Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1993,15253
EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88 (https://dejure.org/1993,15253)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.11.1993 - 13972/88 (https://dejure.org/1993,15253)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. November 1993 - 13972/88 (https://dejure.org/1993,15253)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,15253) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • Serie A Nr. 275
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (279)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 24.05.1991 - 12744/87

    QUARANTA c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    36; Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, Series A no. 205, pp.

    32-33, and the Quaranta judgment, cited above, Series A no. 205, p. 16, para.

    It thus leaves to the Contracting States the choice of the means of ensuring that it is secured in their judicial systems, the Court's task being only to ascertain whether the method they have chosen is consistent with the requirements of a fair trial (see the Quaranta judgment previously cited, Series A no. 205, p. 16, para. 30).

  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    The right set out in paragraph 3 (c) of Article 6 (art. 6-3-c) is one element, amongst others, of the concept of a fair trial in criminal proceedings contained in paragraph 1 (art. 6-1) mutatis mutandis, the Artico v. Italy judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 15, paras.

    In this respect, it must be remembered that the Convention is designed to "guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective" and that assigning a counsel does not in itself ensure the effectiveness of the assistance he may afford an accused (see the Artico judgment previously cited, Series A no. 37, p. 16, para. 33).

  • EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10444/83

    LAMY c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    17; Lamy v. Belgium, 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151, p. 18, para.
     
  • EGMR, 19.12.1990 - 11444/85

    DELTA c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    37; Delta v. France, 19 December 1990, Series A no. 191-A, p. 16, para.
  • EGMR, 30.09.1985 - 9300/81

    CAN v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    95-99; Can v. Austria, 30 September 1985, Series A no. 96, p. 10, para.
  • EGMR, 28.11.1991 - 12629/87

    S. v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    28 and 36; and S. v. Switzerland, 28 November 1991, Series A no. 220, pp.
  • EGMR, 28.11.1978 - 6210/73

    Luedicke, Belkacem und Koç ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    91; Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç v. Germany, 28 November 1978, Series A no. 29, p. 20, para.
  • EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

    Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    The "reasonable time" mentioned in paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), for instance, begins to run from the moment a "charge" comes into being, within the autonomous, substantive meaning to be given to that term (see, for example, the Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, pp. 26-27, para. 19, and the Messina v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-H, p. 103, para. 25); the Court has occasionally even found that a reasonable time has been exceeded in a case that ended with a discharge (see the Maj v. Italy judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 196-D, p. 43, paras. 13-15) or at the investigation stage (see the Viezzer v. Italy judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 196-B, p. 21, paras. 15-17).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

    CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    48; Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, pp.
  • EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

    KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
    However that may be, the applicant did not at the outset have the necessary legal support, but "a State cannot be held responsible for every shortcoming on the part of a lawyer appointed for legal aid purposes" (see the Kamasinski v. Austria judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, p. 33, para. 65) or chosen by the accused.
  • EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 9154/10

    Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Al-Khawaja-Test; Recht auf ein …

    So kann Artikel 6 - insbesondere sein Absatz 3 - eine Rolle spielen, bevor das Tatgericht angerufen wird, wenn und insoweit die ursprüngliche Nichtbeachtung dieses Artikels den fairen Charakter der Verhandlung in schwerwiegender Weise zu gefährden droht (Salduz, a.a.O., Rdnr. 50 mit einem Verweis auf Imbrioscia./. Schweiz, 24. November 1993, Rdnr. 36, Serie A, Bd. 275).
  • EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 46221/99

    Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (Freiheit der Person; rechtmäßige …

    "... The Court reiterates that Article 6 may also be relevant before a case is sent for trial if and in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with it ( Imbrioscia v. Switzerland , judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, § 36).
  • EGMR, 08.02.1996 - 18731/91

    JOHN MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    In this respect it recalls its finding in the Imbrioscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993 that Article 6 (art. 6) - especially paragraph 3 (art. 6-3) - may be relevant before a case is sent for trial if and so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (art. 6-3) (Series A no. 275, p. 13, para. 36).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht