Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 41688/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,30355) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SC ALEX PROD COM SRL v. ROMANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.01.2007 - 4227/02
IORGA c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 41688/07
Excerpts from the relevant domestic law concerning stamp duty, namely Law No. 146/1997 on stamp duty (as amended by Law No. 195/2004) and Ordinance No. 2214/1997 concerning the enforcement of Law No. 146/1997 are given in Iorga v. Romania (no. 4227/02, §§ 22-25, 25 April 2007).The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to access to a court (Weissman and Others v. Romania, no. 63945/00, §§ 39-43, ECHR 2006-VII (extracts); Iorga v. Romania, no. 4227/02, §§ 47-51, 25 April 2007); Adam v. Romania, no. 45890/05, §§ 29-32, 3 November 2009; and Rusen v. Romania, no. 38151/05, §§ 35-40, 8 January 2009).
- EGMR, 24.05.2006 - 63945/00
WEISSMAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 41688/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to access to a court (Weissman and Others v. Romania, no. 63945/00, §§ 39-43, ECHR 2006-VII (extracts); Iorga v. Romania, no. 4227/02, §§ 47-51, 25 April 2007); Adam v. Romania, no. 45890/05, §§ 29-32, 3 November 2009; and Rusen v. Romania, no. 38151/05, §§ 35-40, 8 January 2009). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 41688/07
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 38151/05
RUSEN c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 41688/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to access to a court (Weissman and Others v. Romania, no. 63945/00, §§ 39-43, ECHR 2006-VII (extracts); Iorga v. Romania, no. 4227/02, §§ 47-51, 25 April 2007); Adam v. Romania, no. 45890/05, §§ 29-32, 3 November 2009; and Rusen v. Romania, no. 38151/05, §§ 35-40, 8 January 2009). - EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 45890/05
ADAM c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 41688/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to access to a court (Weissman and Others v. Romania, no. 63945/00, §§ 39-43, ECHR 2006-VII (extracts); Iorga v. Romania, no. 4227/02, §§ 47-51, 25 April 2007); Adam v. Romania, no. 45890/05, §§ 29-32, 3 November 2009; and Rusen v. Romania, no. 38151/05, §§ 35-40, 8 January 2009).