Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 38228/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,71648) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 38228/05
- EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 38228/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 38228/05
As such, there was no need to afford the applicant a possibility to advance any different defence than the one used at the original trial (see, a contrario, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 60, ECHR 1999-II, and Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 55, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 29900/96
SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 38228/05
As such, there was no need to afford the applicant a possibility to advance any different defence than the one used at the original trial (see, a contrario, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 60, ECHR 1999-II, and Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 55, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88
KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 38228/05
It also embodies, more generally, the principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) and the principle that the criminal law must not be extensively construed to an accused's detriment; it follows from this that an offence must be clearly defined in law (see Kokkinakis v. Greece, judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 22, § 52).