Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  COSSEY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 12 MRK
  Non-violation de l'Art. 8 Non-violation de l'Art. 12 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 12 MRK
  No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 12 (englisch)

Papierfundstellen

• Serie A Nr. 184

Wird zitiert von ... (50)Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  Judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 13, para.

  Judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31.

• EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81

  REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  It therefore has to determine whether the two cases are distinguishable on their facts or whether it should depart from the judgment which it gave in the former case on 17 October 1986 (Series A no. 106; "the Rees judgment").

  Van Oosterwijck judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40; Rees judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106; and Cossey judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 184.

• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  See, mutatis mutandis, the Olsson judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 37, para.

 
• EGMR, 18.12.1987 - 11329/85

  F. v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  But for paragraph 46 of its present judgment (see note 34), a first indication of such an approach in the Court's case-law might, perhaps, have been discerned in its F. v. Switzerland judgment of 18 December 1987 (Series A no. 128): anyhow, there the Court was prepared to verify whether national law is compatible with Article 12 (art. 12) to an extent that seems considerably greater than in the Rees case.
• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10964/84

  BROZICEK v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  Judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167.
• BGH, 21.09.1971 - IV ZB 61/70

  Ausgestaltung des Namensrechts bei Transsexuellen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  See, amongst others, the following decisions: Cour de Cassation: 16 December 1975, D. 1976, 397; 30 November 1983, D. 1984, 165; 3 March 1987 and 31 March 1987, D. 1987, 445 (France); HR 13 December 1973, NJ 1975, 130 and HR 3 January 1975, NJ 1975, 187 (Netherlands); BGH 21 September 1971, BGHZ 57, 63 (West Germany).
• BVerfG, 11.10.1978 - 1 BvR 16/72

  Transsexuelle I

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  BVerfGE 49, 286.
• EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

  DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  27; judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, para.
• EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

  MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  41; judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, p. 31, para.
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84

  Van Oosterwijck judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40; Rees judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106; and Cossey judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 184.
• EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79

  Inze ./. Österreich
• EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83

  NORRIS c. IRLANDE
• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82

  JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND
• EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 12726/87

  AUTRONIC AG v. SWITZERLAND

• EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 9300/07

  Herrmann ./. Deutschland

  Der symbolische Fall in diesem Bereich ist die Rechtssache Cossey./. Vereinigtes Königreich (27. September 1990, Rdnr. 32, Serie A Band 184), in der der Gerichtshof die Auffassung vertrat, dass sich der Sachverhalt von dem in der Rechtssache Rees unterscheide, er jedoch nicht davon überzeugt sei, dass dieser Unterschied "zum Tragen" komme.
• EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04

  SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA

  Cossey judgment of 27 September 1990 (no. 10843/84, concerning the particular position of transsexual persons) that the restriction of marriage to this "traditional" concept was objectively justified, observing "... that attachment to the traditional concept of marriage provides sufficient reason for the continued adoption of biological criteria for determining a person's sex for the purposes of marriage.' [The subsequent change in the caselaw concerning the particular issue of transsexuals (ECHR, Goodwin, no. 28957/95, 11 July 2002) does not permit the conclusion that there should be any change in the assessment of the general question at issue here.] The fact that samesex relationships fall within the concept of private life and as such enjoy the protection of Article 8 of the ECHR ­ which also prohibits discrimination on nonobjective grounds (Article 14 of the ECHR) ­ does not give rise to an obligation to change the law of marriage.

  Consequently, this was considered a matter encompassed within the power of the Contracting States to regulate by national law the exercise of the right to marry (see Sheffield and Horsham, cited above, § 67; Cossey v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1990, § 46, Series A no. 184; see also Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, §§ 49-50, Series A no. 106).

• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Afin de déterminer s'il existe une obligation positive, il faut prendre en compte - souci sous-jacent à la Convention tout entière - le juste équilibre à ménager entre l'intérêt général et les intérêts de l'individu (arrêt Cossey c. Royaume-Uni du 27 septembre 1990, série A no 184, p. 15, § 37).

 
• BVerfG, 27.04.2021 - 2 BvR 206/14

  Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen eine im Verfahren der gegenseitigen Anerkennung …

  In der Sache und in der Auslegung durch den Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte enthält auch die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention entwicklungsoffene (vgl. zur Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention als "living instrument" EGMR, Tyrer v. United Kingdom, Urteil vom 25. April 1978, Nr. 5856/72, § 31; Marckx v. Belgium, Urteil vom 13. Juni 1979, Nr. 6833/74, § 41; Airey v. Ireland, Urteil vom 9. Oktober 1979, Nr. 6289/73, § 26; Rees v. United Kingdom, Urteil vom 17. Oktober 1986, Nr. 9532/81, § 47; Cossey v. United Kingdom, Urteil vom 27. September 1990, Nr. 10843/84, § 35; Loizidou v. Turkey , Urteil vom 23. März 1995, Nr. 15318/89, § 71), mit den nationalen Verfassungen zunehmend konvergente Garantien von Freiheit und Gleichheit des Einzelnen und sichert diese gegenüber Eingriffen des Staates ab, wenn jene nicht gesetzlich vorgesehen und in einer demokratischen Gesellschaft notwendig sind (vgl. z.B. Art. 8 Abs. 2 EMRK).
• EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 79885/12

  A.P., GARÇON ET NICOT c. FRANCE

  Dans l'affaire Cossey c. Royaume-Uni (no 10843/84, 27 septembre 1990), la Cour a abouti à des conclusions similaires, et elle a noté en outre qu'une annotation dans le registre des naissances n'aurait pas représenté une solution appropriée.
• EGMR, 18.01.2001 - 27238/95

  CHAPMAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  La Convention étant avant tout un mécanisme de défense des droits de l'homme, la Cour doit cependant tenir compte de l'évolution de la situation dans les Etats contractants et réagir, par exemple, au consensus susceptible de se faire jour quant aux normes à atteindre (voir, entre autres, l'arrêt Cossey c. Royaume-Uni du 27 septembre 1990, série A no 184, p. 14, § 35).

  La Convention doit toujours s'interpréter et s'appliquer à la lumière des conditions actuelles (arrêt Cossey c. Royaume-Uni du 27 septembre 1990, série A no 184, p. 17, § 42).

• EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13343/87

  B. c. FRANCE

  This is the case especially where the positive obligations implicit in that concept are concerned, as in the instant case (see the Rees v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, p. 14, para. 35, and the Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 184, p. 15, para. 36), and its requirements will vary considerably from case to case according to the practices followed and the situations obtaining in the Contracting States.

  (b) As regards the legal aspects of the problem, Miss B. relied on the dissenting opinion of Judge Martens, annexed to the Cossey judgment (Series A no. 184, pp. 35-36, para. 5.5); the differences which still subsisted between the member States of the Council of Europe as to the attitude to be adopted towards transsexuals (ibid., p. 16, para. 40) were counterbalanced to an increasing extent by developments in the legislation and case-law of many of those States.

  Further, according to the Court's case-law as stated in the two previous judgments relating to transsexuals in the United Kingdom, the Rees v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 October 1986 (Series A no. 106) and the Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990 (Series A no. 184) - the latter given in a case which was virtually identical to the present one -, the question of the amendment of the birth certificates of transsexuals who wish to have an indication of sex noted in the civil status register is a question for the national authorities and their legislative or judicial powers, who are best in a position to respond to the needs or hopes of each society and "the requirements of the situation pertaining there in determining what measures to adopt" (see the above-mentioned Rees judgment, p. 17, para. 42 (a)).

  I am satisfied that the judgments of the Court in the case of Rees (Series A no. 106) and in the case of Cossey (Series A no. 184) respectively were correct in principle and that there is nothing in the present case to warrant a departure from them.

• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Since the Convention is first and foremost a system for the protection of human rights, the Court must however have regard to the changing conditions in the respondent State and in the Contracting States in general and respond, for example, to any emerging consensus as to the standards to be achieved (see, among other judgments, Cossey v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1990, § 35, Series A no. 184, and Stafford v. the United Kingdom (GC), no. 46295/99, §§ 67-68, ECHR-2002-IV).
• EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 35968/97

  Rechtssache V. K. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  In seinem Urteil in der Sache Cossey war der Gerichtshof der Ansicht, es habe seit dem Erlass seines Urteils in der Sache Rees keine nennenswerten wissenschaftlichen Entwicklungen im Bereich der Transsexualität gegeben, die eine Abweichung von der in dieser Rechtssache getroffenen Entscheidung zwingend erfordere ( Cossey ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Urteil vom 27. September 1990, Serie A, Band 184, S. 17, Nr. 40).
• EGMR, 30.07.1998 - 22985/93

  SHEFFIELD ET HORSHAM c. ROYAUME-UNI

  The Court reiterated that view in its Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990 (Series A no. 184, p. 17, § 41).

  In its Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990 (Series A no. 184) the Court was faced with essentially the same question and, by the much narrower vote of ten to eight, reaffirmed its judgment in the Rees case.

  And in its Cossey judgment the Court expressly raised the question whether a departure from its Rees judgment was warranted in order to ensure that the interpretation of Article 8 on the point in issue remain in line with present-day conditions (Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 184, pp. 14 and 16, §§ 35 and 40).

  This urge for full legal recognition is part of the transsexual's plight" (Series A no. 184, p. 23).

  To the extent that there are certain specific features of any relevance, these may be taken into consideration when adopting the required measures, since no uniform model has to be followed in that respect (see also Judges Bindschedler-Robert and Russo in their joint partly dissenting opinion in the Cossey case and Judge Martens in his dissenting opinion in that case, Series A no. 184, pp. 20 and 29-30 respectively).

• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08

  Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung
• EuGH, 17.02.1998 - C-249/96

  EINE DISKRIMINIERUNG AUFGRUND DER SEXUELLEN ORIENTIERUNG FÄLLT GEGENWÄRTIG NICHT …
• EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90

  VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 22.04.1997 - 21830/93

  X, Y AND Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 25.11.1994 - 18131/91

  STJERNA c. FINLANDE
• EuGH, 12.12.2013 - C-425/12

  Portgás - Verfahren zur Vergabe öffentlicher Aufträge im Bereich der Wasser-, …
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 12005/86

  BORGERS v. BELGIUM
• EGMR, 11.10.2018 - 55216/08

  Italien verurteilt: Warten auf den neuen Namen
• EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14793/08

  Transsexualität: Recht auf Geschlechtsumwandlung gestärkt
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 29002/06

  SCHLUMPF c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 25680/94

  I. c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 46295/99

  STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 2145/16

  X ET Y c. ROUMANIE
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 18.09.2013 - C-425/12

  Portgás
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 56501/00

  MATA ESTEVEZ v. SPAIN
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 14.12.1995 - C-13/94

  P gegen S und Cornwall County Council. - Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen …
• EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 28957/95

  GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 35214/09

  ALDEGUER TOMÁS v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 42971/05

  PARRY c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 27.09.2001 - 36797/97

  G.M.B. AND K.M. v. SWITZERLAND
• EGMR, 18.01.2001 - 25154/94

  JANE SMITH c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 18.01.2001 - 25289/94

  LEE c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 18.01.2001 - 24882/94

  BEARD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 32570/03

  GRANT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 16219/90

  DEMADES v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 35748/05

  R. AND F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EKMR, 19.01.1996 - 22985/93

  SHEFFIELD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 18.09.2003 - 44568/98

  R.L. et M.-J.D. contre la FRANCE
• EGMR, 18.01.2001 - 24876/94

  COSTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 28575/95

  CLARK AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 32263/96

  HARRISON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 34334/96

  SMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 40435/98

  SMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 39664/98

  EATSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 47953/99

  PORTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EKMR, 23.10.1997 - 31177/96

  ROETZHEIM c. ALLEMAGNE
• EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 28485/95

  GLASS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EKMR, 19.01.1996 - 23390/94

  HORSHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 18.07.1994 - 15484/89

  WYNNE c. ROYAUME-UNI