Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 55955/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,65650) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 55955/00
- EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 55955/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95
DALBAN v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 55955/00
In this connection, the Court recalls that in various cases where an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or close family members who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see in this respect Karner, cited above, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI). - EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98
KARNER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 55955/00
The Court recalls that a person, non-governmental organisation or a group of individuals must, in order to be able to lodge a petition in pursuance of Article 34, claim "to be the victim of a violation... of the rights set forth in the Convention..." While it is true the rules of admissibility governed by Article 35 must be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism, Article 34 requires that an individual applicant should claim to have been actually affected by the violation alleged (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX and Fairfield and others v. the United Kingdom, 24790/04, 8 March 2005). - EGMR, 08.03.2005 - 24790/04
FAIRFIELD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 55955/00
The Court recalls that a person, non-governmental organisation or a group of individuals must, in order to be able to lodge a petition in pursuance of Article 34, claim "to be the victim of a violation... of the rights set forth in the Convention..." While it is true the rules of admissibility governed by Article 35 must be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism, Article 34 requires that an individual applicant should claim to have been actually affected by the violation alleged (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX and Fairfield and others v. the United Kingdom, 24790/04, 8 March 2005).