Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 72749/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,56318) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRAVCHUK v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 72749/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of the proceedings is to be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, regard being had to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and that of the authorities, what was at stake for the applicant etc. In addition, only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of a failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 11, § 24; see also Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, ECHR 1999-II, § 67). - EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 46072/99
ZASKIEWICZ v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 72749/01
The Court may also take into account the number of instances involved in the course of the proceedings (see Zaskiewicz v. Poland, no. 46072/99, 11 December 2001). - EGMR, 13.07.1983 - 8737/79
Zimmermann und Steiner ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 72749/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of the proceedings is to be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, regard being had to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and that of the authorities, what was at stake for the applicant etc. In addition, only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of a failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 11, § 24; see also Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, ECHR 1999-II, § 67).
- EGMR, 25.09.2006 - 22731/02
MARTINOVSKA v.
Once the enforcement procedures were closed by a court in accordance with the national legislation, the responsibility of the State ended (see Shestakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 48757/99, 18 June 2002; Kravchuk v. Russia (dec.), no. 72749/01, 1 February 2005).