Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ASANI v. \

  Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of witnesses) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ASANI v. \

  [ALB] Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ASANI v. \

  [MAC] Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ASANI v. \

  [MAC] Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ASANI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85

  KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 27962/10

  However, regarding anonymous witnesses the Court has also found that the nature and scope of those questions were considerably restricted by reason of the trial court's decision that the anonymity of the witnesses should be preserved (see Kostovski v. the Netherlands, 20 November 1989, § 42, Series A no. 166).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 8088/05

  GABRIELYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 27962/10

  29900/96 and 3 others, § 67, ECHR 2001-VIII and Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 81, 10 April 2012); they must have actively searched for such witnesses (see Rachdad v. France, no. 71846/01, § 24, 13 November 2003).
• EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 29900/96

  SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 27962/10

  29900/96 and 3 others, § 67, ECHR 2001-VIII and Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 81, 10 April 2012); they must have actively searched for such witnesses (see Rachdad v. France, no. 71846/01, § 24, 13 November 2003).

• EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 56440/15

  SNIJDERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  The Court reiterates that in the case of a fully anonymous witness, where no details whatsoever as to the witness' identity or background are known, the defence faces the difficulty of being unable to put to the witness any reasons which the witness may have for lying (see Asani v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27962/10, § 36, 1 February 2018).

  It also reiterates, and rightly so, that in the case of a fully anonymous witness, where no details whatsoever as to the witness' identity or background are known, the defence faces the difficulty of being unable to put to the witness any reasons which the witness may have for lying (see Asani v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27962/10, § 36, 1 February 2018).

• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 37404/18

  OGUZ v. TÜRKIYE

  In particular, the absence of an explicit objection by the applicant to the statements of the anonymous witness being read out at the hearing cannot be interpreted as an unequivocal waiver on his part of the right to examine this witness (compare also Asani v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27962/10, § 52, 1 February 2018).
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 24481/15

  ANDI MARIUS IONESCU c. ROUMANIE

  S'agissant de la condamnation du requérant sans avoir eu la possibilité de faire interroger I.N., la Cour examinera ce grief sous l'angle des dispositions combinées de l'article 6 §§ 1 et 3 d) de la Convention (Schatschaschwili c. Allemagne [GC], no 9154/10, § 100, CEDH 2015), à la lumière des principes pertinents exposés dans les arrêts Al-Khawaja et Tahery c. Royaume-Uni [GC] (nos 26766/05 et 22228/06, §§ 118-147, CEDH 2011), Schatschaschwili (précité, §§ 100-130) et Asani c. l'ex-Republique yougoslave de Macédoine (no 27962/10, §§ 36-37, 1er février 2018).
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 49951/16

  TORJ c. ROUMANIE

  La Cour renvoie aux principes bien établis qu'il convient d'appliquer dans toute affaire où le tribunal admet à titre de preuve les déclarations antérieures d'un témoin à charge n'ayant pas comparu au procès (Al-Khawaja et Tahery c. Royaume-Uni [GC], nos 26766/05 et 2222/06, §§ 118-147, CEDH 2011 ; Schatschaschwili c. Allemagne [GC] no 9154/10, §§ 100-130, CEDH 2015 et Asani c. l'ex-Republique yougoslave de Macédoine, no 27962/10, §§ 36-37, 1er février 2018).
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 71034/13

  BOSHKOSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  They can be viewed, therefore, as specific aspects of the concept of a fair trial in criminal proceedings in Article 6 § 1 (see, for example, Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, §§ 250-52, 13 September 2016; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 169, ECHR 2010; Schatschaschwili, cited above, § 100; and Asani v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27962/10, § 32, 1 February 2018).