Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GERASIMENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GERASIMENKO AND SALIKHOVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10

  There are different avenues to ensure Convention rights, and even if the State has failed to apply one particular measure provided by domestic law, it may still fulfil its positive duty by other means (see Ciechonska, cited above, § 65; Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 96, ECHR 2005-IV; and Saso Gorgiev, cited above, § 44).
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 30015/96

  A.A. ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10

  However, the positive obligation is to be interpreted in such a way as not to impose an excessive burden on the authorities, bearing in mind, in particular, the unpredictability of human conduct and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III, and A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 30015/96, §§ 44-45, 27 July 2004).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10

  In keeping with the importance of Article 2 in a democratic society, the Court must subject allegations of a breach of this provision to the most careful scrutiny, taking into consideration not only the actions of the agents of the State who actually administered the force, but also all the surrounding circumstances (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 150, Series A no. 324).

 
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10

  Article 2 is therefore applicable in the instant case, given the degree and type of force used and the intention or aim behind it (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 51, ECHR 2004 XI; and Saso Gorgiev, cited above, § 36).
• EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98

  VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10

  The Court reiterates that Article 2, which safeguards the right to life and sets out the circumstances when deprivation of life may be justified, ranks as one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention, from which no derogation is permitted (see Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 68, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09

  DURDEVIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10

  The Government distinguished the present case from the cases of urÄ?evic v. Croatia (no. 52442/09, ECHR 2011 (extracts)) and Saso Gorgiev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 49382/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 37801/16

  RIBCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  5821/10 and 65523/12, § 82, 1 December 2016).
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 3959/14

  KHUDOROSHKO v. RUSSIA

  5821/10 and 65523/12, § 82, 1 December 2016).
• EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 48724/15

  ILGIZ KHALIKOV v. RUSSIA

  By lodging a criminal complaint with a prosecutor and challenging the refusal of the investigators to institute criminal proceedings before a court, the applicant has given the Russian authorities an adequate opportunity to remedy the alleged violation at the domestic level (see Gerasimenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 5821/10 and 65523/12, §§ 82-84, 1 December 2016).