Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 1 EMRK; Art. 8 EMRK; Art. 13 EMRK; Art. 5 EMRK; Art. 103 UN-Charta; Resolution 1267 (1999); Resolution 1333 (2000); Resolution 1373 (2001); Resolution 1390 (2002)
  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Recht auf Beschwerde; Verhältnis zwischen der EMRK und UN-Recht (Antiterrorresolutionen des UN-Sicherheitsrats; sog. UN-Terrorliste; smart sanctions; Sanktionsausschuss des Sicherheitsrats [1267-Committee]); extraterritoriale ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NADA v. SWITZERLAND

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 13+8, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae) Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Victim) Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae) Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NADA c. SUISSE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 13+8, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Exceptions préliminaires rejetées (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae) Exceptions préliminaires rejetées (Article 34 - Victime) Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae) Exception préliminaire rejetée (Article 35-1 - Epuisement ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NADA v. SWITZERLAND - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 13+8, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  [DEU] Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae) Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Victim) Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae) Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Besprechungen u.ä. (4)

• HRR Strafrecht (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Der Fall Nada vor dem EGMR: Nichts Neues zur Normhierarchie zwischen UN-Recht und EMRK?

• verfassungsblog.de (Entscheidungsanmerkung)

  EMRK kann zum Völkerrechtsbruch zwingen

• lto.de (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Unschuldiger Terrorverdächtigter gewinnt in Straßburg: EGMR verurteilt Schweiz wegen Menschenrechtsverletzung

• skmr.ch (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Die schweizerische Umsetzung von Antiterrorismusresolutionen des UN-Sicherheitsrats verletzt die EMRK

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  Nada v. Switzerland

  [23.03.2011]

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08
• EGMR, 17.12.2014 - 10593/08

Papierfundstellen

• HRRS 2013 Nr. 224

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (26)

• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 25702/94

  Umfang einer an die Großen Kammer verwiesenen "Rechtssache" im Sinne des Art. 43 …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  The relevant criterion in such matters is the existence of effective ties between the individuals concerned (ibid.; see also K. and T. v. Finland (GC), no. 25702/94, § 150, ECHR 2001-VII, and Serife Yigit v. Turkey (GC), no. 3976/05, § 93, 2 November 2010).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  It reiterates that "private life" is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see, for example, Glor v. Switzerland, no. 13444/04, § 52, ECHR 2009; Tysiac v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 107, ECHR 2007-I; Hadri-Vionnet v. Switzerland, no. 55525/00, § 51, 14 February 2008; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom (GC), nos.
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  Submissions of the parties and third-party interveners (a) The Government 216. The Government, referring to the Guzzardi v. Italy (6 November 1980, Series A no. 39) and S.F. v. Switzerland (no. 16360/90, Commission decision of 2 March 1994, Decisions and Reports 76-B, pp. 13 et seq.) cases, argued that there had been no "deprivation of liberty" in the present case.

 
• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  The object and purpose of the Convention, being a human rights treaty protecting individuals on an objective basis (see Neulinger and Shuruk, cited above, § 145), call for its provisions to be interpreted and applied in a manner that renders its guarantees practical and effective (see, among other authorities, Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37).
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  Under that provision the State must in particular act in a manner calculated to allow those concerned to lead a normal family life (see Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 31, Series A no. 31).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  Account should be taken, as indicated in Article 31 § 3 (c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, of "any relevant rules of international law applicable in the relations between the parties", and in particular the rules concerning the international protection of human rights (see, for example, Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland (GC), no. 41615/07, § 131, ECHR 2010; Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom (GC), no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI; and Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 29, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  The Court has found that health, together with physical and moral integrity, falls within the realm of private life (see Glor, cited above, § 54, and X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; see also Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  In other words, the Convention does not as such guarantee the right of an alien to enter a particular country (see, among many other authorities, Maslov v. Austria (GC), no. 1638/03, § 68, ECHR 2008; Üner v. the Netherlands (GC), no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII; Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, § 42, Reports 1997-VI; and Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  However, Article 13 requires that a remedy be available in domestic law only in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, for example, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 54, Series A no. 131).
• EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9063/80

  GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  The Court would further reiterate that Article 8 also protects the right to respect for one's home (see, for example, Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, § 46, Series A no. 109).
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE
• EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 39692/09

  AUSTIN ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 61603/00

  Konventionskonforme Auslegung des deutschen (Zivil-)Rechts …
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03

  TYSIAC c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
• EGMR, 12.12.2001 - 52207/99

  V. und B. B., Ž. S., M. S., D. J. und D. S. gegen Belgien, Dänemark, …
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring
• EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 48205/99

  GENTILHOMME, SCHAFF-BENHADJI ET ZEROUKI c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94

  Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …
• EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 39288/98

  EKIN ASSOCIATION v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 45036/98

  Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi ./. Irland
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger
• EuGH, 03.09.2008 - C-402/05

  und Sicherheitspolitik - DER GERICHTSHOF ERKLÄRT DIE VERORDNUNG, MIT DER DIE …

• EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 38450/05

  SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Ainsi, aux fins du « respect'de la vie privée et familiale au sens de l'article 8, il faut prendre en compte les particularités de chaque cas pour éviter une application mécanique des dispositions du droit interne à une situation particulière (voir, parmi les arrêts récents, Nada c. Suisse [GC], no 10593/08, §§ 181-185, CEDH 2012).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 11.04.2018 - C-600/16

  National Iranian Tanker Company / Rat - Rechtsmittel - Gemeinsame Außen- und …

  134 Urteil des EGMR vom 27. Juni 2000, 11han/Türkei (CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002227793, § 97); vgl. z. B. auch Urteil vom 12. September 2012, Nada/Schweiz (CE:ECHR:2012:0912JUD001059308, § 207 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 21885/07

  KUSHTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Thus, in order to ensure "respect" for private and family life within the meaning of Article 8, the realities of each case must be taken into account in order to avoid the mechanical application of domestic law to a particular situation (see, as a recent authority, Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, §§ 181-186, 12 September 2012).

 
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 22089/07

  ARKHESTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Thus, in order to ensure "respect" for private and family life within the meaning of Article 8, the realities of each case must be taken into account in order to avoid the mechanical application of domestic law to a particular situation (see, as a recent authority, Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, §§ 181-186, 12 September 2012).
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 7988/09

  ZALOV AND KHAKULOVA v. RUSSIA

  Thus, in order to ensure "respect" for private and family life within the meaning of Article 8, the realities of each case must be taken into account in order to avoid the mechanical application of domestic law to a particular situation (see, as a recent authority, Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, §§ 181-186, 12 September 2012).
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 38552/05

  ABDULAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Thus, in order to ensure "respect" for private and family life within the meaning of Article 8, the realities of each case must be taken into account in order to avoid the mechanical application of domestic law to a particular situation (see, as a recent authority, Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, §§ 181-186, 12 September 2012).