Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOSC v. POLAND

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KOSC v. POLAND

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12
• EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 34598/12

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95

  JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  The Court reiterates that the limits of acceptable criticism were thus wider for Z.M. acting in his public capacity than in relation to a private individual (see Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 38, ECHR 2001-II, and I Avgi Publishing and Press Agency S.A. and Karis v. Greece, no. 15909/06, § 34, 5 June 2008).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  There is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or debate on questions of public interest (see Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV, and Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 46, ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 39394/98

  SCHARSACH ET NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  Unlike the latter, the former inevitably and knowingly lay themselves open to close scrutiny of every word and deed by journalists and the public at large, and they must consequently display a greater degree of tolerance (see Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 42, Series A no. 103, and Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, no. 39394/98, § 30, ECHR 2003-XI).

 
• EGMR, 05.06.2008 - 15909/06

  I AVGI PUBLISHING AND PRESS AGENCY S.A. AND KARIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  The Court reiterates that the limits of acceptable criticism were thus wider for Z.M. acting in his public capacity than in relation to a private individual (see Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 38, ECHR 2001-II, and I Avgi Publishing and Press Agency S.A. and Karis v. Greece, no. 15909/06, § 34, 5 June 2008).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 109-113, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 10347/10

  MIKA c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  It thus clearly originated from a public debate on important issues for the local community (see Mika v. Greece, no. 10347/10, § 35, 19 December 2013).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 39954/08

  Axel Springer AG in Art. 10 EMRK (Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung) verletzt durch …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  It identified a number of relevant criteria where the right to freedom of expression is being balanced against the right to respect for private life (see, among other authorities, Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 83 to 93, ECHR 2015 (extracts), Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 89-95, 7 February 2012, and Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 39288/98

  EKIN ASSOCIATION v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  The Court is therefore empowered to give the final ruling on whether a "restriction" is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, among many other authorities, Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003-V, and Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 56, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  In sum, the Court's task in exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the national authorities, but rather to review under Article 10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their discretionary powers (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 47, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 34598/12

  The classification of a statement as a fact or as a value judgment is a matter which in the first place falls within the margin of appreciation of the national authorities, in particular the domestic courts (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 36, Series A no. 313).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

  MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE