Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 61679/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,57008) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DULSKIY v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 (length) Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 61679/00
The Court recalls that the "reasonable" length of proceedings must be assessed in accordance with the circumstances of the case and the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the behaviour of the applicant and that of the competent authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
- EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 4469/07
SAVENKOVA v. UKRAINE
Even though the case examination might have been complicated by six expert examinations, the Court recalls that it is within the competence of a court to decide whether or not to seek outside advice (see Dulskiy v. Ukraine, no. 61679/00, § 71, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 10.11.2011 - 30741/08
LARIONOV v. UKRAINE
Even though the case examination may have been complicated by six expert examinations, the Court recalls that it is within the competence of a court to decide whether or not to seek outside advice (see Dulskiy v. Ukraine, no. 61679/00, § 71, 1 June 2006).