Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,17344) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TONYUK v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
It covers, inter alia, the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see, among other authorities, Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III, and Otgon v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 22743/07, § 15, 25 October 2016). - EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 4143/02
MORENO GÓMEZ c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
A serious interference may result in the breach of a person's right to respect for his home if it prevents him from enjoying the amenities of his home (see, in particular, Moreno Gómez v. Spain, no. 4143/02, § 53, ECHR 2004-X, and Zammit Maempel, cited above, § 36). - EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
It also secures to the individual a sphere within which he or she can freely pursue the development and fulfilment of his or her personality (see, in particular, Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 95, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)).
- EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00
FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
In a number of cases the Court has found Article 8 of the Convention applicable to complaints about environmental pollution and sensory nuisances affecting individuals" physical and psychological well-being and preventing them from enjoying their homes in such a way as to affect their private and family life adversely (see, among many others, López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 51, Series A no. 303 C; Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 96, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, §§ 68-70, ECHR 2005-IV). - EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 24202/10
Maempel ./. Malta
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
In a number of cases, the Court has reiterated that Article 8 of the Convention protects the individual's right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence (see, among other authorities, Zammit Maempel v. Malta, no. 24202/10, § 36, 22 November 2011). - EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 48183/99
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
It also secures to the individual a sphere within which he or she can freely pursue the development and fulfilment of his or her personality (see, in particular, Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 95, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
Having examined this question under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling in respect of the applicant's complaint under Article 8 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references). - EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 22743/07
OTGON v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 6948/07
It covers, inter alia, the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see, among other authorities, Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III, and Otgon v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 22743/07, § 15, 25 October 2016).