Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 38713/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,62552) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BEREZA v. POLAND
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 27785/95
WLOCH v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 38713/06
In particular, in the proceedings in which an appeal against detention order is being examined, "equality of arms" between the parties, the prosecutor and the detained person must be ensured (Wloch v. Poland, no. 27785/95, §§ 129-135, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 38713/06
The Court notes that the general principles regarding the right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, have been stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI, and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references). - EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88
MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 38713/06
Although it is not always necessary that the procedure under Article 5 § 4 be attended by the same guarantees as those required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for criminal or civil litigation (see Megyeri v. Germany, judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, p. 11, § 22), it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question. - EGMR, 04.12.1979 - 7710/76
Schiesser ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 38713/06
In the case of a person whose detention falls within the ambit of Article 5 § 1 (c), a hearing is required (see Schiesser v. Switzerland, judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34, p. 13, §§ 30-31, and Kampanis v. Greece, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 318-B, p. 45, § 47). - EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91
KAMPANIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 38713/06
In the case of a person whose detention falls within the ambit of Article 5 § 1 (c), a hearing is required (see Schiesser v. Switzerland, judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34, p. 13, §§ 30-31, and Kampanis v. Greece, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 318-B, p. 45, § 47).
- EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 32114/13
PRGIC v. CROATIA
This is because it cannot speculate on what the domestic courts will decide or on what the outcome of any appeal available to the applicant might be (see Bereza v. Poland, no. 38713/06, § 47, 1 April 2008).