET ARICI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.04.2012 - 55508/07
JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 23445/03
ESMUKHAMBETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 12573/06
ELLES ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 51210/99
NEHYET GÜNAY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 57941/00
MUSAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03
MATHEW v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 62639/12
DIMITRIOU c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 5886/15
LINGURAR ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11
BORIS KOSTADINOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12
MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 47532/09
HAKIM IPEK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 25690/08
TAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 70555/10
ION BALASOIU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 4494/07
BELOUSOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 71420/01
BEKIRSKI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 72250/01
LOPATA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 28634/06
MAIORANO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 30754/04
DVORACEK AND DVORACKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 12703/02
MUSAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2008 - 29133/03
UTSAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04
BRECKNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 74240/01
GOYGOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 57953/00
BITIYEVA AND X v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 20649/18
R.R. AND R.D. v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31420/11
ÖNAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 21733/12
CERAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 24867/04
FILIPOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 30075/06
ZAMFERESKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 2220/05
VAKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.10.2009 - 21486/06
SATABAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.10.2009 - 1758/04
VAKHAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 67326/01
MEZHIDOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2008 - 1839/04
SANGARIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
AZIYEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 21449/04
CELNIKU c. GRECE
- EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 32478/02
SERGEY SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 60990/14
B.Y. c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07
ADZHIGITOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 24655/18
BARANIN AND VUKCEVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 29729/09
KHAYRULLINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 38287/06
SAHINKUSU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 54765/09
ASKHABOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 43606/04
YOTOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 17185/05
ISKANDAROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.07.2010 - 4149/04
AKSU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.06.2010 - 39676/06
ALAPAYEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2010 - 39685/06
SHAKHABOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 46423/06
BEGANOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 38003/03
RASAYEV AND CHANKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 3019/04
ELMURZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2023 - 59435/17
ALHOWAIS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11
AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 23307/10
TURSUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 67590/10
FOGARASI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 5114/09
KULYKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 7309/04
VEFA SERDAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 60441/13
GÜRTEKIN AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 31890/11
NIZOMKHON DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 28005/08
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 74279/10
LICA c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 1108/02
KOLEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 6844/02
ISIGOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 54169/00
ENZILE ÖZDEMIR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 58701/00
MAKHAURI v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 22494/93
HASAN ILHAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 54588/13
GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 35746/11
SARIBEKYAN AND BALYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 21.12.2017 - 17249/10
GJIKONDI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 73974/14
TSALIKIDIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 26.07.2016 - 68066/12
ADAM v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 41465/09
MUHACIR ÇIÇEK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 42139/12
PISARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 22965/10
YURTSEVER ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.02.2014 - 651/10
MAKBULE KAYMAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 22426/11
PRZEMYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 32520/09
GHIMP AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 16870/03
VIKULOV AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 15492/09
SAKHVADZE v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 5952/07
MASNEVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5903/10
STRUCL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 44614/07
MILANOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 10036/03
BEKTAS AND ÖZALP v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 28975/04
WASILEWSKA AND KALUCKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43326/05
LEONIDIS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 45900/99
YASAROGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 2186/12
YENGIBARYAN AND SIMONYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 45801/19
TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 73204/13
WOMEN'S INITIATIVES SUPPORTING GROUP AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 23914/15
GENDERDOC-M AND M.D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 44765/08
JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 49021/08
SMBAT AYVAZYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12
SATYBALOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07
KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2019 - 71667/17
KUSIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 11244/12
GULYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 19510/15
TOUBACHE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 66895/10
ALKOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 10633/15
TADIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10
RANDELOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 11275/07
MURADYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 26470/10
GÜZELAYDIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 61808/08
GÜVENER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 37158/09
KALKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11
BOACA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 2092/08
MULINI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 57365/12
ANTON c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 679/13
VERETCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 22.01.2015 - 15191/12
KITANOVSKI v.
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09
DMITRIJEVS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 1157/10
KARSAKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 28403/05
VINTMAN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
ATIMAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 32277/07
DEKIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 29604/12
KASYMAKHUNOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 7821/07
DOVLETUKAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 26824/04
KELLER v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 45476/04
SOROKINS AND SOROKINA v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 16117/02
AUSTRIANU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05
DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2012 - 31720/02
TITARENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 23038/07
ÜLÜFER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 36150/04
DAMAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 43710/07
FETISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 13462/06
CESNULEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 1503/02
KHAMZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 17170/04
KERIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 34588/07
DARRAJ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 6458/03
WOLF-SORG c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 32362/02
VISLOGUZOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 5269/02
TANASE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 11818/02
MOJSIEJEW v. POLAND
- EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 44256/06
TURAN CAKIR c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 13670/03
ARZU AKHMADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 6817/02
IORDACHE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 48804/99
OSMANOGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 58643/00
GONCHARUK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 50939/99
BAKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03
ZELILOF v. GREECE
- EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 45500/99
TZEKOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 38595/97
KAKOULLI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
RAMSAHAI AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 57325/00
D.H. ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 4904/20
AL c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 65774/11
SAVEYKINY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2021 - 45322/17
M.B. AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16
YANCHOVICHIN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 24913/15
JABLONSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 10.03.2020 - 58558/13
WARESIAK c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 655/16
LAKATOSOVÁ AND LAKATOS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 24964/09
DZHIOYEVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 2256/09
NANIYEVA AND BAGAYEV v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 37588/12
ETGÜ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 19356/07
SHIOSHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 61170/09
TOPTANIS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 23551/10
ÖZPOLAT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 66953/09
MILEUSNIC ET MILEUSNIC-ESPENHEIM c. CROATIE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09
CIORCAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 69842/10
ALBAKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 21470/10
ERCAN AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 68780/10
GUERDNER ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 64200/13
KORKMAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 64126/13
SARISÜLÜK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 2215/05
ARAPKHANOVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2013 - 24827/05
KÜLAH AND KOYUNCU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.09.2012 - 387/03
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 20546/07
MAKHASHEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 60593/10
KORTESIS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 55822/10
SHAKUROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 34320/04
HAKOBYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 57602/09
NASSAU VERZEKERING MAATSCHAPPIJ N.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06
TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 44862/04
DIMITROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 310/04
SEIDOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 44290/07
SABEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 18183/05
KHAINDRAVA ET DZAMASHVILI c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 23872/04
FADIME AND TURAN KARABULUT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 43418/06
MUTAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 37542/05
ABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 18299/03
FINOGENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 14383/03
SASHOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 29.10.2009 - 17020/05
PARADYSZ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 4860/02
LEPARSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 14.11.2008 - 21586/02
AKHMADOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 34434/02
FOLEA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 70659/01
JUOZAITIENE AND BIKULCIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 36672/97
KURNAZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 68004/01
MAGOMADOV AND MAGOMADOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02
SECIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 54182/00
HALIT CELEBI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 28079/04
GREEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR - 57385/22 (anhängig)
KORKMAZ c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 57165/17
AKGÜN ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 72875/12
TERKOGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 34205/17
KURIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 11464/12
YUKHYMOVYCH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 44841/08
JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 23029/04
SAHISMAIL CAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14
YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)
- EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 53304/18
RAYNOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2019 - 50283/13
FOUNTAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 14.02.2019 - 20295/07
ZORINA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 15014/11
HASAN KÖSE v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 8274/09
KUDUKHOVA v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 27399/17
AHKIM c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 70671/12
VERETCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 43664/16
SHMELEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 3524/14
SARBYANOVA-PASHALIYSKA AND PASHALIYSKA V. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 45115/09
TRAPEZNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 15225/08
ALTIN ET KILIÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14
KAYIPLAR AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
CAKICISOY AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 2228/10
GAMTSEMLIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 8656/10
KASAP AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 61974/11
VOSYLIUS AND VOSYLIENE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 01.08.2013 - 51432/09
SAIDOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 7993/05
MINCULESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04
PUTINTSEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 22932/02
ISMAIL ALTUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 26966/06
ILYASOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 32297/05
ALAUDINOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31365/02
GEORGI DIMITROV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 29.05.2008 - 34561/03
IBRAGIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2008 - 1755/04
GEKHAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 21397/02
DIMITRIE DAN POPESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 25771/03
ALSAYED ALLAHAM v. GREECE
- EGMR, 02.09.2004 - 44041/98
KEMEROV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR - 43194/22 (anhängig)
YASAR c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR - 53117/20 (anhängig)
KORTAK c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 28215/11
BADALYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 63962/19
M.B. AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 39375/19
VALAITIS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 15.07.2021 - 69686/12
YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 24.06.2021 - 31016/17
MEMEDOV v. NORTH MACEDONIA
- EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 12482/14
LUTSENKO AND VERBYTSKYY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 13363/11
TSOROYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 34644/17
ANTONOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 53183/07
NEGREA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 12986/13
TRIVKANOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 50175/12
M. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 63409/11
GRIGORYAN AND SERGEYEVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 18766/04
TSARTSIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 34673/07
DÖNDÜ GÜNEL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 21302/13
TONKEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 26330/12
BLONSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 13524/05
PETRUS IACOB c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 52327/08
YUDINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 31682/07
KHAMZATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.03.2011 - 22102/09
HEIKKINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 28326/09
P.F. AND E.F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 08.07.2010 - 2747/02
VACHKOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 63106/00
VASIL SASHOV PETROV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2010 - 9191/06
SULEYMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 61059/08
KACINARI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01
ESAT BAYRAM v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.01.2009 - 65354/01
TOKMAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.05.2008 - 37315/03
BETAYEV AND BETAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 57935/00
TANGIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 75632/01
EKREM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 17582/05
ARTYOMOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 42329/11
BISAR AYHAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 25414/14
BOPKHOYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 58104/08
SIZOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 33488/04
KHAMBULATOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 69180/01
KARANDJA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43170/04
DZHAMAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 26814/09
MULDER-VAN SCHALKWIJK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98, 43579/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NATCHOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2 Buchst. b, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14+2, Art. 14, Art. 36, Art. 41 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (forclusion) Violation de l'art. 2 en ce qui concerne les décès Violation de l'art. 2 quant à l'absence d'enquête effective Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 2 quant à l'obligation générale de protéger la vie Aucune question distincte ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2 Buchst. b, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14+2, Art. 14, Art. 36, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (estoppel) Violation of Art. 2 with regard to deaths Violation of Art. 2 with regard to lack of effective investigation Not necessary to examine Art. 2 with regard to the general obligation to protect life No separate issue under Art. ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98, 43579/98
- EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 05.04.2017 - 43577/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (22)
- EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 24351/94
AKTAS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
In its approach to questions of evidence and proof, it will have regard to its task under Article 19 of the Convention to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties", but without losing sight of the fact that it is a serious matter for a Contracting State to be found to be in breach of a fundamental right (see, among others, the following judgments: Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 64-65, § 161; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, §§ 109-11, ECHR 2001-III; Aktas v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 272, ECHR 2003-V (extracts)).That is precisely what the Court does when dealing with Article 2 and 3 issues, and I believe the same template should equally be used when the analysis goes to Article 14 taken together with Articles 2 or 3. In those cases the Court investigates the state's responsibility in the death or inhuman treatment etc, and, separately, whether the state has discharged its responsibility in investigating properly a death or an allegation of conduct contrary to Article 3 (vide, e.g., Aktas v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, ECHR 2003-V (extracts), §§ 294, 295, 307, 308, 319, 320, 322 and 323).
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of death or the person responsible will risk falling foul of the required effectiveness standard (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 139, ECHR 2002-IV).This judgement goes a long way to meet the concerns raised in my partly dissenting opinions in Anguelova v. Bulgaria (no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002-IV) and Sevtap VeznedaroÄ?lu v. Turkey (no. 32357/96, 11 April 2000).
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
In the light of the above, the Court considers that in cases where the authorities have not pursued lines of inquiry that were clearly warranted in their investigation into acts of violence by State agents and have disregarded evidence of possible discrimination, it may, when examining complaints under Article 14 of the Convention, draw negative inferences or shift the burden of proof to the respondent Government, as it has previously done in situations involving evidential difficulties (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V and Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 61, ECHR 2002-I).
- EGMR, 11.04.2000 - 32357/96
SEVTAP VEZNEDAROGLU v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
This judgement goes a long way to meet the concerns raised in my partly dissenting opinions in Anguelova v. Bulgaria (no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002-IV) and Sevtap VeznedaroÄ?lu v. Turkey (no. 32357/96, 11 April 2000). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
In the light of the above, the Court considers that in cases where the authorities have not pursued lines of inquiry that were clearly warranted in their investigation into acts of violence by State agents and have disregarded evidence of possible discrimination, it may, when examining complaints under Article 14 of the Convention, draw negative inferences or shift the burden of proof to the respondent Government, as it has previously done in situations involving evidential difficulties (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V and Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 61, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
The question to be decided in such cases is the level of just satisfaction, which is a matter to be determined by the Court at its discretion, having regard to what is equitable (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 120, ECHR 2001-V). - EGMR, 05.02.2002 - 51564/99
Belgien, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Abschiebunghaft, Freiheit …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
In the light of the above, the Court considers that in cases where the authorities have not pursued lines of inquiry that were clearly warranted in their investigation into acts of violence by State agents and have disregarded evidence of possible discrimination, it may, when examining complaints under Article 14 of the Convention, draw negative inferences or shift the burden of proof to the respondent Government, as it has previously done in situations involving evidential difficulties (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V and Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 61, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
TANLI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
In its approach to questions of evidence and proof, it will have regard to its task under Article 19 of the Convention to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties", but without losing sight of the fact that it is a serious matter for a Contracting State to be found to be in breach of a fundamental right (see, among others, the following judgments: Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 64-65, § 161; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, §§ 109-11, ECHR 2001-III; Aktas v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 272, ECHR 2003-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
In its approach to questions of evidence and proof, it will have regard to its task under Article 19 of the Convention to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties", but without losing sight of the fact that it is a serious matter for a Contracting State to be found to be in breach of a fundamental right (see, among others, the following judgments: Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 64-65, § 161; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, §§ 109-11, ECHR 2001-III; Aktas v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 272, ECHR 2003-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97
THLIMMENOS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
A failure to make a distinction in the way in which situations that are essentially different are handled may constitute unjustified treatment irreconcilable with Article 14 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94
ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94
CARAHER contre le ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98
VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96
Schießbefehl
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99
MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI
- EKMR, 06.10.1986 - 11257/84
WOLFGRAM c. ALLEMAGNE
- EKMR, 13.01.1993 - 17579/90
KELLY c. LE ROYAUME-UNI
- EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 28955/95
LAGINHA DE MATOS contre le PORTUGAL
- EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 28518/95
M.D. v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.04.2017 - 43577/98, 43579/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NATCHOVA ET AUTRES CONTRE LA BULGARIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NACHOVA AND OTHERS AGAINST BULGARIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 05.04.2017 - 43577/98, 43579/98
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 43577/98, 43579/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 43577/98, 43579/98
- EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
- EGMR, 05.04.2017 - 43577/98