Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SÜSSMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Non-violation de l'Art. 6-1 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SÜSSMANN v. GERMANY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 08.09.1993 - 20024/92
• EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 20024/92
• EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

Papierfundstellen

• EuGRZ 1996, 514

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12952/87

  RUIZ-MATEOS c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  According to the its well-established case-law on this issue (see the Deumeland v. Germany judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100, p. 26, para. 77; the Bock v. Germany judgment of 29 March 1989, Series A no. 150, p. 18, para. 37; and the Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 262, p. 19, para. 35), the relevant test in determining whether Constitutional Court proceedings may be taken into account in assessing the reasonableness of the length of proceedings is whether the result of the Constitutional Court proceedings is capable of affecting the outcome of the dispute before the ordinary courts.

  To take into account the argument based on an excessive workload in the Federal Constitutional Court would be inconsistent with the Court's decision in similar cases (see the Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 262).

• EGMR, 06.05.1981 - 7759/77

  Buchholz ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  It is not merely a matter of assessing the amount of time that has elapsed during the proceedings (see the Buchholz v. Germany judgment of 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42).
• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  Each State has to organise its legal system so as to ensure that all disputes over civil rights and obligations are dealt with by a judicial decision with a "reasonable time" (see the König v. Germany judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, and the Milasi v. Italy judgment of 25 June 1987, Series A no. 119).

 
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  The dispute as to the amount of the applicant's pension entitlement was of a pecuniary nature and undeniably concerned a civil right within the meaning of Article 6 (art. 6) (see the Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, p. 17, para. 46, and the Massa v. Italy judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, para. 26).
• EGMR, 18.07.1994 - 13580/88

  KARLHEINZ SCHMIDT v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  Moreover, Article 14 (art. 14), being complementary to the other substantive provisions of the Convention and the Protocols, has no independent application (see, for instance, the Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B, p. 32, para. 22) and the Commission declared the applicant's complaint concerning Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) inadmissible (see paragraph 25 above).
• EGMR, 29.03.1989 - 11118/84

  BOCK v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  According to the its well-established case-law on this issue (see the Deumeland v. Germany judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100, p. 26, para. 77; the Bock v. Germany judgment of 29 March 1989, Series A no. 150, p. 18, para. 37; and the Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 262, p. 19, para. 35), the relevant test in determining whether Constitutional Court proceedings may be taken into account in assessing the reasonableness of the length of proceedings is whether the result of the Constitutional Court proceedings is capable of affecting the outcome of the dispute before the ordinary courts.
• EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 9384/81

  Deumeland ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  According to the its well-established case-law on this issue (see the Deumeland v. Germany judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100, p. 26, para. 77; the Bock v. Germany judgment of 29 March 1989, Series A no. 150, p. 18, para. 37; and the Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 262, p. 19, para. 35), the relevant test in determining whether Constitutional Court proceedings may be taken into account in assessing the reasonableness of the length of proceedings is whether the result of the Constitutional Court proceedings is capable of affecting the outcome of the dispute before the ordinary courts.
• EGMR, 10.07.1984 - 8990/80

  GUINCHO c. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  A State may not shelter behind the imperfections of its court system, whether they be of a procedural nature or in any other area, to evade liability for the resulting delays (see the Guincho v. Portugal judgment of 10 July 1984, Series A no. 81).
• EGMR, 19.04.1993 - 13942/88

  KRASKA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  1 of the Convention (art. 6-1), even if they are conducted before a Constitutional Court, where their outcome is decisive for civil rights and obligations (see, inter alia, the Kraska v. Switzerland judgment of 19 April 1993, Series A no. 254-B, p. 48, para. 26).
• EGMR, 24.08.1993 - 14399/88

  MASSA v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 20024/92

  The dispute as to the amount of the applicant's pension entitlement was of a pecuniary nature and undeniably concerned a civil right within the meaning of Article 6 (art. 6) (see the Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, p. 17, para. 46, and the Massa v. Italy judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, para. 26).

• BSG, 13.12.2005 - B 4 RA 220/04 B

  Anforderungen an die Rüge einer überlangen Verfahrensdauer

  Denn insoweit obliegt es den Vertragsstaaten, ihr Gerichtswesen so zu organisieren, dass ihre Gerichte angemessene Fristen einhalten können (EGMR, Urteil vom 16. September 1996, Az 57/1995/563/649, EuGRZ 1996, 514).
• LSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, 22.05.2007 - L 2 B 31/07

  Erhebung der Untätigkeitsbeschwerde nach einer dreijährigen Verfahrensdauer im …

  Dementsprechend ist im vorliegenden Zusammenhang nicht weiter darauf einzugehen, dass es den Vertragsstaaten der EMRK obliegt, ihr Gerichtswesen so zu organisieren, dass ihre Gerichte angemessene Fristen einhalten können (EGMR, Urteil vom 16. September 1996, Az: 57/1995/563/649, EuGRZ 1996, 514).
• EGMR, 16.09.1996 - 21893/93

  AKDIVAR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  [1] L'affaire porte le n° 57/1995/563/649.