Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GONTA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Gonta v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  Where such grounds are "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 152 and 153, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 23037/04

  MATIJASEVIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court or the official regards the accused as guilty (see, among many other authorities, Minelli, cited above, §§ 27, 30 and 37; Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, §§ 35-36, Series A no. 308; and Matijasevic v. Serbia, no. 23037/04, § 45, ECHR 2006-X).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court or the official regards the accused as guilty (see, among many other authorities, Minelli, cited above, §§ 27, 30 and 37; Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, §§ 35-36, Series A no. 308; and Matijasevic v. Serbia, no. 23037/04, § 45, ECHR 2006-X).

 
• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  There are exceptions to this principle, but they must not infringe the rights of the defence; as a general rule, paragraphs 1 and 3 (d) of Article 6 require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statement or at a later stage (Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 51, Reports 1997-III, and Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 49, Series A no. 238).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  The Court shares the Government's view that there is no causal link between the violations found and the pecuniary damage claimed (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 221, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  The Court reiterates that it has previously held that Article 6, and especially paragraph 3 of that Article, may be relevant before a case is sent for trial if and in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are actual indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13611/88

  Klaus Croissant

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  The Court has further held that the right to legal assistance does not confer an absolute right to choose one's counsel, and that domestic courts may override the applicant's choice of counsel when there are relevant and sufficient grounds (Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, § 29, Series A no. 237-B).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I).
• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 66820/01

  SVIPSTA c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 38494/04

  Moreover, the court orders maintaining the detention nearly always used identical, even stereotyped, wording and relied repeatedly on the same criteria, a practice which cannot be considered to comply with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Mansur v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 55, Series A no. 319-B; Svipsta v. Latvia, no. 66820/01, § 109, ECHR 2006-III (extracts); and Tiron, cited above, § 39).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz