Weitere Entscheidungen unten: EGMR, 06.03.2014 | EGMR, 04.07.2001

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,21976
EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,21976)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.07.2004 - 48787/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,21976)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Juli 2004 - 48787/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,21976)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,21976) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

In Nachschlagewerken

Sonstiges

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 2005, 1849
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (111)

  • EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 45036/98

    Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi ./. Irland

    The text of Article 1 requires States Parties to answer for any infringement of the rights and freedoms protected by the Convention committed against individuals placed under their "jurisdiction" (see Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 311, ECHR 2004-VII).
  • EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23687/05

    IVANTOC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

    Application no. 48787/99 and the Court's judgment of 8 July 2004.

    The facts concerning the background of application no. 48787/99, including the Transdniestrian armed conflict of 1991-1992 and the period up to late 2003, are set out in Ilascu, Ivantoc, Lesco and Petrov-Popa v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, §§ 28-183, ECHR 2004-VII.

    In a judgment of 8 July 2004 in application no. 48787/99 the Grand Chamber of the Court found that both Moldova and the Russian Federation's responsibility was engaged with regard to the acts complained of and held that there had been violations of various Articles of the Convention (see below, paragraph 12).

    Nevertheless, in the Court's opinion, the Moldovan Government were under a positive obligation under Article 1 of the Convention to take the diplomatic, economic, judicial or other measures that were in their power to take and that were in accordance with international law to secure to the applicants the rights guaranteed by the Convention (Ilascu, Ivantoc, Lesco and Petrov-Popa v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII, §§ 330-331).

    Resolutions of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in the case of Ilascu, Ivantoc, Lesco and Petrov-Popa v. Moldova and Russia, No. 48787/99.

    Referring to the decision in the case of Lyons and Others v. the United Kingdom (8 July 2003, no. 15227/03), they pointed out that in the present case, the Committee of Ministers had not yet completed the proceedings for execution of the Court's judgment in case no. 48787/99 and that the monitoring of that issue involved a dialogue between the authorities of the Russian Federation and the Council of Europe.

    Moreover, they submitted that the Court cannot deal with an application that was substantially the same as a matter that had already been examined by the Court and claimed that there were hardly any new facts in the present application compared to application no. 48787/99.

    The Court must therefore ascertain whether the present application relies on the same facts as application no. 48787/99 in the case of Ilascu, Ivantoc, Lesco and Petrov-Popa v. Moldova and Russia.

    The Court notes that in its judgment of 8 July 2004 concerning application no. 48787/99, it found, inter alia, a violation of Article 5 of the Convention on account of the unlawful and arbitrary detention of the applicants, and stated that "any continuation of the unlawful and arbitrary detention of the three applicants would necessarily entail a serious prolongation of the violation of Article 5 found by the Court and a breach of the respondent States" obligation under Article 46 § 1 of the Convention to abide by the Court's judgment" (§ 490).

    In this context, the Court notes that in its Interim Resolution 2007(106) adopted on 12 July 2007, the Committee of Ministers decided to suspend the examination of the case Ilascu, Ivantoc, Lesco and Petrov-Popa v. Moldova and Russia (application no. 48787/99) and to "resume it after the final determination of the new application [no. 23687/05] by the European Court of Human Rights".

    The Court"s assessment in application no. 48787/99.

    The Court"s assessment in application no. 48787/99.

    The applicants complained of their continued detention after the Court had delivered its judgment in the Ilascu, Ivantoc, Lesco and Petrov-Popa case (application no. 48787/99) on 8 July 2004 and of a lack of effective remedies in this respect.

    I regret to have to express my profound disagreement with the present judgment, as I did in the Grand Chamber's Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia judgment ([GC], no. 48787/99, 8 July 2004, ECHR 2004-VII).

  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 8139/09

    Othman (Abu Qatada) ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    It would be unreasonable if that applicant could not then rely on Article 5 to prevent his extradition (see, mutatis mutandis, Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, §§ 51-56, 24 March 2005; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, §§ 461-464, ECHR 2004-VII).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 48787/99, 23687/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,56047
EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 48787/99, 23687/05 (https://dejure.org/2014,56047)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.03.2014 - 48787/99, 23687/05 (https://dejure.org/2014,56047)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. März 2014 - 48787/99, 23687/05 (https://dejure.org/2014,56047)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,56047) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    AFFAIRES ILASCU ET AUTRES ET IVANTOC ET AUTRES CONTRE LA REPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET LA RUSSIE

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans le règlement amiable (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CASES OF ILASCU AND OTHERS AND IVANTOC AND OTHERS AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)

  • EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 17126/02

    LIKVIDEJAMA P/S SELGA AND VASILEVSKA v. LATVIA

    Because it is a part of its territory, Moldova has "a positive obligation under Article 1 of the Convention to take the diplomatic, economic, judicial or other measures that it is in its power to take and are in accordance with international law to secure to the applicants the rights guaranteed by the Convention (see Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 331, ECHR 2004-VII, and also Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687/05, § 105, 15 November 2011).
  • EGMR - 8064/11 (anhängig)

    SAMATOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

    Does the applicant come within the jurisdiction of Moldova and/or Russia within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention as interpreted by the Court, inter alia, in the cases of Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], (No. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII, Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011 and Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts)) on account of the circumstances of the present case?.
  • EGMR - 73942/17 (anhängig)

    HALABUDENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

    Eu égard aux circonstances de l'espèce, le requérant relève-t-il de la «juridiction» de la Moldova et/ou de la Russie au sens de l'article 1 de la Convention, selon l'interprétation qu'a donnée la Cour de cette notion notamment dans les affaires Ila??cu et autres c. Moldova et Russie ([GC], no 48787/99, CEDH 2004 VII), Catan et autres c. Moldova et Russie ([GC] (nos 43370/04, 8252/05 et 18454/06, 19 October 2012), et Mozer c. République de Moldova et Russie ([GC], no 11138/10, ECHR 2016) ?.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.07.2001 - 48787/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,25993
EGMR, 04.07.2001 - 48787/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,25993)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.07.2001 - 48787/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,25993)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. Juli 2001 - 48787/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,25993)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,25993) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

    DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2001 - 48787/99
    It has also been established that it is for the State relying on the rule to prove that accessible and sufficient domestic remedies exist (see the De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 18, § 36, and the Akdivar and Others v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 68).
  • EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

    LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2001 - 48787/99
    The Moldovan Government relied in this connection on the Commission's decision of 10 July 1978 in the case of Cyprus v. Turkey (application no. 8007/77) and the Court's judgment in the case of Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections) (judgment of 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310).
  • EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

    BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2001 - 48787/99
    The Court reiterates that in order to establish the legal character of such a declaration, one must look behind the title given to it and seek to determine the substantive content (see the Belilos v. Switzerland judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, p. 24, § 49) or the intention of the respondent government (Temeltasch v. Switzerland, application no. 9116/80, Commission's report of 5 May 1982, Decisions and Reports (DR) 31, p. 147, § 73).
  • EGMR, 12.12.2001 - 52207/99

    V. und B. B., Ž. S., M. S., D. J. und D. S. gegen Belgien, Dänemark, …

    Die Beschwerdeführer behaupten, dass diese Sichtweise gänzlich mit der derzeitigen Konventionsrechtsprechung übereinstimme, wobei sie insbesondere die Zulässigkeitsentscheidungen in den vorgenannten Sachen Issa, Xhavara und Öcalan sowie die in der Sache Ilascu (Ilascu ./. Moldawien und Russische Föderation (Entsch.), Nr. 48787/99 vom 4. Juli 2001, nicht veröffentlicht) ergangene Entscheidung zitieren.
  • EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 25303/08

    STOJKOVIC c. FRANCE ET BELGIQUE

    La Cour rappelle que si, en application de l'article 1 de la Convention, il appartient aux Hautes Parties contractantes d'assurer le respect des droits garantis par la Convention et ses Protocoles au profit des personnes relevant de leur juridiction, cette responsabilité peut entrer en jeu à l'occasion d'actes émanant de leurs organes mais déployant leurs effets en dehors de leur territoire (voir, entre autres, Drozd et Janousek c. France et Espagne, 26 juin 1992, § 91, série A no 240, et Ilascu c. Moldavie et Russie [GC] (déc.), 4 juillet 2001, no 48787/99).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht