Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROLF GUSTAFSON c. SUÈDE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  Non-violation de l'Art. 6-1 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROLF GUSTAFSON v. SWEDEN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 22.02.1995 - 23196/94
• EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  1 (art. 6-1) are the guarantees, both substantive and procedural, which are in place (see the Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, pp. 72-73, para. 201).

  [6] See his separate opinion in the Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom case, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 27, and also his separate opinion, joined by Mr Macdonald, in the case of Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 80.

• EGMR, 25.10.1989 - 10842/84

  ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  [5] See also my separate opinion in the Pudas v. Sweden case, 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-A, p. 21, and in the Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden case, 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 24.
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  [6] See his separate opinion in the Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom case, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 27, and also his separate opinion, joined by Mr Macdonald, in the case of Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 80.

 
• EGMR, 27.10.1987 - 10426/83

  PUDAS c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  [5] See also my separate opinion in the Pudas v. Sweden case, 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-A, p. 21, and in the Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden case, 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 24.
• EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

  Sutter ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  Additionally it is to be noted that under Swedish law all such case files and the decisions thereon are available to the public (see the Sutter v. Switzerland judgment of 22 February 1984, Series A no. 74, p. 6).
• EGMR, 19.04.1993 - 13942/88

  KRASKA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  66. See also my concurring opinion in the Kraska v. Switzerland case, 19 April 1993, Series A no. 254-B, p. 54.
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  1 (art. 6-1) was complied with, it being recalled that this Article (art. 6-1) does not guarantee a right of appeal (see the Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, pp. 78-79, para. 59).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  It may thus reasonably be considered that he waived his right to a hearing before the Board (see the Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 21, para. 67; and the Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 19-20, para. 58).
• EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

  BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  The applicant has not disputed that the Board in its composition and operation satisfied the requirements of independence and impartiality, nor that it had jurisdiction to examine and decide with binding effect on all questions of fact and law relevant to the applicant's claim for criminal injuries compensation (see, among many other authorities, the Belilos v. Switzerland judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, p. 29, para. 64).
• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

  H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.1997 - 23196/94

  It may thus reasonably be considered that he waived his right to a hearing before the Board (see the Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 21, para. 67; and the Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 19-20, para. 58).
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

  MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

• EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 2388/15

  MARCOLINO DE JESUS c. PORTUGAL

  Compte tenu des arguments soulevés dans son mémoire en recours, la section du contentieux de la Cour suprême avait, dès lors, devant elle un dossier complet (comparer avec Rolf Gustafson c. Suède, no 23196/94, § 47, 1er juillet 1997).