Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,6299
EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,6299)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.06.2010 - 30141/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,6299)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Juni 2010 - 30141/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,6299)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,6299) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (5)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SCHALK ET KOPF c. AUTRICHE

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 12, Art. 14, Art. 14+8, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
    Exception préliminaire rejetée (radiation du rôle) Partiellement irrecevable Non-violation de l'art. 12 Non-violation de l'art. 14+8 (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 12, Art. 14, Art. 14+8, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
    Preliminary objection dismissed (struck out of the list) Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 12 No violation of Art. 14+8 (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (struck out of the list);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Art. 12;No violation of Art. 14+8

  • icj.org PDF

    Horst Schalk & Johann Kopf ./. Österreich (englisch)

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Sonstiges (2)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 2011, 1421
  • FamRZ 2010, 1525
  • DÖV 2010, 737
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (47)Neu Zitiert selbst (21)

  • EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

    COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    Cossey judgment of 27 September 1990 (no. 10843/84, concerning the particular position of transsexual persons) that the restriction of marriage to this "traditional" concept was objectively justified, observing "... that attachment to the traditional concept of marriage provides sufficient reason for the continued adoption of biological criteria for determining a person's sex for the purposes of marriage.' [The subsequent change in the caselaw concerning the particular issue of transsexuals (ECHR, Goodwin, no. 28957/95, 11 July 2002) does not permit the conclusion that there should be any change in the assessment of the general question at issue here.] The fact that samesex relationships fall within the concept of private life and as such enjoy the protection of Article 8 of the ECHR ­ which also prohibits discrimination on nonobjective grounds (Article 14 of the ECHR) ­ does not give rise to an obligation to change the law of marriage.

    Consequently, this was considered a matter encompassed within the power of the Contracting States to regulate by national law the exercise of the right to marry (see Sheffield and Horsham, cited above, § 67; Cossey v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1990, § 46, Series A no. 184; see also Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, §§ 49-50, Series A no. 106).

  • EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

    Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    Cossey judgment of 27 September 1990 (no. 10843/84, concerning the particular position of transsexual persons) that the restriction of marriage to this "traditional" concept was objectively justified, observing "... that attachment to the traditional concept of marriage provides sufficient reason for the continued adoption of biological criteria for determining a person's sex for the purposes of marriage.' [The subsequent change in the caselaw concerning the particular issue of transsexuals (ECHR, Goodwin, no. 28957/95, 11 July 2002) does not permit the conclusion that there should be any change in the assessment of the general question at issue here.] The fact that samesex relationships fall within the concept of private life and as such enjoy the protection of Article 8 of the ECHR ­ which also prohibits discrimination on nonobjective grounds (Article 14 of the ECHR) ­ does not give rise to an obligation to change the law of marriage.

    Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC] (no. 28957/95, ECHR 2002-VI), for instance, the Court had reviewed its position regarding the possibility of postoperative transsexuals to marry a person of the sex opposite to their acquired gender, having regard to the fact that a majority of Contracting States permitted such marriages.

  • EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82

    JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    A child born out of such a relationship is ipso jure part of that "family" unit from the moment and by the very fact of his birth (see Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000-VIII; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 44, Series A no. 290; and also Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 56, Series A no. 112).
  • EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02

    E.B. v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    57. In any case, the applicants did not rely mainly on the textual interpretation of Article 12. In essence they relied on the Court's caselaw according to which the Convention is a living instrument which is to be interpreted in presentday conditions (see E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 92, ECHR 2008-..., and Christine Goodwin, cited above, §§ 74-75).
  • EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 33290/96

    SALGUEIRO DA SILVA MOUTA c. PORTUGAL

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    Others were examined under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8. These included, inter alia, different age of consent under criminal law for homosexual relations (L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I), the attribution of parental rights (Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX), permission to adopt a child (Fretté v. France, no. 36515/97, ECHR 2002-I, and E.B. v. France, cited above) and the right to succeed to the deceased partner's tenancy (Karner, cited above).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 35748/05

    R. AND F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    53. Two further cases are of interest in the present context: (Parry v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42971/05, ECHR 2006-XV, and R. and F. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 35748/05, 28 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 36515/97

    FRETTE v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    Others were examined under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8. These included, inter alia, different age of consent under criminal law for homosexual relations (L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I), the attribution of parental rights (Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX), permission to adopt a child (Fretté v. France, no. 36515/97, ECHR 2002-I, and E.B. v. France, cited above) and the right to succeed to the deceased partner's tenancy (Karner, cited above).
  • EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 39392/98

    L. AND V. v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    Others were examined under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8. These included, inter alia, different age of consent under criminal law for homosexual relations (L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I), the attribution of parental rights (Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX), permission to adopt a child (Fretté v. France, no. 36515/97, ECHR 2002-I, and E.B. v. France, cited above) and the right to succeed to the deceased partner's tenancy (Karner, cited above).
  • EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

    KEEGAN v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    A child born out of such a relationship is ipso jure part of that "family" unit from the moment and by the very fact of his birth (see Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000-VIII; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 44, Series A no. 290; and also Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 56, Series A no. 112).
  • EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 56501/00

    MATA ESTEVEZ v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04
    Spain (dec.), no. 56501/00, ECHR 2001-VI, with further references).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 42971/05

    PARRY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

    Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  • EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83

    NORRIS c. IRLANDE

  • EGMR, 18.12.1987 - 11329/85

    F. v. SWITZERLAND

  • EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81

    REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 36536/02

    B. AND L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 4479/06

    COURTEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

    DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

    KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  • EGMR, 22.04.1993 - 15070/89

    MODINOS c. CHYPRE

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97

    THLIMMENOS c. GRECE

  • BVerfG, 19.02.2013 - 1 BvL 1/11

    Sukzessivadoption

    In der Rechtssache Schalk und Kopf gegen Österreich (EGMR, Urteil vom 24. Juni 2010 - 30141/04 -, NJW 2011, S. 1421 ff.) ist der Gerichtshof unter Hinweis auf die gesellschaftliche und rechtliche Entwicklung in den Konventionsstaaten ausdrücklich von seiner früheren Auffassung abgerückt, dass gleichgeschlechtliche Paare kein Recht auf Achtung des Familienlebens im Sinne von Art. 8 EMRK haben könnten.
  • EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 48420/10

    Eweida u.a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich - Religionsfreiheit am Arbeitsplatz

    La Cour rappelle avoir jugé dans sa jurisprudence relative à l'article 14 que seules des considérations très fortes peuvent l'amener à estimer compatible avec la Convention une différence de traitement fondée exclusivement sur l'orientation sexuelle (voir, par exemple, Karner c. Autriche, no 40016/98, § 37, CEDH 2003-IX, Smith et Grady, précité, § 90, et Schalk et Kopf c. Autriche, no 30141/04, § 97, CEDH 2010).
  • EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 60367/08

    Khamtokhu und Aksenchik ./. Russland: Lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe nur für Männer

    Moreover, the area in question should still be regarded as one of evolving rights, with no established consensus, in which States must also enjoy a margin of appreciation in the timing of the introduction of legislative changes (compare Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, § 105, ECHR 2010).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 28475/12

    RATZENBÖCK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIA

    The Upper Austrian Regional Governor (Oberösterreichischer Landeshauptmann) dismissed the appeal on 18 August 2010, arguing with reference to Schalk and Kopf v. Austria (no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010) that as the Contracting States were allowed to restrict access to marriage to differentsex couples, it would appear unreasonable not to allow them to reserve access to registered partnerships exclusively for samesex couples.

    In 2010 already the Court concluded that the right to marry under Article 12 of the Convention was not in all circumstances limited to marriage between two persons of the opposite sex, but that the recognition of samesex marriages should be left to regulation by domestic law (see Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, § 61, ECHR 2010).

    They are social groups which exist irrespective of regulatory choices and, more importantly, social groups with regard to which the Court has recognised that they "are in principle in a relatively similar or comparable situation as regards their general need for legal recognition and protection of their relationship" (see paragraph 34 of the judgment; see also Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, § 99, 18 RATZENBÖCK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIA JUDGMENT ­ SEPARATE OPINIONS.

  • EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 29381/09

    Homosexualität in Griechenland

    Les requérants se réfèrent à l'arrêt Schalk et Kopf c. Autriche (no 30141/04, CEDH 2010) dans lequel la Cour a reconnu qu'un couple de même sexe cohabitant de facto de manière stable relève de la notion de « vie familiale ".
  • VGH Bayern, 21.03.2024 - 24 B 23.30860

    Asylrecht, Sekundärmigration (Italien), anerkannt Schutzberechtigte,

    aa) Familiäre Bindungen im Sinne dieser Vorschrift können - wie bei Art. 7 GRCh und Art. 8 EMRK - auch Beziehungen unter Erwachsenen ohne Kinder sein (vgl. EGMR, U.v. 24.6.2010 - Schalk u. Kopf/Österreich - Nr. 30141/04 - NJW 2011, 1421/1425 Rn. 94; EGMR, U.v. 3.4.2012 - van der Heijden/Niederlande - Nr. 42857/05 - NJW 2014, 39/40 Rn. 50).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 40183/07

    Kein Recht auf die Ehe für alle

    Le 31 août 2010, 1a chambre a décidé d'ajourner sa décision sur la tenue d'une audience dans l'attente de l'arrêt dans l'affaire Schalk et Kopf c. Autriche (no 30141/04, CEDH 2010).

    La Cour rappelle que, dans l'arrêt Schalk et Kopf c. Autriche (no 30141/04, § 61, CEDH 2010) elle a admis, en se référant notamment à l'article 9 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne, que l'article 12 s'appliquait au grief des requérants (voir également Hämäläinen c. Finlande [GC], no 37359/09, § 110, CEDH 2014 et Oliari et autres précité, § 191).

  • EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 18766/11

    Italien muß Rechtsrahmen für gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaft schaffen

    directly concerned by the situation and have a legitimate personal interest in seeing it brought to an end (see, mutatis mutandis, Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 49, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and by implication, Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010).
  • EGMR, 16.07.2014 - 37359/09

    HÄMÄLÄINEN c. FINLANDE

    La Cour réitère sa jurisprudence selon laquelle l'article 8 de la Convention ne peut être compris comme imposant aux États contractants l'obligation d'ouvrir le mariage aux couples homosexuels (Schalk et Kopf c. Autriche, no 30141/04, § 101, CEDH 2010).

    Quant à la poursuite d'un but légitime, dans le contexte de sa jurisprudence concernant l'article 14 combiné avec l'article 8 de la Convention, la Cour a admis que les États avaient un intérêt légitime à protéger le mariage au sens traditionnel du terme en réservant légalement cette institution aux partenaires hétérosexuels, et que cet intérêt pouvait justifier une différence de traitement (Karner c. Autriche, no 40016/98, § 40, CEDH 2003-IX, Parry c. Royaume-Uni (déc.) no 42971/05, CEDH 2010, Schalk et Kopf c. Autriche, no 30141/04, §§ 61-62, CEDH 2010, et Vallianatos et autres, précité, §§ 83-85).

  • EGMR, 20.06.2017 - 67667/09

    "Homosexuellen-Propaganda"-Gesetz in Russland: Diskriminierend - und

    The Court sees no reason to consider these elements as incompatible, especially in view of the growing general tendency to include relationships between samesex couples within the concept of "family life" (see P.B. and J.S. v. Austria, no. 18984/02, §§ 27-30, 22 July 2010, and Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, §§ 91-94, ECHR 2010) and the acknowledgement of the need for their legal recognition and protection (see Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, § 165, 21 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 76888/17

    Drittes Geschlecht in Frankreich: "Intersexuell" muss nicht in die Geburtsurkunde

  • EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 51362/09

    TADDEUCCI ET McCALL c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 25951/07

    Keine Diskriminierung, wenn einer Frau ein Adoptionsrecht in Bezug auf das Kind

  • EGMR, 14.12.2017 - 26431/12

    ORLANDI AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  • VG Dresden, 27.04.2018 - 11 K 3142/17
  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 11.01.2018 - C-673/16

    Nach Auffassung von Generalanwalt Wathelet umfasst der Begriff "Ehegatte" im

  • EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 40792/10

    FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • BVerfG, 02.07.2010 - 1 BvR 666/10

    Verweigerung der Eintragung einer der Partnerinnen einer eingetragenen

  • EGMR, 07.05.2013 - 8017/11

    BOECKEL AND GESSNER-BOECKEL v. GERMANY

  • EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 40792/10

    Russland will sich EGMR-Urteil widersetzen: Keine Kompromisse bei

  • EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

    PRZYBYSZEWSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 40209/20

    KOILOVA ET BABULKOVA c. BULGARIE

  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 10.04.2018 - C-89/17

    Generalanwalt Bobek: Kehrt ein Unionsbürger in seinen Herkunftsmitgliedstaat

  • EGMR, 23.01.2023 - 61435/19

    Verstoß gegen Meinungsfreiheit: Geschichten über gleichgeschlechtliche

  • EGMR, 10.03.2011 - 2700/10

    KIYUTIN c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 68453/13

    PAJIC v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 75135/14

    MAYMULAKHIN AND MARKIV v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 24.03.2022 - 29775/18

    C.E. u.a. ./. Frankreich - Rechtliche Beziehung zwischen einem Kind und dem

  • EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 40020/03

    M. AND OTHERS v. ITALY AND BULGARIA

  • OLG Köln, 05.07.2010 - 16 Wx 64/10

    Eintragung einer im Ausland geschlossenen gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in das

  • EGMR, 25.10.2018 - 37646/13

    DELECOLLE c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 31039/11

    NOVRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 37359/09

    H. c. FINLANDE

  • EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 35214/09

    ALDEGUER TOMÁS v. SPAIN

  • EGMR, 23.03.2017 - 53251/13

    A.-M.V. v. FINLAND

  • EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 21424/16

    GAUVIN-FOURNIS ET SILLIAU c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 04.10.2012 - 57412/08

    CHABAUTY c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 03.04.2014 - 58809/09

    KONSTANTINIDIS c. GRÈCE

  • EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 44870/19

    AGARWAL v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  • EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 59963/21

    ZANOLA v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 21698/08

    SOROCINSKIS v. LATVIA

  • EGMR - 13817/14 (anhängig)

    V.V. v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 31.10.2017 - 40597/12

    D AND B v. AUSTRIA

  • EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 41903/10

    A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS

  • EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 41858/10

    K.F. v. CYPRUS

  • EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 39417/07

    ALIM v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 6190/11

    BONNAUD ET LECOQ c. FRANCE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht