Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DANILENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 14+11, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
  Partly struck out of the list Violation of Art. 14+11 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DANILENKOV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE [Extraits]

  Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 14+11, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
  Radiation partielle du rôle Violation de l'art. 14+11 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation (französisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67336/01
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 11002/05

  ASSOCIATED SOCIETY OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND FIREMEN (ASLEF) CONTRE LE …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

  An employee or worker should be free to join or not join a trade union without being sanctioned or subject to disincentives (see Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) v. the United Kingdom, no. 11002/05, § 39, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 12.11.2008 - 34503/97

  Demir und Baykara ./. Türkei - Streikrecht für Beamte

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

  Nevertheless, as to the substance of the right of association enshrined in Article 11, the Court takes into consideration the totality of the measures taken by the State concerned in order to secure trade union freedom, subject to its margin of appreciation (see Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503/97, § 144, 12 November 2008).
• EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 30668/96

  WILSON, NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

  It considers that it is not necessary to rule on this issue, since the responsibility of the Russian Federation would, in any case, be engaged if the matters complained of resulted from a failure on its part to secure to the applicants under domestic law the rights set forth in Article 11 of the Convention (see Wilson, National Union of Journalists and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 30668/96, 30671/96 and 30678/96, § 41, ECHR 2002-V).

 
• EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 2476/02

  THÉVENON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

  The Court reiterates that it has been its practice to strike applications out of the list of cases in the absence of any heir or close relative who has expressed a wish to pursue the application (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, § 31, Series A no. 287; Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 23, ECHR 2003-IX; and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 25.03.1994 - 17116/90

  SCHERER v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

  The Court reiterates that it has been its practice to strike applications out of the list of cases in the absence of any heir or close relative who has expressed a wish to pursue the application (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, § 31, Series A no. 287; Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 23, ECHR 2003-IX; and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 67336/01

  The Court reiterates that it has been its practice to strike applications out of the list of cases in the absence of any heir or close relative who has expressed a wish to pursue the application (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, § 31, Series A no. 287; Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 23, ECHR 2003-IX; and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-...).

• BVerfG, 16.12.2021 - 1 BvR 1541/20

  Der Gesetzgeber muss Vorkehrungen zum Schutz behinderter Menschen für den Fall …

  Grundsätzlich berücksichtigt die Rechtsprechung auch staatliche positive Verpflichtungen, effektiven und klaren Schutz gegen Diskriminierung im Erwerbsleben bereitzustellen (vgl. EGMR, Danilenkov et al. v. Russia, Urteil vom 30. Juli 2009, Nr. 67336/01, § 136).
• EGMR, 22.03.2012 - 30078/06

  Konstantin Markin ./. Russland

  The positive obligation to establish a judicial system which ensures effective protection of a social right has already been determined by the Court (Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, § 136, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 30100/18

  BARALIJA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Lastly, the Court notes that the responsibility of the State would also be engaged if the discrimination complained of resulted from a failure on the State's part to secure to the applicant under domestic law the rights set forth in the Convention (see Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, § 120, ECHR 2009 (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 976/20

  HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA

  The Court has previously acknowledged that a lack of protection for employees from discrimination by the employer on the grounds of their trade union activities could have a chilling effect and discourage other persons from joining that trade union, which could in turn lead to its disappearance (see Wilson, National Union of Journalists and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 30668/96 and 2 others, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, § 135, ECHR 2009 (extracts); and Trade Union of the Police in the Slovak Republic and Others v. Slovakia, no. 11828/08, §§ 60-61, 25 September 2012).
• EGMR, 05.05.2022 - 31163/13

  VLAHOV v. CROATIA

  It would add to this that a form of abuse might also occur in the event of discriminatory treatment, against which the State is required to take the real and effective measures of protection (see, mutatis mutandis, Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, § 124, ECHR 2009 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 4241/03

  TROFIMCHUK v. UKRAINE

  On the whole, the Court considers that the applicant failed to demonstrate that she had been prevented by her former employer from forming or participating in a trade union or otherwise restricted in the exercise of the right to freedom of association (compare with Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44, and Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, ECHR 2009-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 12736/10

  ZAKHAROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Therefore, States are required under Articles 11 and 14 of the Convention to set up a judicial system that ensures real and effective protection against anti-union discrimination (see Danilenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 67336/01, § 124, ECHR 2009 (extracts)).