Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 41887/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,17348) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GAPAEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GAPAEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 41887/09
For the Court, this is sufficient in the circumstances of this case to conclude that the first applicant raised "in substance" before the Supreme Administrative Court a complaint related to his family life (see, mutatis mutandis, among others, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 37-39, ECHR 1999-I, and L.L. v. France, no. 7508/02, § 22-23, ECHR 2006-XI). - EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 7508/02
L.L. c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 41887/09
For the Court, this is sufficient in the circumstances of this case to conclude that the first applicant raised "in substance" before the Supreme Administrative Court a complaint related to his family life (see, mutatis mutandis, among others, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 37-39, ECHR 1999-I, and L.L. v. France, no. 7508/02, § 22-23, ECHR 2006-XI).