Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WITHEY contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WITHEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (36) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 13.05.2003 - 62960/00
ANTOINE contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00
More recently, the Court has found that criminal proceedings ended when the prosecution informed the accused that it had discontinued the proceedings against him (Slezevicius v. Lithuania, no. 55479/00, § 27, 13 November 2001, unreported) and when a domestic court found that an accused was unfit to stand trial by reason of his psychiatric condition (Antoine v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 62960/00, ECHR 2003-...), even though in both cases there remained a theoretical possibility that the accused could one day be proceeded against on the relevant charges. - EKMR, 03.10.1979 - 8233/78
X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00
Conversely, it is also the case that such proceedings would end with an official notification to the accused that he or she was no longer to be pursued on those charges such as would allow a conclusion that the situation of that person could no longer be considered to be substantially affected (X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8233/78, Commission decision of 3 October 1979, §§ 64 and 65, unreported). - EGMR, 05.11.1981 - 7215/75
X v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00
For the reasons of convenience, the present decision will continue to refer to Mr Withey as "the applicant", although his wife is today to be regarded as having this status (X v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 5 November 1981, Series A no. 46, § 32).
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00
Accordingly, criminal proceedings are said to have begun with "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", a definition that also corresponds to the test of whether "the situation of the [suspect] has been substantially affected" (Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 73). - EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62
Stögmüller ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00
The Court recalls that one of the purposes of the right to trial within a reasonable period of time is to protect individuals from "remaining too long in a state of uncertainty about their fate" (Stögmüller v. Austria, judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, § 5). - EGMR, 31.03.1992 - 18020/91
X c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00
It considers that the applicant's wife has a legitimate and sufficient interest to pursue the application (for example, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, § 37; X v. France, judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, §§ 26 and 27). - EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75
DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00
It considers that the applicant's wife has a legitimate and sufficient interest to pursue the application (for example, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, § 37; X v. France, judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, §§ 26 and 27).
- BGH, 14.10.2015 - 1 StR 56/15
Fall Mollath: Revision des Angeklagten als unzulässig verworfen
Art. 6 MRK garantiert bereits nicht das Recht auf ein bestimmtes Ergebnis eines Strafverfahrens, etwa nicht auf Verurteilung oder Freispruch wegen einer angeklagten Straftat (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 26. August 2003 - 59493/00 - Withey/Vereinigtes Königreich; Urteil vom 3. Dezember 2009 ? 8917/05 ? Kart/Türkei, NJOZ 2011, 619, 621). - EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 44898/10
JERONOVICS v. LATVIA
He reiterated that in the present case the reopening of the criminal proceedings based on sections 655 to 657 of the Criminal Procedure Law was not to be regarded as "an extraordinary remedy" (he referred to Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X), but in fact appeared to be the only remedy available to him by which to obtain redress for the breach of his rights enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention.The Court also reiterates that, according to its established case-law, an application for the reopening of proceedings or the use of similar extraordinary remedies cannot, as a general rule, be taken into account for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, for instance, Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X, and H. v. Iceland, cited above, with further references).
"The Court also reiterates that, according to its established case-law, an application for the reopening of proceedings or the use of similar extraordinary remedies cannot, as a general rule, be taken into account for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, for instance, Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X, and H. v. Iceland, cited above, with further references).
- EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 71591/17
Prozess gegen SS-Mann Gröning dauerte nicht zu lang
Elsewhere, a trial judge's order to leave the charges on the file was considered to have ended the criminal proceedings for the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention (see Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X).
- EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 37972/05
J. N. ./. Deutschland
Der Gerichtshof erinnert daran, dass das Recht auf ein Verfahren innerhalb angemessener Frist den Einzelnen u.a. davor schützen soll, dass er "über sein Schicksal zu lange im Ungewissen bleibt" (siehe Withey ./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X, und Stögmüller ./. Österreich , Urteil vom 10. November 1969, Serie A Band 9, Rdnr. 5).Im Hinblick auf die Rüge des Beschwerdeführers, dass der in Artikel 6 Abs. 2 der Konvention verankerte Grundsatz der Unschuldsvermutung durch den Einstellungsbeschluss des Amtsgerichts verletzt worden sei, erinnert der Gerichtshof zunächst daran, dass dieser Grundsatz nicht dadurch untergraben ist, dass das Strafverfahren gegen den Beschwerdeführer ohne einen förmlichen Freispruch endete (siehe Withey ./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X).
- EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 44418/07
PONCELET c. BELGIQUE
Le fait que des poursuites pénales dirigées contre un accusé ne soient pas conclues par une telle décision expresse ne constitue pas une atteinte à la présomption d'innocence (Withey c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 59493/00, 26 août 2003). - EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 8917/05
Kart ./. Türkei
Dès lors, le fait que les poursuites pénales ne se sont pas conclues par une telle décision expresse ne constitue pas une atteinte à la présomption d'innocence (Withey c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 59493/00, CEDH 2003-X). - EGMR, 04.08.2005 - 77517/01
STOIANOVA ET NEDELCU c. ROUMANIE
There was not merely a theoretical possibility that the prosecution would pursue the charge (contrast Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X): it was open to the prosecution to reopen the criminal investigation without having to seek leave from any domestic court that would have been obliged to consider the application according to certain criteria, including the fairness of reopening the case and whether an excessive period had passed since the decision discontinuing the investigation (contrast Withey, cited above). - EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 2156/10
M v. THE NETHERLANDS
At all events, Article 6 does not guarantee a particular outcome of criminal proceedings (see Whitey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X). - EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 3503/06
FILEVA v. BULGARIA
That decision is apparently not subject to judicial review (contrast with Withey v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X). - EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 13364/05
KECHEV c. BULGARIE
Quand à la fin de la période à examiner, la Cour rappelle qu'il y a lieu de considérer les poursuites comme terminées en cas de notification officielle informant le prévenu qu'il ne sera plus poursuivi à raison des charges visées (Withey c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 59493/00, CEDH 2003-X, Asenov c. Bulgarie, no 42026/98, §§ 103 et 104, 15 juillet 2005, et Kalpatchka c. Bulgarie, no 49163/99, §§ 65 et 66, 2 novembre 2006). - EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 40899/05
H. M. gegen Deutschland
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 49163/99
KALPACHKA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 36404/97
SOINI AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 54479/00
GUZEL c. TURQUIE (I)
- EGMR, 15.09.2005 - 50899/99
YORDANOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 60261/00
CALISLAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 40306/09
ÜNSAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.04.2018 - 11946/11
DIMITRAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 59588/12
BÉRES AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 29785/07
H. v. ICELAND
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03
GEORGI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 34740/03
BOZLAK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 17129/02
ISAK TEPE c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 47297/99
BÜLBÜL v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.08.2006 - 57883/00
PETROV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 01.09.2005 - 74306/01
OKTEM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 8599/02
GRABCHUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 46947/99
KOC ET TAMBAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 74798/01
KARAKAS et BAYIR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 19127/09
DE L'AUVRE ET DE L`AUVRE S.A. c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 7022/02
LAZAR c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 33506/05
R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 01.09.2005 - 38413/02
GUNES v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.07.2005 - 42026/98
ASENOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 08.03.2005 - 74850/01
TUNCER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 65849/01
GÜZEL c. TURQUIE (N° 2)