Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S.H. ET AUTRES c. AUTRICHE

  (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S.H. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  (englisch)

• ieb-eib.org

  S.H. u.a. ./. Österreich

  (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Besprechungen u.ä.

• imabe.org (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Verbot von Samen- und Eizellenspende: eine Menschenrechtsverletzung? (Thomas Piskernigg)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  S.H. and others v. Austria

  [28.02.2008]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 57813/00
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00
• EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 57813/00

Papierfundstellen

• FamRZ 2010, 793

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00

  D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  71. The Court has established in its caselaw that, in order for an issue to arise under Article 14, there must be a difference in the treatment of persons in relevantly similar situations (D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007).

  However, an issue can only arise under Article 14 if the different treatment refers to situations which are relevantly similar (see D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007-...).

• EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  The Contracting State enjoys a margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment (Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2006-VI; Burden, cited above, § 60).

  Even if that is the case, the Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation when assessing whether and to what extent a different treatment is justified, (Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2006-VI, Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008-...).

• EGMR, 07.03.2006 - 6339/05

  EVANS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  It encompasses elements such as names (see Burghartz v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 280-B, p. 28, § 24), gender identification, sexual orientation and sexual life, which fall within the personal sphere protected by Article 8 (see, for example, Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, pp. 18-19, § 41, and Laskey, Jaggard and Brown v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 19 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, p. 131, § 36), and the right to respect for the decisions both to have and not to have a child (see Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 71, ECHR 2007-IV).

  Because of this, and the fact that the case concerns a very sensitive issue, the State should in my opinion be afforded a wide margin of appreciation (see Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007-IV).

 
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83

  GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  In this respect it reiterates that respect for private life requires that everyone should be able to establish details of their identity as individual human beings and that an individual's entitlement to such information is of importance because of its formative implications for his or her personality (see, for example, Mikuli v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, §§ 53-54, ECHR 2002-I, and Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 16, §§ 36-37, 39).
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 16213/90

  BURGHARTZ c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  It encompasses elements such as names (see Burghartz v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 280-B, p. 28, § 24), gender identification, sexual orientation and sexual life, which fall within the personal sphere protected by Article 8 (see, for example, Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, pp. 18-19, § 41, and Laskey, Jaggard and Brown v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 19 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, p. 131, § 36), and the right to respect for the decisions both to have and not to have a child (see Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 71, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82

  JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  In that connection the Court observes that the Convention is a living instrument, to be interpreted in the light of presentday conditions (see, inter alia, Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 53, Series A no. 112).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  58. The Court reiterates that the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention is a broad concept which encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, § 29), the right to "personal development" (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I) or the right to selfdetermination as such (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  58. The Court reiterates that the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention is a broad concept which encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, § 29), the right to "personal development" (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I) or the right to selfdetermination as such (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 42326/98

  Schutz des Rechts auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Familienlebens; Möglichkeit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  This includes obtaining information necessary to discover the truth concerning important aspects of one's personal identity, such as the identity of one's parents (see Jäggi v. Switzerland, no. 58757/00, § 25, ECHR 2006-..., and Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 29, ECHR 2003-III).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 58757/00

  JÄGGI c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  This includes obtaining information necessary to discover the truth concerning important aspects of one's personal identity, such as the identity of one's parents (see Jäggi v. Switzerland, no. 58757/00, § 25, ECHR 2006-..., and Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 29, ECHR 2003-III).
• EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 15472/02

  Folgerø u. a. ./. Norwegen
• EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

  DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

• OLG Rostock, 07.05.2010 - 7 U 67/09

  Zulässigkeit der weiteren Verwendung imprägnierter Eizellen nach dem Tode des …

  Anders als z.B. in Österreich gibt es in Deutschland noch kein Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz (zum österreichischen Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz vgl. EGMR , Urteil vom 01.04.2010 in Sachen S.H. u.a. gegen Österreich, Az. 57813/00).
• OLG München, 11.05.2010 - 25 U 1605/10
  Die vom Kläger vorgelegte Entscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofes für Menschenrechte vom 1.4.2010 - No. 57813/00 führt zu keinem anderen Ergebnis.