Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 6 Abs. 1, Abs. 2, Abs. 3 lit. a EMRK; Art. 10 EMRK; Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG; Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG; Art. 5 Abs. 1 GG
  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (Anwendbarkeit: Begriff der strafrechtlichen Anklage bei gerichtlichen Ordnungsstrafen, Ordnungsmitteln und contempt of court): Unabhängigkeit und Unparteilichkeit des Gerichts (Befangenheit und Besorgnis der Befangenheit: objektiver und ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 10, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 6-2 Violation of Art. 6-3-a Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KYPRIANOU c. CHYPRE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 10, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 6-1 Violation de l'art. 6-2 Violation de l'art. 6-3-a Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 10 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 73797/01
• EGMR, 08.04.2003 - 73797/01
• EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01
• EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 73797/01
• EGMR, 01.04.2015 - 73797/01

Papierfundstellen

• HRRS 2004 Nr. 237

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01

  Secondly, the tribunal must also be impartial from an objective viewpoint, that is, it must offer sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubts (see Sander v. the United Kingdom , no. 34129/96, § 22, ECHR 2000-V, and Piersack v. Belgium , judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, § 30).
• EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

  Öztürk ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01

  Applying the criteria established by the case-law of the Court ( Engel and others v. the Netherlands , judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, §§ 82-83; Öztürk v. Germany , judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, §§ 48-50), namely a) the domestic classification of the offence, b) the nature of the offence, and c) the degree of severity of the penalty that the person concerned risks incurring, it is clear that the offence in question was criminal.
• EGMR, 23.03.1994 - 14220/88

  RAVNSBORG v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01

  The situation regarding sanctions of a disciplinary nature, in the form of fines, in connection with behaviour which cannot be considered as amounting to a criminal charge, is different ( Ravnsborg v. Sweden , judgment of 23 March 1994, Series A no. 283-B).

 
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01

  According to the Court's case-law, it is possible for a higher tribunal, in certain circumstances, to make reparation for an initial violation of the Convention (see the De Cubber v. Belgium judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 19, § 33).
• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01

  As regards the applicant's contention concerning the subjective bias of the judges of the Assize Court, the Court notes that the principle that a tribunal shall be presumed to be free of personal prejudice or partiality is long established in the case-law of the Court (see, for example, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium , judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 25, § 58).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01

  The Court recalls that the fairness of proceedings must be assessed with regard to the case as a whole (see, for example, Miailhe v. France (no. 2) , judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1338, § 43, and Imbrioscia v. Switzerland , judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, pp.
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 73797/01

  That information should be detailed (see Pélissier and Sassi v. France (GC), no. 25444/94, § 51, ECHR 1999-II).