Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,5356
EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,5356)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.03.2016 - 5878/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,5356)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. März 2016 - 5878/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,5356)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,5356) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Partiellement irrecevable;Non-violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2-1 - Enquête efficace) (Volet procédural) (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (147)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    Furthermore, the inquiry required by the coroner of the jury in this case was significantly more demanding than that sought from, and given by, the jury in both Bubbins v. the United Kingdom no. 50196/99, ECHR 2005-II and McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, and in those cases this Court had found that the procedural obligations under Article 2 of the Convention had been met.

    "[T]he use of force by agents of the State in pursuit of one of the aims delineated in paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Convention may be justified under this provision where it is based on an honest belief which is perceived, for good reasons, to be valid at the time but which subsequently turns out to be mistaken" (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 200, Series A no. 324, emphasis added; see also: Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, § 192, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI; Brady v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 55151/00, 3 April 2001; Bubbins v. the United Kingdom, no. 50196/99, §§ 138 and 139, ECHR 2005-II; and Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 178-179, ECHR 2011; see also the concurring opinion of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque in Trévalec v. Belgium, no. 30812/07, 14 June 2011).".

  • EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 50196/99

    BUBBINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    Furthermore, the inquiry required by the coroner of the jury in this case was significantly more demanding than that sought from, and given by, the jury in both Bubbins v. the United Kingdom no. 50196/99, ECHR 2005-II and McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, and in those cases this Court had found that the procedural obligations under Article 2 of the Convention had been met.

    "[T]he use of force by agents of the State in pursuit of one of the aims delineated in paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Convention may be justified under this provision where it is based on an honest belief which is perceived, for good reasons, to be valid at the time but which subsequently turns out to be mistaken" (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 200, Series A no. 324, emphasis added; see also: Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, § 192, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI; Brady v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 55151/00, 3 April 2001; Bubbins v. the United Kingdom, no. 50196/99, §§ 138 and 139, ECHR 2005-II; and Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 178-179, ECHR 2011; see also the concurring opinion of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque in Trévalec v. Belgium, no. 30812/07, 14 June 2011).".

  • EGMR, 14.09.2004 - 56558/00

    OLAH v. HUNGARY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    Consequently, in those Article 2 cases in which the Court specifically addressed the question of whether a belief was perceived, for good reasons, to be valid at the time, it did not adopt the standpoint of a detached observer; instead, it attempted to put itself into the position of the person who used lethal force, both in determining whether that person had the requisite belief and in assessing the necessity of the degree of force used (see, for example, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2004-XI; Oláh v. Hungary (dec.), 56558/00, 14 September 2004 and Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 189 ).
     
  • EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 55151/00

    BRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    "[T]he use of force by agents of the State in pursuit of one of the aims delineated in paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Convention may be justified under this provision where it is based on an honest belief which is perceived, for good reasons, to be valid at the time but which subsequently turns out to be mistaken" (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 200, Series A no. 324, emphasis added; see also: Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, § 192, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI; Brady v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 55151/00, 3 April 2001; Bubbins v. the United Kingdom, no. 50196/99, §§ 138 and 139, ECHR 2005-II; and Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 178-179, ECHR 2011; see also the concurring opinion of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque in Trévalec v. Belgium, no. 30812/07, 14 June 2011).".
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    However, disclosure or publication of police reports and investigative materials may involve sensitive issues with possible prejudicial effects on private individuals or other investigations and, therefore, cannot be regarded as an automatic requirement under Article 2. The requisite access of the public or the victim's relatives may therefore be provided for in other stages of the procedure (see, among other authorities, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III and Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 304).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

    Opuz ./. Türkei

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating a use of lethal force may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see McKerr, cited above, §§ 111 and 114, and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 150, ECHR 2009).
  • EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

    MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    Consequently, in those Article 2 cases in which the Court specifically addressed the question of whether a belief was perceived, for good reasons, to be valid at the time, it did not adopt the standpoint of a detached observer; instead, it attempted to put itself into the position of the person who used lethal force, both in determining whether that person had the requisite belief and in assessing the necessity of the degree of force used (see, for example, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2004-XI; Oláh v. Hungary (dec.), 56558/00, 14 September 2004 and Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 189 ).
  • EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94

    CARAHER contre le ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    The issue did arise in Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000-I, in which the Court found that the approach taken by the domestic judge was compatible with the principles established in McCann and Others.
  • EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    For an investigation into alleged unlawful killing by State agents to be effective, it may generally be regarded as necessary for the persons responsible for and carrying out the investigation to be independent from those implicated in the events (see, for example, Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III; Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 300; Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 177).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
    Although the failure to comply with such an obligation may have consequences for the right protected under Article 13, the procedural obligation of Article 2 is seen as a distinct obligation (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 2000-VII; Öneryildiz, cited above, § 148, and Silih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 153-154, 9 April 2009).
  • EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

    GÜL v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

    AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

    KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  • EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 47274/15

    Konflikt zwischen Polizei und Fans ungenügend untersucht

    Nichtsdestotrotz hängt es von den Umständen des konkreten Falls ab, welcher Art und welchen Ausmaßes die Prüfung sein muss, damit sie die Mindestanforderungen an effektive Ermittlungen erfüllt, und dies muss auf der Grundlage aller erheblichen Tatsachen und unter Berücksichtigung der praktischen Gegebenheiten der Ermittlungsarbeit beurteilt werden (siehe Armani da Silva./. Vereinigtes Königreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 5878/08, Rdnr. 233 und 234, ECHR 2016, mit weiteren Nachweisen).
  • EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 60561/14

    S.M. c. CROATIE

    In the context of Articles 2 and 3, the Court has held that any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its capability of establishing the circumstances of the case or the person responsible is liable to fall foul of the required measure of effectiveness (see, in the context of Article 2, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 113, ECHR 2005-VII, and Armani da Silva, v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 233 in fine, 30 March 2016; see also, in the context of Article 3, Denis Vasilyev, cited above, § 100, and Milena Felicia Dumitrescu, cited above, § 52).

    Furthermore, although the domestic courts have considerable discretion in choosing the appropriate sanction for serious human rights violations, the Court retains a certain measure of supervision and has the possibility to intervene in cases where there is a clear disproportion between the offence committed and the sanction imposed (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom, no. 5878/08, § 285, 30 March 2016; see also Kasap and Others v. Turkey, no. 8656/10, §§ 60-62, 14 January 2014; Darraj v. France, no. 34588/07, § 49, 4 November 2010; Kopylov v. Russia, no. 3933/04, § 141, 29 July 2010; and Chowdury and Others, cited above, §§ 124-27).

  • EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 33234/12

    Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter

    10865/09 and 2 others, § 317, ECHR 2014 (extracts), Cestaro v. Italy, no. 6884/11, §§ 205-208, 7 April 2015; Nasr and Ghali, cited above, § 262; see also Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 233, ECHR 2016).

    Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, ECHR 2016.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht