Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AYVAZYAN v. ARMENIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08
• EGMR, 05.03.2020 - 56717/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  Any use of force must be no more than "absolutely necessary" for - and strictly proportionate to - the achievement of one or more of the purposes set out in sub-paragraphs (a) to (c) (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-149 and 200, Series A no. 324; Andronicou and Constantinou, cited above, § 171; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 110, ECHR 2001-III; and Wasilewska and Kalucka v. Poland, nos. 28975/04 and 33406/04, § 42, 23 February 2010).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  Thus, the police officers can be said to have had time at their disposal to plan the arrest operation, as opposed to having to deal with a random operation which may have given rise to unexpected developments to which the police may have been called upon to react without prior preparation (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 71-72, CEDH 2000-XII, and Celniku v. Greece, no. 21449/04, § 56, 5 July 2007).
• EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 24351/94

  AKTAS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  Nonetheless, where allegations are made under Article 2 of the Convention, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Aktas v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 271, ECHR 2003-V (extracts), and Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 52391/99, § 357, 10 November 2005).

 
• EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 50196/99

  BUBBINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  Thus, in determining whether the force used is compatible with Article 2, it may be relevant whether a law enforcement operation has been planned and controlled so as to minimise to the greatest extent possible recourse to lethal force or incidental loss of life (see Bubbins v. the United Kingdom, no. 50196/99, § 136, ECHR 2005-II (extracts)).
• EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 21449/04

  CELNIKU c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  Thus, the police officers can be said to have had time at their disposal to plan the arrest operation, as opposed to having to deal with a random operation which may have given rise to unexpected developments to which the police may have been called upon to react without prior preparation (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 71-72, CEDH 2000-XII, and Celniku v. Greece, no. 21449/04, § 56, 5 July 2007).
• EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 28975/04

  WASILEWSKA AND KALUCKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  Any use of force must be no more than "absolutely necessary" for - and strictly proportionate to - the achievement of one or more of the purposes set out in sub-paragraphs (a) to (c) (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-149 and 200, Series A no. 324; Andronicou and Constantinou, cited above, § 171; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 110, ECHR 2001-III; and Wasilewska and Kalucka v. Poland, nos. 28975/04 and 33406/04, § 42, 23 February 2010).
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 7678/09

  VAN COLLE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  The Court reiterates that close family members, including siblings, of a person whose death is alleged to engage the responsibility of the State, can themselves claim to be indirect victims of the alleged violation of Article 2 of the Convention, the question of whether they were legal heirs of the deceased not being relevant (see Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI; Velikova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 41488/98, ECHR 1999-V (extracts); and Van Colle v. the United Kingdom, no. 7678/09, § 86, 13 November 2012).
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  The Court further reiterates that Article 2 of the Convention contains a procedural obligation to carry out an effective investigation into alleged breaches of its substantive limb (for a summary of the relevant general principles see the recent Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, §§ 229 et seq., ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 56717/08

  Any use of force must be no more than "absolutely necessary" for - and strictly proportionate to - the achievement of one or more of the purposes set out in sub-paragraphs (a) to (c) (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-149 and 200, Series A no. 324; Andronicou and Constantinou, cited above, § 171; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 110, ECHR 2001-III; and Wasilewska and Kalucka v. Poland, nos. 28975/04 and 33406/04, § 42, 23 February 2010).