Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11508/85   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1989,12446
EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11508/85 (https://dejure.org/1989,12446)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.02.1989 - 11508/85 (https://dejure.org/1989,12446)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. Februar 1989 - 11508/85 (https://dejure.org/1989,12446)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1989,12446) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Papierfundstellen

  • Serie A Nr. 149
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (79)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84

    MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11508/85
    In so doing, the Court must consider the impugned judgment of 3 July 1984 in the light of the case as a whole, including the relevant statements in the applicant's article and the context in which they were written; in particular, it must determine whether the interference at issue was "proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued", due regard being had to the importance of freedom of expression in a democratic society (see the Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, pp. 21-22, paras. 32-33).

    Democracy is an open system of government in which the freedom of expression plays a fundamental role, as the Court stated in its judgment in the Handyside case (7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 29, para. 49, and most recently in the Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 21, para. 32).

  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11508/85
    Democracy is an open system of government in which the freedom of expression plays a fundamental role, as the Court stated in its judgment in the Handyside case (7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 29, para. 49, and most recently in the Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 21, para. 32).
  • EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 14277/04

    GUJA v. MOLDOVA

    It reiterates in this context that open discussion of topics of public concern is essential to democracy and regard must be had to the great importance of not discouraging members of the public from voicing their opinions on such matters (see, Barfod v. Denmark, judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, § 29).
  • EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

    KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

    In exercising its supervisory jurisdiction, the Court must look at the impugned judicial decisions against the background of the case as a whole (see, inter alia and mutatis mutandis, the Barfod v. Denmark judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, p. 12, para. 28).
  • EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

    MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

    The Court has consistently held that the Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing the existence and extent of the necessity of an interference, but this margin is subject to a European supervision as regards both the legislation and the decisions applying it, even those given by an independent court (see, as the most recent authority, the Barfod judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, p. 12, § 28).

    In exercising its power of review, the Court must look at the impugned court decision in the light of the case as a whole (see the above-mentioned Barfod judgment, Series A no. 149, p. 12, § 28).

    [5] Barfod judgment, 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, p. 12, § 28; see also Barthold judgment, cited above, loc.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht