Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VRONCHENKO v. ESTONIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Vronchenko v. Estonia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09
• EGMR, 09.11.2016 - 59632/09

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EuGH, 16.06.2005 - C-105/03

  DER GERICHTSHOF BEJAHT DIE ANWENDUNG DES GRUNDSATZES DER …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  In a judgment of 7 March 2007 (case no. 3-1-1-125-06) the Supreme Court dealt with the applicability of the framework decision of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings of the Council of the European Union (200/220/JHA) and the Pupino judgment of the European Court of Justice (Case C-105/03 Pupino [2005] ECR I-5285).

  In a judgment of 16 June 2005 (Case C-105/03 Pupino [2005] ECR I-5285) the Court of Justice of the European Union held:.

• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren: …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  For this reason, the Court considers it appropriate to examine the complaints under the two provisions taken together (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 33, 10 May 2012).

  It is true that the judgment sets out an accurate description of the relevant case-law, with an emphasis on the body of principles developed by the Grand Chamber in the case of Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011).

• EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

  S.N. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  Therefore, the Court accepts that in criminal proceedings concerning sexual abuse certain measures may be taken for the purpose of protecting the victim, provided that such measures can be reconciled with an adequate and effective exercise of the rights of the defence (see, for example, Aigner, cited above, § 35; A.S. v. Finland, no. 40156/07, § 55, 28 September 2010; and S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V).

 
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 315/09

  A.G. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  While it is true that it was for the investigating authorities to decide on the use of investigative measures, it is noteworthy that they did not address the applicant's requests, let alone offer any alternatives less disturbing for the victim, such as allowing the applicant's counsel to take part in the interview, or giving the defence an opportunity to indirectly put questions to E. (see, for example, A.G. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 315/09, 10 January 2012, where the applicant's defence counsel was present in an adjoining room during a police interview of the presumed victim and posed questions to her via the police inspector interviewing her).
• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 28328/03

  AIGNER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  For this reason, the Court considers it appropriate to examine the complaints under the two provisions taken together (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 33, 10 May 2012).
• EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 29900/96

  SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 67, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  While Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national legislation and the domestic courts (see, amongst others, Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 14.03.2019 - C-38/18

  Gambino und Hyka - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in …

  60 CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD005963209.
• EGMR - 10831/17 (anhängig)

  MASIOR c. POLOGNE

  Le requérant a-t-il bénéficié d'un procès équitable au sens de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention ? En particulier, a-t-il eu la possibilité adéquate d'interroger ou faire interroger M., victime des faits reprochés et principal témoin à charge, comme l'exige l'article 6 § 3 d) de la Convention (voir, en particulier, Al Khawaja et Tahery c. Royaume-Uni [GC], nos 26766/05 et 22228/06, § 118, 15 décembre 2011, Schatschaschwili c. Allemagne [GC], no 9154/10, § 100, CEDH 2015 et Vronchenko c. Estonie, no 59632/09, § 56, 18 juillet 2013)?.