Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00, 61920/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,35359) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUCKHOF and SPANNER v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00
- EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00, 61920/00
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 15809/02
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Kriterien für eine …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
By a decision of 1 June 2006 the Court decided to adjourn the proceedings pending the outcome of the Grand Chamber proceedings in O"Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom (nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02).The Court observes that it has recently examined the case of O"Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, ECHR 2007-...), raising similar issues.
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00
Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
In O"Halloran and Francis (cited above) the Court, having given a detailed summary of its case-law (namely, Funke, cited above; John Murray, cited above; Saunders v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI; Serves v. France, judgment of 20 October 1997, Reports 1997-VI; Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, ECHR 2000-XII; Weh v. Austria, no. 38544/97, 8 April 2004; Shannon v. the United Kingdom, no. 6563/03, 4 October 2005; and Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, ECHR 2006-...) found as follows:. - EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 6563/03
Schweigerecht und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Grundsätze des Schutzes gemäß Art. 6 …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
In O"Halloran and Francis (cited above) the Court, having given a detailed summary of its case-law (namely, Funke, cited above; John Murray, cited above; Saunders v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI; Serves v. France, judgment of 20 October 1997, Reports 1997-VI; Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, ECHR 2000-XII; Weh v. Austria, no. 38544/97, 8 April 2004; Shannon v. the United Kingdom, no. 6563/03, 4 October 2005; and Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, ECHR 2006-...) found as follows:.
- EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 31827/96
Verstoß gegen die Grundsätze des fairen Verfahrens wegen des Zwangs der Vorlegung …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
The Government distinguished the present case from cases in which the Court found a violation of the right to remain silent and the privilege against self-incrimination (in particular, Funke v. France, judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A, and J.B. v. Switzerland, no. 31827/96, ECHR 2001-III) in that the applicants" choice was not limited to either remaining silent and having a fine imposed on them or incriminating themselves. - EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
The question of the use of the statements in criminal proceedings did not arise, as his refusal to make a statement was not used as evidence: it constituted the offence itself (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 10828/84
FUNKE v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
The Government distinguished the present case from cases in which the Court found a violation of the right to remain silent and the privilege against self-incrimination (in particular, Funke v. France, judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A, and J.B. v. Switzerland, no. 31827/96, ECHR 2001-III) in that the applicants" choice was not limited to either remaining silent and having a fine imposed on them or incriminating themselves. - EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 34720/97
HEANEY ET McGUINNESS c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
In O"Halloran and Francis (cited above) the Court, having given a detailed summary of its case-law (namely, Funke, cited above; John Murray, cited above; Saunders v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI; Serves v. France, judgment of 20 October 1997, Reports 1997-VI; Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, ECHR 2000-XII; Weh v. Austria, no. 38544/97, 8 April 2004; Shannon v. the United Kingdom, no. 6563/03, 4 October 2005; and Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, ECHR 2006-...) found as follows:.
- EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 13201/05
Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Voraussetzungen für belastende Schlüsse aus dem …
36. In O'Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom (GC) (nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, §§ 55-63, ECHR 2007"VIII) and, subsequently, in Lückhof and Spanner (nos. 58452/00 and 61920/00, §§ 52-59, 10 January 2008), the Court found that the obligation for the registered keeper of the vehicle to disclose, on pain of a fine, who had been the driver at the time when a traffic offence was committed did not violate the right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination.
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00, 61920/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,39316) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUCKHOF and SPANNER v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00, 61920/00
- EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 31827/96
Verstoß gegen die Grundsätze des fairen Verfahrens wegen des Zwangs der Vorlegung …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00
The Government distinguished the present case from cases in which the Court found a violation of the right to remain silent and the privilege against self-incrimination (in particular Funke v. France, judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A, and, as a recent authority, J.B. v. Switzerland, no. 31827/96 ECHR 2001-III) in that the applicant's choice was not limited to either remaining silent and having a fine imposed on him or incriminating himself. - EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00
In a recent case, concerning an obligation to the disclose one's assets to the tax authorities, the Court found that the privilege against self-incrimination did not provide a general immunity for to actions motivated by the desire to evade investigation by the authorities (see Allen v. the United Kindgom (dec.), no.76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 10828/84
FUNKE v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00
The Government distinguished the present case from cases in which the Court found a violation of the right to remain silent and the privilege against self-incrimination (in particular Funke v. France, judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A, and, as a recent authority, J.B. v. Switzerland, no. 31827/96 ECHR 2001-III) in that the applicant's choice was not limited to either remaining silent and having a fine imposed on him or incriminating himself.