Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DEJNEK v. POLAND

  No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  DEJNEK v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 9635/13

  The question of whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 9635/13

  Even single instances of strip searching have been found to amount to degrading treatment in view of the manner in which the strip search was carried out, the possibility that its aim was to humiliate and debase and where there was no justification for it (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII).

• EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 6780/18

  ROTH v. GERMANY

  The Court has found that strip searches may be necessary on occasion to ensure prison security or to prevent disorder or crime (see Valasinas, cited above, § 117; Iwa?„czuk v. Poland, no. 25196/94, § 59, 15 November 2001; Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, § 60, ECHR 2003-II; Frérot v. France, no. 70204/01, § 38, 12 June 2007; and Dejnek v. Poland, no. 9635/13, § 60, 1 June 2017).
• BVerfG, 23.09.2020 - 2 BvR 1810/19

  Körperliche Durchsuchung eines Strafgefangenen nach einem Besuch (Durchsuchungen …

  Mit Entkleidungen und der Inspektion von Körperöffnungen verbundene Durchsuchungen können danach durch die Erfordernisse der Sicherheit und Ordnung der Haftanstalt gerechtfertigt sein; sie müssen aber in schonender Weise - unter anderem außerhalb möglichen Sichtkontakts anderer Gefangener oder nicht notwendigen, anwesenden Personals - und dürfen nicht anlasslos, routinemäßig und unabhängig von Verdachtsgründen durchgeführt werden (vgl. jüngst EGMR, Pawelkowicz v. Poland, Beschluss vom 6. November 2018, Nr. 59460/12, § 27; Dejnek v. Poland, Urteil vom 1. Juni 2017, Nr. 9635/13, § 60 und § 70; s. auch grundlegend EGMR, Iwanczuk v. Poland, Urteil vom 15. November 2001, Nr. 25196/94, § 59; Van der Ven v. The Netherlands, Urteil vom 4. Februar 2003, Nr. 50901/99, § 60 f.; und Wainwright v. The United Kingdom, Urteil vom 26. September 2006, Nr. 12350/04, § 42 f.).
• EGMR, 17.05.2023 - 13329/21

  MITT v. ESTONIA

  The Court, being the master of characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, considers that it is appropriate to address the applicant's complaint about the strip search in prison under Article 8 of the Convention (see Dejnek v. Poland, no. 9635/13, §§ 70-77, 1 June 2017; Jaeger v. Estonia, no. 1574/13, §§ 42-45, 31 July 2014; compare with Roth v. Germany, nos.

 
• EGMR - 33987/19 (anhängig)

  MADEJSKI v. POLAND and 6 other applications

  Do the relevant facts of the applications relating to the strip searches give rise to a violation of the applicants' right to their private life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, Milka v. Poland, no. 14322/12, §§ 41-50, 15 September 2015; Dejnek v. Poland, no. 9635/13, §§ 70-77, 1 June 2017; and Bojar v. Poland [Committee], no. 11148/18, §§ 8-18, 11 May 2023)?.
• EGMR - 8280/23 (anhängig)

  TATIC v. SLOVAKIA

  Alternatively, have these searches been in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society as required by Article 8 § 2 of the Convention (see Dejnek v. Poland, no. 9635/13, § 70, 1 June 2017, and Wainwright v. the United Kingdom, no. 12350/04, §§ 40 and 42, ECHR 2006-X)?.
• EGMR - 9152/23 (anhängig)

  SKUBAN v. SLOVAKIA

  Alternatively, have these searches been in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society as required by Article 8 § 2 of the Convention (see Dejnek v. Poland, no. 9635/13, § 70, 1 June 2017, and Wainwright v. the United Kingdom, no. 12350/04, §§ 40 and 42, ECHR 2006-X)?.
• EGMR - 15807/19 (anhängig)

  MELLIOU c. GRÈCE

  Compte tenu des circonstances dans lesquelles elle a été effectuée, la fouille corporelle intégrale de la requérante a-t-elle constitué un traitement contraire à l'article 3 de la Convention et/ou porté atteinte à son droit au respect de sa vie privée au sens de l'article 8 de la Convention (voir, mutatis mutandis, Roth c. Allemagne, nos 6780/18 et 30776/18, §§ 64-72, 22 octobre 2020, Dejnek c. Pologne, no 9635/13, §§ 57-77, 1er juin 2017, et Jaeger c. Estonie, no 1574/13, §§ 37-49, 31 juillet 2014) ?.
• EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 24129/11

  O.R. AND L.R. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In examining the manner in which the applicants were treated, namely being forced under threats of violence to undress in front of an officer of the opposite sex and perform sit-ups and being threatened with violence or even death (see paragraph 9 above), the Court sees no reason to disagree with the findings of the domestic courts (see, for instance, Gäfgen, cited above, § 108; Dejnek v. Poland, no. 9635/13, § 60, 1 June 2017, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII).