Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
POWELL AND RAYNER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 13, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
No violation of Art. 13 (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 13, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Non-violation de l'Art. 13 (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 14.10.1985 - 9310/81
- EKMR, 16.07.1986 - 9310/81
- EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
Papierfundstellen
- Serie A Nr. 172
Wird zitiert von ... (390) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
The Court is "precluded from reviewing on their merits... the complaints rejected as manifestly ill-founded, but empowered to entertain those complaints which the Commission has declared admissible" (see the Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 24, § 54).Article 13 (art. 13) has been consistently interpreted by the Court as requiring a remedy in domestic law only in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, for example, the Boyle and Rice judgment previously cited, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52).
- EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
To this extent there is no "civil right" recognised under domestic law to attract the application of Article 6 § 1 (art. 6-1) (see the Lithgow and Others judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 70, § 192). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82
KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
The compass of the case before the Court is delimited by the Commission's decision on admissibility (see, as the most recent authority, the Kamasinski judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, p. 30, § 59).
- EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82
Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
In that connection, as the case of Boyle and Rice and the case of Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" show, a claim is not necessarily rendered arguable because, before rejecting it as inadmissible, the Commission has devoted careful consideration to it and to its underlying facts (loc. cit., pp. 27-29, §§ 68-76, and pp. 30-31, §§ 79-83; and the Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, pp. 11-13, §§ 28-39). - EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81
LEANDER c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in determining the steps to be taken to ensure compliance with the Convention (see, for example, the Rees judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, p. 15, § 37, as concerns paragraph 1 (art. 8-1), and the Leander judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, p. 25, § 59, as concerns paragraph 2) (art. 8-2). - EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81
REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in determining the steps to be taken to ensure compliance with the Convention (see, for example, the Rees judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, p. 15, § 37, as concerns paragraph 1 (art. 8-1), and the Leander judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, p. 25, § 59, as concerns paragraph 2) (art. 8-2). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
They contended that the statutory bar created by section 76(1) infringed the principles enunciated by the Court in the Ashingdane case (see the judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, pp. 24-25, § 57), in that it did not pursue a legitimate aim, it placed a disproportionate burden on the applicants and, as a result, it destroyed the very essence of their above-mentioned common-law right.
- EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 53600/20
Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz u.a. ./. Schweiz - Staatliche Maßnahmen gegen …
After all, the necessary (and detailed) engagement with scientific evidence in the context of what the Court in Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 44, Series A no. 172 described (in the context of the arguably simpler issue of aircraft noise) as "this difficult social and technical sphere" is not currently part of the Court's working practices. - BVerfG, 20.02.2008 - 1 BvR 2722/06
Verfassungsbeschwerden gegen Planfeststellungsbeschluss für Flughafenbau …
Bei der Prüfung, ob der Vertragsstaat diesen Spielraum verletzt hat, sind auch die bereits getroffenen Lärmbekämpfungsmaßnahmen sowie die dem Betroffenen zustehenden verfahrensrechtlichen Sicherungen zu berücksichtigen (vgl. EuGHMR, Urteil vom 21. Februar 1990, Nr. 9310/81 - "Powell and Rayner v. UK" -, Rn. 40 ff.; Grand Chamber…, Urteil vom 8. Juli 2003, Nr. 36022/97 - "Hatton and others v. UK" -, Rn. 96 ff. und 116 ff.). - EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 36022/97
HATTON ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
La Convention ne reconnaît pas expressément le droit à un environnement sain et calme, mais lorsqu'une personne pâtit directement et gravement du bruit ou d'autres formes de pollution, une question peut se poser sous l'angle de l'article 8. Ainsi, dans l'affaire Powell et Rayner c. Royaume-Uni (arrêt du 21 février 1990, série A no 172, p. 18, § 40), dans laquelle les requérants se plaignaient des nuisances sonores générées par les vols d'aéronefs pendant la journée, la Cour a estimé que l'article 8 entrait en ligne de compte car « le bruit des avions de l'aéroport de Heathrow a[vait] diminué la qualité de la vie privée et les agréments du foyer [de chacun] des requérants ".Dans l'affaire Baggs c. Royaume-Uni (no 9310/81, décision de la Commission du 16 octobre 1985, DR 44, p. 13), la propriété du requérant était sise à 400 mètres de la piste sud de l'aéroport de Heathrow.
La Cour elle-même, dans l'affaire Powell et Rayner c. Royaume-Uni (arrêt du 21 février 1990, série A no 172), où étaient également en cause les vols à Heathrow, a décliné, pour des motifs purement techniques, sa compétence pour connaître du grief au titre de l'article 8.
- EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE
Furthermore, even in relation to the positive obligations flowing from the first paragraph of Article 8 (art. 8-1), in striking the required balance the aims mentioned in the second paragraph (art. 8-2) may be of a certain relevance (see, in particular, the Rees v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, p. 15, para. 37, and the Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 18, para. 41). - BVerfG, 15.10.2009 - 1 BvR 3474/08
Verfassungsbeschwerden gegen Ergänzungsplanfeststellungsbeschluss für Flughafen …
Bei der subsidiären Prüfung des Gerichtshofs, ob der Vertragsstaat diesen Spielraum verletzt hat, sind auch die bereits getroffenen Lärmbekämpfungsmaßnahmen sowie die dem Betroffenen zustehenden verfahrensrechtlichen Sicherungen zu berücksichtigen (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 21. Februar 1990, Nr. 9310/81 - "Powell und Rayner/Vereinigtes Königreich" -, Rn. 40 ff.; Große Kammer…, Urteil vom 8. Juli 2003, Nr. 36022/97 - "Hatton u.a./Vereinigtes Königreich" -, NVwZ 2004, S. 1465 Rn. 96 ff. und 116 ff.). - EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
A complaint is characterised by the facts alleged in it and not merely by the legal grounds or arguments relied on (see Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 29, Series A no. 172, and Guerra and Others, cited above, § 44). - BVerfG, 29.07.2009 - 1 BvR 1606/08
Keine Grundrechtsverletzung durch Beschränkung des Geldausgleichs für teure …
Bei der subsidiären Prüfung des Gerichtshofs, ob der Vertragsstaat diesen Spielraum verletzt hat, sind auch die bereits getroffenen Lärmbekämpfungsmaßnahmen sowie die dem Betroffenen zustehenden verfahrensrechtlichen Sicherungen zu berücksichtigen (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 21. Februar 1990, Nr. 9310/81 - "Powell und Rayner/Vereinigtes Königreich" -, Rn. 40 ff.;… Große Kammer , Urteil vom 8. Juli 2003, Nr. 36022/97 - "Hatton u.a./Vereinigtes Königreich" -, NVwZ 2004, S. 1465 Rn. 96 ff. und 116 ff.). - EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96
ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI
Connected to this, he questioned the distinction between a restriction which delimits the substantive content properly speaking of the relevant civil right, to which the guarantees of Article 6 § 1 do not apply (see Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, pp. 16-17, § 36, and Z and Others, cited above, § 100), and a restriction which amounts to a procedural bar preventing the bringing of potential claims to court, to which Article 6 could have some application (see Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others, p. 1657, § 62; Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, §§ 48-49, ECHR 2001-XI; Fogarty, § 26; and McElhinney, § 25).In such cases the question whether any particular claim fell within this category or not would have had to have been decided by the courts on the basis of the relevant facts (see Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172) concerning the substantive limitation under section 76(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982).
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 25781/94
CHYPRE c. TURQUIE
The existence of such measures does not improve the applicant Government's case concerning the alleged administrative practice of violating Article 6. It recalls in this connection that the applicability of Article 6 is premised on the existence of an arguable cause of action in domestic law (see the above-mentioned Lithgow and Others judgment, p. 70, § 192, and the Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, pp. 16-17, § 36). - EGMR, 19.02.1998 - 14967/89
GUERRA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
A complaint is characterised by the facts alleged in it and not merely by the legal grounds or arguments relied on (see the Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 13, § 29). - EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 45749/06
Verletzung des Rechts auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung durch das …
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00
FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 67021/01
Tatar und Tatar ./. Rumänien
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 55597/09
NUNEZ v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08
BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
- EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 32715/06
Kübler ./. Deutschland
- EGMR, 22.05.2003 - 41666/98
KYRTATOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 486/14
Psychiatrie-Opfer scheitert mit erneuter Beschwerde
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 47039/11
HRISTOZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 4143/02
MORENO GÓMEZ c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 36022/97
HATTON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EuGH, 29.03.2001 - C-163/99
Portugal / Kommission
- EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85
HELMERS c. SUÈDE
- EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 3976/05
SERIFE YIGIT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.04.1996 - 15573/89
GUSTAFSSON v. SWEDEN
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.01.2005 - 14462/03
PENTIACOVA ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90
McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- VGH Hessen, 01.10.2013 - 9 C 573/12
Zur Festlegung von Anflugverfahren zum Flughafen Frankfurt Main (sog. …
- EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 45305/99
POWELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90
FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11
BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. MALTA
- EGMR, 16.12.1997 - 21353/93
CAMENZIND v. SWITZERLAND
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 26.05.2005 - C-176/03
Kommission / Rat - Umwelt - Schutz durch das Strafrecht - Rechtsgrundlage - …
- EGMR, 25.11.1994 - 18131/91
STJERNA c. FINLANDE
- EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 11810/03
MAURICE v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 22743/07
OTGON v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 11796/85
WIESINGER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 45291/06
PREVITI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 47017/09
Abschiebung, Pakistan, Norwegen, Aufenthaltstitel, Verwurzelung, vorsätzliche …
- EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 41138/98
MOLDOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 39032/97
SMITS, KLEYN, METTLER TOLEDO B.V. ET AL., RAYMAKERS, VERENIGING LANDELIJK OVERLEG …
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95
T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 37650/97
MANNERS AND 4 OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 59909/00
GIACOMELLI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 510/04
TØNSBERGS BLAD AS AND HAUKOM v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23687/05
IVANTOC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 40877/98
CORDOVA c. ITALIE (N° 1)
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 15312/89
G. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 70055/10
S.J. c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 44084/10
GÜLAY ÇETIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 1513/03
DRAON c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 38621/97
ZEHNALOVÁ ET ZEHNAL c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 24095/94
EFSTRATIOU v. GREECE
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 3289/10
BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 12214/07
EGMEZ v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 64301/01
VELCEA ET MAZARE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 1944/10
MATEESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 60255/00
PEREIRA HENRIQUES c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 56550/00
MÓLKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 21787/93
VALSAMIS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 28727/11
KUDESHKINA v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 24202/10
Maempel ./. Malta
- EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 25282/06
DOLENEC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 58447/00
ZAVOLOKA c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 22893/05
RODIC ET AUTRES c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 32927/03
KAJA c. GRECE
- EGMR, 10.02.2004 - 42023/98
NAOUMENKO c. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 75031/13
KAPA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 61260/08
OLUIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 37379/02
POP BLAGA c. ROUMANIE (No. I)
- EGMR, 16.05.2000 - 36022/97
HATTON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02
MILEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 32495/03
BALYEMEZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 12694/04
LACATUS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 22251/07
G.R. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 48907/99
AHTINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 14379/03
B. S. gegen Deutschland
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27436/95
STEWART-BRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 28475/14
BAGNIEWSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 22254/14
ERMÉNYI v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 3675/04
FLAMENBAUM ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 26940/10
ANTWI AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 2899/05
IYILIK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 38155/02
STEFANICA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 29889/04
VANJAK v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 12605/03
LEON AND AGNIESZKA KANIA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 25165/94
AKDENIZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 45649/99
CORDOVA v. ITALY (No. 2)
- EKMR, 12.10.1994 - 19760/92
KETONEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 10890/04
HANU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.07.1998 - 20390/92
TINNELLY & SONS LTD AND OTHERS AND McELDUFF AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 24950/94
KINNUNEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 26429/07
S.C. FIERCOLECT IMPEX S.R.L. v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10
SAMACHISA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 33037/07
BAYAR ET GÜRBÜZ c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 63206/10
JÜSSI OSAWE v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12
MARKU v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 19.11.2013 - 28357/11
AVDIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 21788/06
BALAKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 61654/08
MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ ET PINO MANZANO c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 16.04.2009 - 49000/06
ANTONOPOULOU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
MARINI c. ALBANIE
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 2834/05
SAMPSONIDIS ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 10699/05
PAULIK v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 23053/02
IELO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 09.09.2004 - 9808/02
STOICHKOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 04.05.2004 - 61821/00
ZILIBERBERG v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 39561/98
ASHWORTH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 44997/10
GÜRBÜZ ET BAYAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 28766/06
KIPS DOO AND DREKALOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 24067/05
KÖSEOGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 54999/10
MILIC ET NIKEZIC c. MONTÉNÉGRO
- EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 27310/09
UDOVICIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 11871/05
HADADE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 28233/08
KUDUMIJA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND SERBIA AND REMENOVIC AND MASOVIC v. BOSNIA …
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 26501/05
EPARHIJA BUDIMLJANSKO-NIKSICKA AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 3434/05
YERME c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 4543/09
DUKIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 41775/06
SERCAU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 38998/09
ROIDAKIS v. GREECE (No. 3)
- EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 4488/03
E.M.B. v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 5591/07
ALLEN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
PAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2010/06
KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 19728/02
AKGÜL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 73792/01
SULTAN ÖNER ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 7632/04
BRECHOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 75218/01
COLLECTIF NATIONAL D'INFORMATION ET D'OPPOSITION A L'USINE MELOX - COLLECTIF STOP …
- EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 15535/02
CHIZZOTTI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27693/95
CELIKBILEK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.01.2003 - 23379/94
KIENAST v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 56483/00
JANCIKOVA v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 16.05.2002 - 41424/98
NUVOLI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 20.12.2001 - 25639/94
F.L. c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 25.10.2001 - 41879/98
SAGGIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 25.05.1999 - 41220/98
ALIEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.02.1996 - 21928/93
HUSSAIN c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 21.02.1996 - 23389/94
SINGH c. ROYAUME UNI
- EGMR, 10.05.2022 - 47987/15
SOLYANIK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 13482/15
TOLIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 26.04.2018 - 74884/13
TSARPELAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 45558/08
CHIRIAC v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 49816/08
ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 53399/08
SHLYKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 32504/11
KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 42820/09
TUDOR v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 37090/08
SOLANELLES MOLLAR c. ANDORRE
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33242/05
CIUBOTARU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 21532/08
MARTINEZ MARTINEZ c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 30911/06
PASTOR AND TICLETE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 58919/09
D. M. c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 47672/09
MOCNY v. POLAND
- EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 33798/05
RUZA v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 27436/04
RUSSU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 25333/03
PETER c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 39870/06
EKONOMI c. GRECE
- EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 28261/07
PAPATHEOFANOUS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 21158/05
KUPREYANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 71146/01
BORYSIEWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 6817/04
WALKUSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.04.2008 - 43347/04
ZERELLA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 32978/03
PEREZ ARIAS c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 29054/03
TETOUROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 08.02.2005 - 60033/00
L.M. c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 64013/00
LEFEBVRE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 47491/99
SERT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 73936/01
DE JORIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 45824/99
SEN and OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.02.2003 - 45624/99
AKBULUT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 42472/98
TKACIK v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 42137/98
O.Ö. v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 39826/98
SOYSEVER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45823/99
ACARCA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45376/99
AKSOY v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45627/99
ÖNCE v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45631/99
BASPINAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45824/99
CELIKATES and OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45822/99
BALCI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 48718/99
BALCI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 47503/99
GÜNDOGDU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 47500/99
YÜGÜRÜK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45378/99
DAL AND ÖZEN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 44199/98
ÖZCAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45555/99
ÖZDAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 42788/98
DUMAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 45373/99
DAGLI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 39682/98
PEKTAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 01.10.2002 - 53566/99
MÜSLIM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.03.2002 - 24265/94
DEVENNEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 27.02.2002 - 36737/97
GUIDI contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2001 - 48818/99
MICHALIKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 36200/97
GENEL contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2000 - 43378/98
LAMPASOVA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 29.06.2000 - 41384/98
VARGA v. THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
- EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 25170/94
LIEBSCHER AND HÜBL v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 08.06.1990 - 13564/88
LYSESTOL c. NORVEGE
- EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 38695/13
KOZUL AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 62825/10
KOSTORNOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.08.2014 - 10747/09
CHISLENSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 1733/06
KOCENIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 10226/08
KALUDEROVIC-BRAJOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 42565/09
GROSUL c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 18626/11
VUKOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 15237/03
SELARIU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 17187/05
RADUCANU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 6051/07
NELISSEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 24.08.2010 - 5666/04
TRAILESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 1319/07
GARCIA c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 16480/02
RUPAR v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 18814/05
ERYILMAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 37846/04
PINCZE v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 2045/06
KOURIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 10.04.2007 - 5332/05
FAUCONNIER c. GRECE
- EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 34971/02
ESPOSITO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 08.03.2007 - 23241/04
ARMA c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 66083/01
GAZIKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 75287/01
RUANO MORCUENDE c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 2895/03
ATMATZIDI c. GRECE
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 26941/03
KEFALA c. GRECE
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 1985/03
GRYLLI c. GRECE
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 41621/02
ZAFIROPOULOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 37253/02
GIANNAKOPOULOU c. GRECE
- EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 1002/02
OFFICE CULTUREL DE CLUNY c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 28.10.2004 - 33925/02
KAFASIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 52567/99
SANDOR and OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 9294/02
ZENNARI contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 46115/99
BENEDEK v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39443/98
CEVIK contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39333/98
GÖKDOGAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39323/98
KATI contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39331/98
SENGÜLEC contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39337/98
ÖZCAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39332/98
DOGRUER contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39334/98
CINAR contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 39336/98
MERAL contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 39068/97
TAHTA contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.05.2002 - 39071/97
ISIK contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 32960/96
AKKOC contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 35829/97
KIRATOGLU contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 35856/97
ULUDAG contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 35976/97
TAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 32323/96
DEMIR contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 38918/97
DAVUTER contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 36193/97
APUHAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 36684/97
TUNAY contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 37953/97
ERCIYEZ contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 36759/97
KAZGAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 37405/97
TEMIZYÜREK contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 34493/97
BAS contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 36682/97
KELES contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 36943/97
YAVAS contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 37963/97
ÖZTÜRK contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 35068/97
ÖZTIRYAKI contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 36683/97
YILDIRIM contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 34475/96
ÖZCAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 34490/97
M.E. contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38926/97
YILMAZ contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 36201/97
YAKA contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 34477/96
YEL contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 36680/97
ALTUNTAS contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 35078/97
YÜKSEL contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 35080/97
ÖZLÜ contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 34479/97
BALCIK contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 32443/96
H.K. contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 38603/97
DEMIRHAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 36196/97
CAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 38590/97
BÜYÜKKIRABALI contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 38589/97
CORBACI contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 38601/97
SEN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 38591/97
BASKAYA contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 35069/97
GEZER contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 32359/96
CORBACI contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 36198/97
DALGIC contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 38917/97
BEYZADEOGLU contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 35081/97
ATES contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 36595/97
MOGULKOC contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 38592/97
TANAL contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 37960/97
A.C. contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 31990/96
INKAYA ET AUTRES contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 32322/96
ARAS contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.09.2001 - 45049/98
CLUNIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 11.09.2001 - 32358/96
UYANIK contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 36858/97
MAURY contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 43239/98
HOLOVATY c. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 01.02.2000 - 44003/98
THOMASSON ET DIVIER contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 31084/96
VARGA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 18.05.1999 - 35712/97
BARCLAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 19.01.1999 - 33763/96
WEBORA v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 19.10.1998 - 31416/96
PENDRAGON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 18.09.1998 - 43363/98
C.N. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 38387/97
KHATUN AND 180 OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 37664/97
R.C. ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 38698/97
SYKES AND 9 OTHERS, SALOOM AND 3 OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 20.05.1998 - 23759/94
W.J. v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 20.05.1998 - 31813/96
A.R. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 20.05.1998 - 31814/96
P.V. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 20.05.1998 - 31815/96
A.B. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 20.05.1998 - 31816/96
S.A. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 20.05.1998 - 33466/96
SINKO v. THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
- EKMR, 12.03.1998 - 35356/97
SNOWDON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 02.03.1998 - 32884/96
OUATTARA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 15.01.1998 - 36384/97
B.S., E. AND N.P.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 15.01.1998 - 36053/97
STOCKTON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 25029/94
GLOWACKI v. POLAND
- EKMR, 27.10.1997 - 33689/96
ANDERSON AND NINE OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 23.10.1997 - 33694/96
QUINN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 31233/96
B.W. AND W.W. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 32338/96
HODGETTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 28892/95
McKONE ESTATES LIMITED v. IRELAND
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27552/95
MACHATOVÁ v. THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 29328/95
KOSKINEN v. FINLAND
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 32540/96
WOOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 32556/95
BELLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 21.05.1997 - 32214/96
E.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 30402/96
BARRETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 29802/96
STROJK v. POLAND
- EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 31811/96
TIMES NEWSPAPERS LIMITED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 26521/95
PARSONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 27558/95
BURROWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 10.09.1996 - 31600/96
BURTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 28188/95
TYRRELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 30887/96
LONCARIC v. SLOVENIA
- EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 25169/44
MUSA v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 27007/95
SPECKMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 11.04.1996 - 25132/94
B.B. v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 16.01.1996 - 22446/93
SCHUSCHOU v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 16.01.1996 - 27043/95
JENNY v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 22836/93
N. and subsequently I.L. v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 25060/94
HAIDER c. AUTRICHE
- EKMR, 14.09.1995 - 26516/95
BHUYIAN v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 22335/93
MÜLLER v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 24101/94
MÜLLER v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 23855/94
MÜLLER v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 05.04.1995 - 20592/92
OLSSON v. NORWAY
- EKMR, 27.02.1995 - 21353/93
B.C. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 11.01.1995 - 22052/93
TRAKZEL v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 12.10.1994 - 19853/92
SJÖSTRÖM v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 02.09.1994 - 23830/94
KRUETZI v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 29.06.1994 - 23822/94
LAM v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 08.03.1994 - 20490/92
ISKCON ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 8144/07
ELISEEV AND RUSKI ELITNI KLUB v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 22768/12
JAKELJIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 25194/08
PLACHTA ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 43543/09
CONSTANTIN TUDOR v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 38797/07
GREEN AND FARHAT v. MALTA
- EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 24034/07
ANUSCA v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 20674/07
KLOCEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 7802/05
DARMON v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 30789/05
FERENC ROZSA AND ISTVAN ROZSA v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 36150/03
APARICIO BENITO c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 32155/04
NOEL BAKER ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 43991/02
FONSECA MENDES c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 20.01.2005 - 37806/02
ASTIKOS OIKODOMIKOS SYNETAIRISMOS NEA KONSTANTINOUPOLIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 46643/99
KAYSERI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.09.2001 - 31876/96
TEPELI ET AUTRES contre la TURQUIE
- EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 28485/95
GLASS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 28485/95
GLASS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 28576/95
MATTHEWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 06.09.1996 - 24875/94
LOGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 18.05.1995 - 21603/93
SELVARATNAM v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 10.10.1994 - 21343/93
UUHINIEMI AND 14 OTHERS v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 73888/16
MLADENOV AND ANAGNOSTOPOULOS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 51016/11
OVRAN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 24883/13
YEFIMENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 22367/09
YURKEVICH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 77928/01
VRABEL v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 970/04
SULTANA v. MALTA
- EGMR, 13.09.2007 - 26744/05
CANALI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 47237/99
LACKO AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 39070/97
USTA contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 38920/97
KARACA contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 38930/97
ZÜLFIKAROGLU contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 46548/99
MARINKOVIC v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 36594/97
KÖSE contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.07.2001 - 41671/98
LAM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 23.03.1999 - 33500/96
PEJCINOSKI v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 08.12.1998 - 36966/97
SIMMER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EKMR, 18.09.1998 - 43391/98
K.K. v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 27.05.1998 - 37416/97
KAPPA KANZLEI UND BÜROBETRIEBS GmbH AND OTHERS AND VIVA REISEVERANSTALTUNGS GmbH …
- EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 31513/96
HILDEBRAND v. GERMANY
- EKMR, 21.05.1997 - 32530/95
O.H.S. AND G.R. v. FINLAND
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28122/95
HUTCHEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 28.02.1996 - 25959/94
COHEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 24579/94
KETO-TOKOI AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
- EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 20560/92
KOSKINEN v. FINLAND
- EKMR, 12.01.1991 - 14401/88
A. ET K.B.F. c. TURQUIE