Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GEORGIY NIKOLAYEVICH MIKHAYLOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violations of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 4543/04
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 4543/04
• EGMR - 4543/04

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 41400/98

  MONFORTE SANCHO, GARCIA MORENO, ROIG ESPERT, ROIG ESPERT ET ICARDO GARCIA contre …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 4543/04

  38366/97, 38688/97, 40777/98, 40843/98, 41015/98, 41400/98, 41446/98, 41484/98, 41487/98 and 41509/98, § 37, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 4543/04

  The Court has to have regard, inter alia, to the complexity of the factual or legal issues raised by the case, to the conduct of the applicant and the competent authorities and to what was at stake for the former (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 16.11.2000 - 39442/98

  SOTIRIS ET NIKOS KOUTRAS ATTEE c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 4543/04

  However, the rules in question, or the application thereof, should not prevent persons amenable to the law from making use of an available remedy (see Société Anonyme Sotiris and Nikos Koutras Attee v. Greece, no. 39442/98, § 20, ECHR 2000-XII).

 
• EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 46129/99

  ZVOLSKÝ AND ZVOLSKÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 4543/04

  In sum, the Court concludes that the district court interpreted a procedural rule on time-limits in such a way as to prevent the applicant's appeal being examined on the merits, with the effect that the latter's right to the effective protection of the courts was infringed (see, mutatis mutandis, Zvolský and Zvolská v. the Czech Republic, no. 46129/99, § 51, ECHR 2002-IX, and Fetaovski v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 10649/03, § 39, 19 June 2008).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 4543/04

  In this way it embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 35-36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 4543/04

  The Court further reiterates that, whilst the Convention does not provide any right to an appeal in civil cases, if a right of appeal is provided in domestic law, Article 6 § 1 applies to such appellate procedures (see Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 25, Series A no. 11).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 31.03.2022 - C-18/21

  Uniqa Versicherungen - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Justizielle Zusammenarbeit …

  35 Grundsätzlich kann eine starre Anwendung von Fristen im Licht außergewöhnlicher Umstände einen Verstoß gegen Art. 47 der Charta darstellen, vgl. entsprechend Urteil des EGMR vom 1. April 2010, Georgiy Nikolayevich Mikhaylov/Russland (CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD000454304, Rn. 57).