Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review;Review of lawfulness of detention);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SHER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (17)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 74336/01

  Rechtswidrige Durchsuchung einer Anwaltskanzlei zur Erlangung elektronisch …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 5201/11

  Elements taken into consideration are, in particular, whether the search was undertaken pursuant to a warrant issued by a judge and based on reasonable suspicion; whether the scope of the warrant was reasonably limited; and - where the search of a lawyer's office was concerned - whether the search was carried out in the presence of an independent observer in order to ensure that materials subject to professional secrecy were not removed (see Robathin, cited above, § 44; and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, § 57, ECHR 2007-IV).

• EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 29094/09

  A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  It has further considered, in light of the distribution of the burden of proof in cases where the respondent Government claims non-exhaustion (see Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 132 with further references, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), whether - on the basis of the Government's submissions regarding the further appeal to the Administrative Jurisdiction Division, which have not been disputed by the applicant - the Government's objection should be allowed.
• EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 63638/14

  POSEVINI v. BULGARIA

  The specificity of the items subject to seizure varies from case to case depending on the nature of the offence being investigated (see Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 174, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).

  The sufficiency of the description of the items to be seized will certainly vary from case to case, depending on all the relevant circumstances, such as the place to be searched and the nature of the allegations (see Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 174, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 15.10.2020 - 80982/12

  MUHAMMAD ET MUHAMMAD c. ROUMANIE

  Accordingly, Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 should not be applied in such a manner as to put disproportionate difficulties in the way of the competent authorities in taking effective measures to counter terrorism and other serious crimes, in the discharge of their duty under Article 2, Article 3 and Article 5 § 1 of the Convention to protect the right to life and the right to bodily security of members of the public (see, mutatis mutandis, Sher and Others v. United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts), and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.

 
• EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 35614/19

  ILERDE AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE

  It further reiterates that it is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy in question was available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaint and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Vuckovic, cited above, § 77, and Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 132, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 19699/18

  AKGÜN c. TURQUIE

  Après avoir exposé la jurisprudence de la Cour quant à l'appréciation de soupçons plausibles en matière d'infractions terroristes (Sher et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 5201/11, CEDH 2015 (extraits), Murray c. Royaume-Uni, 28 octobre 1994, série A no 300 A, et Klass et autres c. Allemagne, 6 septembre 1978, série A no 28), il fait remarquer que la Cour a admis que l'utilisation d'informations confidentielles est essentielle dans la lutte contre la violence terroriste et que le terrorisme organisé représente une menace pour la vie des citoyens et pour la société démocratique dans son ensemble.
• EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 66357/14

  PODESCHI v. SAN MARINO

  Although it is not always necessary that an Article 5 § 4 procedure be attended by the same guarantees as those required under Article 6 for criminal or civil litigation, it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the type of deprivation of liberty in question (see A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, § 203, ECHR 2009 with further references to the Court's case-law and Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 147, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 59133/11

  FERNANDES PEDROSO c. PORTUGAL

  Celui-ci doit en principe se voir communiquer les preuves en question afin de pouvoir contester les motifs avancés par les autorités (Sher et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 5201/11, § 148, CEDH 2015 (extraits)).
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 27153/07

  CACUCI AND S.C. VIRRA & CONT PAD S.R.L. v. ROMANIA

  Elements taken into consideration are, in particular: whether the search was undertaken pursuant to a warrant issued by a judge and based on reasonable suspicion; the circumstances in which the search warrant was issued, in particular the further evidence available at that time; whether the scope of the warrant was reasonably limited; and the manner in which the search was carried out, including the presence of independent observers during the search in order to ensure that materials subject to professional secrecy were not removed (see, inter alia, Smirnov, cited above, § 44, and, mutatis mutandis, Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 172, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 19.05.2016 - 37289/12

  J.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  States are therefore dispensed from answering before an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system and those who wish to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court as concerns complaints against a State are thus obliged to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see, amongst many authorities, Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 130, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327/11, § 137, 28 October 2014).
• EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 28349/11

  YESIL v. TURKEY

  Accordingly, the Court concludes that both the initial and the actual search of the applicant's house constituted interferences with his right to respect for his private life and home (see Zosymov v. Ukraine, no. 4322/06, § 59, 7 July 2016, and Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 171, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 69762/12

  BUDAK v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 28926/10

  VINKS AND RIBICKA v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 10112/16

  AL HUSIN v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 32394/11

  TAZIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.06.2021 - 46176/14

  SIMOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA
• EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 64367/14

  TIMES NEWSPAPERS LIMITED AND KENNEDY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  SUPRUNENKO v. RUSSIA