Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,19994
EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,19994)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.04.2007 - 18147/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,19994)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. April 2007 - 18147/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,19994)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,19994) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW v. RUSSIA

    Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 41, Art. 11+9 MRK
    Preliminary objection dismissed (victim) Violation of Art. 11+9 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention and domestic proceedings ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

  • menschenrechtsbuero.de PDF (Pressemitteilung)

    Scientology Kirche Moskau ./. Russische Föderation

  • religo.ch (Kurzinformation)

    Scientology Kirche erzielt Durchbruch in Russland vor dem Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 2008, 495
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (22)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

    CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02
    Where a substantive Article of the Convention or its Protocols has been invoked both on its own and together with Article 14 and a separate breach has been found of the substantive Article, it is not generally necessary for the Court to consider the case under Article 14 also, though the position is otherwise if a clear inequality of treatment in the enjoyment of the right in question is a fundamental aspect of the case (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 89, ECHR 1999-III, and.
  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02
    Artico v. Italy , judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, § 33).
  • EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

    DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02
    Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom , judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, § 67).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

    STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02
    Sidiropoulos , cited above, § 40; and Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria , nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 84, ECHR 2001-IX).
  • EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 45701/99

    METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02
    The pluralism indissociable from a democratic society, which has been dearly won over the centuries, depends on it (see Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova , no. 45701/99, § 114, ECHR 2001-XII).
  • EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

    SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02
    According to the Court's settled case-law, the expression "prescribed by law" requires that the impugned measure should have a basis in domestic law and also that the law be formulated with sufficient precision to enable the citizen to foresee the consequences which a given action may entail and to regulate his or her conduct accordingly (see, as a classic authority, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) , judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, § 49).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95
    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 18147/02
    Sidiropoulos , cited above, § 40; and Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria , nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 84, ECHR 2001-IX).
  • BAG, 20.11.2012 - 1 AZR 179/11

    Arbeitskampf in kirchlichen Einrichtungen - Dritter Weg

    Das unabhängige Bestehen von Religionsgemeinschaften ist unabdingbare Voraussetzung für den Pluralismus in einer demokratischen Gesellschaft und damit Kernstück des durch Art. 9 EMRK gewährten Schutzes (EGMR [I. Sektion] 5. April 2007 - 18147/02 - [Scientology Kirche Moskau/Russland] Rn. 71 f., NJW 2008, 495) .
  • BVerwG, 09.12.2010 - 10 C 19.09

    Asyl; Flüchtlingsanerkennung; Verfolgungshandlung; Verfolgungsgrund; Religion;

    Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (EGMR) hat in seiner Rechtsprechung wiederholt die grundlegende Bedeutung der Religionsfreiheit für die demokratische Gesellschaft betont (vgl. etwa Urteil vom 5. April 2007 - Nr. 18147/02, Scientology/Russland - Rn. 71, NJW 2008, 495 f.).
  • BAG, 20.11.2012 - 1 AZR 611/11

    Arbeitskampf in kirchlichen Einrichtungen - Zweiter Weg

    Das unabhängige Bestehen von Religionsgemeinschaften ist unabdingbare Voraussetzung für den Pluralismus in einer demokratischen Gesellschaft und damit Kernstück des durch Art. 9 EMRK gewährten Schutzes (EGMR [I. Sektion] 5. April 2007 - 18147/02 - [Scientology Kirche Moskau/Russland] Rn. 71 f., NJW 2008, 495) .
  • OVG Nordrhein-Westfalen, 12.02.2008 - 5 A 130/05

    Scientology-Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts seit dem 28.04.2008 rechtskräftig

    Auch der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte habe mit Urteil vom 5. April 2007 (Scientology Kirche Moskau ./. Russland, Az. 18147/02) festgestellt, dass Scientology eine Religion und die Scientology Kirche eine Religionsgemeinschaft sei.
  • BVerwG, 05.03.2009 - 10 C 51.07

    Asyl; Flüchtlingsanerkennung; Qualifikationsrichtlinie; Verfolgungshandlung;

    Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte hat in seiner Rechtsprechung wiederholt die grundlegende Bedeutung der Religionsfreiheit für die demokratische Gesellschaft betont (vgl. etwa Urteil vom 5. April 2007 - 18147/02 - Scientology/Russland, NJW 2008, 495 f.).
  • EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 302/02

    JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court found in both cases that "the Moscow authorities did not act in good faith and neglected their duty of neutrality and impartiality" (see Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147/02, § 97, 5 April 2007, and Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, § 97, ECHR 2006-XI).

    The Court has already found in a similar case concerning a denial of re-registration under the Russian Religions Act that, as long as the applicant community has retained legal capacity to lodge an application with this Court, individual applicants could not themselves claim to be victims of a violation resulting from the domestic authorities' refusal of re-registration, which affected only the applicant community as such (see Church of Scientology Moscow and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 18147/02, 28 October 2004, and also The Holy Monasteries v. Greece, nos.

  • EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 70945/11

    Ungarns Kirchengesetz verletzt die Menschenrechte

    The Court has found in two previous cases (see Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army, cited above, § 67; and Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147/02, § 78, 5 April 2007) that the refusal of re-registration disclosed an interference with a religious organisation's right to freedom of association and also with its right to freedom of religion.

    The majority then refers, in paragraph 82, to two previous cases of the Court (Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, § 67, ECHR 2006-XI, and Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147/02, § 78, 5 April 2007) where the "refusal of registration" disclosed interference with a religious organisation's right to freedom of association and also with its right to freedom of religion.

  • VGH Baden-Württemberg, 16.01.2008 - 5 S 393/06

    Sondernutzungsgebühr für Veranstaltung der Church of Scientology

    In diesem Zusammenhang nicht aussagekräftig ist auch das Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte vom 05.04.2007 (Az.: 18147/02), auf das sich die Klägerin in ihrem Schriftsatz vom 15.10.2007 bezieht.
  • EGMR, 12.04.2018 - 48044/10

    BEKTASHI COMMUNITY AND OTHERS v.

    In the absence of any indication that the applicant association had no capacity to lodge the application with this Court, it considers that the individual applicants could not themselves claim to be victims of a violation resulting from the domestic authorities" refusal of re-registration, which affected only the applicant association as such (see Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow v. Russia, no. 302/02, § 168, 10 June 2010 and Church of Scientology Moscow and others v. Russia (dec.), no. 18147/02, 28 October 2004).

    It considers that in the present circumstances, in which the re-registration of the applicant association on the basis of section 35 of the 2007 Act was refused by the registration court, with the result that it lost its legal status as a fully-fledged religious community and became unable to continue exercising the rights of a religious organisation, there has been an interference with the applicant association's right to freedom of association taken in conjunction with its freedom of religion (see Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, § 71, ECHR 2006-XI, and Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147/02, § 84, 5 April 2007).

  • EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 72874/01

    UNION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

    The Court has already found in similar cases that as long as the applicant organisations had retained the legal capacity to lodge an application with this Court, individual applicants could not themselves claim to be victims of a violation resulting from the domestic authorities" actions, which concerned the applicant organisations as such (see Church of Scientology Moscow and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 18147/02, 28 October 2004; Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow v. Russia, no. 302/02, § 168, 10 June 2010; see also The Holy Monasteries v. Greece, nos.

    According to the Court's well-established case-law, complaints concerning registration of religious organisations merit consideration under Articles 9 and 11 of the Convention (see Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, §§ 74-75, ECHR 2006-XI; Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147/02, § 64, 5 April 2007; Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow v. Russia, no. 302/02, § 161, 10 June 2010; Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos.

  • EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10

    TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 37508/12

    CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 26587/07

    KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • VG Düsseldorf, 24.09.2010 - 21 K 4217/09

    Yeziden Syrien (mittelbare) Gruppenverfolgung Gruppenverfolgung

  • EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 13918/06

    SAVENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 56862/15

    TONCHEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  • EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 41817/10

    CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES IN THE NKR v. ARMENIA

  • EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 3532/07

    ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  • EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 58088/08

    METODIEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 34960/04

    THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

  • EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 76836/01

    KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

    CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF ST PETERSBURG AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht