Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.12.2011 - 26971/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55863) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
V. v. SLOVENIA
Art. 8 MRK
No violation of Art. 8 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
V. v. Slovenia
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 51585/99
HORVAT v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2011 - 26971/07
While it is not for the Court to give a ruling on an issue of domestic law that is as yet unsettled, the absence of any case-law does indicate the uncertainty of these remedies in practice (see, mutatis mutandis, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, § 44, ECHR 2001-VIII; Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 156, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts); and De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 39, Series A no. 77). - EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 35348/06
R. AND H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2011 - 26971/07
In this connection, the Court recalls the principles set out in Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland case in so far as they are relevant also to the present context (see Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, §§ 134-6, 6 July 2010 and R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35348/06, §§ 73-4, 31 May 2011). - EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2011 - 26971/07
While it is not for the Court to give a ruling on an issue of domestic law that is as yet unsettled, the absence of any case-law does indicate the uncertainty of these remedies in practice (see, mutatis mutandis, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, § 44, ECHR 2001-VIII; Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 156, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts); and De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 39, Series A no. 77). - EGMR, 22.06.1989 - 11373/85
ERIKSSON c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2011 - 26971/07
As to whether the measure in question was "in accordance with the law", the Court would first point out that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited and that it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply that law (see, for example, Eriksson v. Sweden, 22 June 1989, § 62, Series A no. 156). - EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94
Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2011 - 26971/07
Such further limitations entail the danger that the family relations between a young child and one or both parents would be effectively curtailed (see Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 49, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, § 67, ECHR 2002-I).