Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 14+9 Abs. 1, Art. 35 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 14+9-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion Article 9-2 - Necessary in a democratic society) ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-2 - Necessary in a democratic society) ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2015, 277

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 40825/98

  RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  The State therefore has a duty to remain neutral and impartial in exercising its regulatory power in the sphere of religious freedom and in its relations with different religions, denominations and beliefs (see Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 116, ECHR 2001-XII; Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825/98, § 97, 31 July 2008; Savez crkava "Rijec zivota" and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798/08, § 88, 9 December 2010).

  Moreover, the remaining liability to rates is relatively low, in monetary terms, and the impact on the applicant of the impugned measure cannot be compared to the detriment suffered by the applicants in cases such as Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, ECHR 2006-XI, Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825/98, 31 July 2008, Savez crkava "Rijeczivota" and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798/08, 9 December 2010.

• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 50390/99

  McGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  Nevertheless, the remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law (see, for example, McGlinchey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 50390/99, § 62, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 72881/01

  BRANCHE DE MOSCOU DE L'ARMEE DU SALUT c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  Moreover, the remaining liability to rates is relatively low, in monetary terms, and the impact on the applicant of the impugned measure cannot be compared to the detriment suffered by the applicants in cases such as Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, ECHR 2006-XI, Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825/98, 31 July 2008, Savez crkava "Rijeczivota" and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798/08, 9 December 2010.

 
• EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79

  BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  This is because, given their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is "in the public interest" (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 46, Series A no. 98; see also, for example, National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 80, Reports 1997-VII).
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 42949/98

  RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  42949/98 and 53134/99, § 35, 10 May 2007; Eweida and Others, cited above, § 87).
• EGMR, 06.02.1976 - 5589/72

  SCHMIDT ET DAHLSTRÖM c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  The Court has also explained that Article 14 comes into play whenever "the subject-matter of the disadvantage... constitutes one of the modalities of the exercise of a right guaranteed" (see the National Union of Belgian Police v. Belgium judgment of 27 October 1975, Series A no. 19, p. 20, § 45), or the measure complained of is "linked to the exercise of a right guaranteed" (see the Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden judgment of 6 February 1976, Series A no. 21, p. 17, § 39).
• EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 45701/99

  METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  The State therefore has a duty to remain neutral and impartial in exercising its regulatory power in the sphere of religious freedom and in its relations with different religions, denominations and beliefs (see Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 116, ECHR 2001-XII; Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825/98, § 97, 31 July 2008; Savez crkava "Rijec zivota" and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798/08, § 88, 9 December 2010).
• EGMR, 26.09.2013 - 8916/05

  ASSOCIATION LES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH CONTRE LA FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  The Court can well understand such an assessment by the national courts of the facts of the present case, although it may be that in certain circumstances issues concerning the operation of religious buildings, including expenses incurred as a result of the taxation status of such buildings, are capable of having an impact on the exercise of the right of members of religious groups to manifest religious belief (see, mutatis mutandis, Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah v. France, no. 8916/05, §§ 48-54, 30 June 2011).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97

  THLIMMENOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  However, this is not the only facet of the prohibition of discrimination in Article 14. The right not to be discriminated against in the enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under the Convention is also violated when States, without an objective and reasonable justification, fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different (Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV; see also D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007; Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos.
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30985/96

  HASSAN ET TCHAOUCH c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 7552/09

  Finally, in this connection, the Court recalls that, but for very exceptional cases, the right to freedom of religion as guaranteed under the Convention excludes any discretion on the part of the State to determine whether religious beliefs or the means used to express such beliefs are legitimate (Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XI).

• BVerfG, 22.10.2014 - 2 BvR 661/12

  Vertraglich vereinbarte Loyalitätsobliegenheiten in kirchlichen …

  Sie untersagt über die bereits genannten Gewährleistungsinhalte des Autonomierechts hinaus der staatlichen Gewalt auch, kraft eigener Einschätzung darüber zu befinden, ob religiöse Glaubensüberzeugungen oder die Mittel zum Ausdruck solcher Glaubensüberzeugungen legitim sind (vgl. EGMR, Manoussakis v. Griechenland, Urteil vom 26. September 1996, Nr. 18748/91, § 47; EGMR, Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow u.a. v. Russland, Urteil vom 10. Juni 2010, Nr. 302/02, § 141; EGMR, Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints v. Vereinigtes Königreich, Urteil vom 4. März 2014, Nr. 7552/09, § 29).

  cc) Im Rahmen der Interessenabwägung hat das staatliche Gericht allerdings stets die konventionsrechtlich geschützte Neutralitätspflicht in religiösen Angelegenheiten zu wahren (vgl. EGMR, Manoussakis v. Griechenland, Urteil vom 26. September 1996, Nr. 18748/91, § 47; EGMR, Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow u.a. v. Russland, Urteil vom 10. Juni 2010, Nr. 302/02, § 141; EGMR, Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints v. Vereinigtes Königreich, Urteil vom 4. März 2014, Nr. 7552/09, § 29).

• EGMR, 05.03.2024 - 64220/19

  Föderation der Aleviten-Gemeinden in Österreich ./. Österreich

  This is because, given their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is "in the public interest" (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 46, Series A no. 98; see also, for example, National and Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 80, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, 4 March 2014).
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10

  TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  It protects the right of believers to meet peacefully in order to worship in the manner prescribed by their religion and also the right to provide, open and maintain places or buildings devoted to religious worship (see The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, § 30, 4 March 2014, and Cumhuriyetçi Egitim ve Kültür Merkezi Vakfi v. Turkey, no. 32093/10, § 41, 2 December 2014).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 32093/10

  CUMHURIYETÇI EGITIM VE KÜLTÜR MERKEZI VAKFI c. TURQUIE

  Comme la Cour l'a déjà dit, les questions relatives à l'exploitation des bâtiments religieux, y compris les frais engagés en raison du statut fiscal de ces bâtiments sont, dans certaines circonstances, susceptibles d'avoir des répercussions importantes sur l'exercice du droit des membres de groupes religieux à manifester leurs croyances religieuses (voir, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints c. Royaume-Uni, no 7552/09, § 30, 4 mars 2014, et mutatis mutandis, Association les Témoins de Jéhovah c. France, no 8916/05, §§ 48-54, 30 juin 2011).
• EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 61177/09

  KORKUT ET AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL TÜRKIYE c. TÜRKIYE

  En effet, une mesure d'ordre économique, financier ou fiscal prise contre une association peut s'analyser en une violation de l'article 11 de la Convention s'il est démontré que cette mesure a réellement et fortement entravé l'exercice des droits qu'il garantit (voir, mutatis mutandis, Église de Jésus-Christ des saints des derniers jours c. Royaume-Uni, no 7552/09, § 30, 4 mars 2014).